180 likes | 198 Views
Explore the kinematics of high-redshift galaxies to differentiate between rotating disks and major mergers using SINS survey data. Analyze velocity fields and classify z~0 and z~2 template galaxies. Study the formation and evolution of disks at z~2, noting the role of rapid inflow scenarios and secular evolution.
E N D
Kinemetry of High-Redshift Galaxies Distinguishing Rotating Disks from Major Mergers Kristen Shapiro and the SINS team: R. Genzel, N.M. Förster Schreiber, L.J. Tacconi, F. Eisenhauer, N. Bouché, D. Lutz, R. Davies, G. Cresci, S. Genel, E. Hicks, R. Bender, S. Seitz, A. Verma, M. Lehnert, N. Nesvadba, A. Sternberg, R. Ivison, F. Bertoldi, A. Blain, S. Chapman, P. Cox, T. Greve, R. Neri, A. Omont, I. Smail, D. Erb, A. Shapley, C. Steidel, A. Cimatti, E. Daddi, A. Renzini, V. Mignoli, N. Arimoto, X. Kong
BX 610 (2.2) MD 41 (2.2) rotation dominated K20-8 (2.2) SA12 6192 (1.51) dispersion dominated BX 599 (2.33) 200 -170 100 150 80 -100 -70 D3a 6004 (2.4) -80 - 90 K20-5 (2.2) -170 170 SA12 6339 (2.3) -170 BX 502 (2.16) 170 -50 35 ZC1101592 (1.41) D3a 6397 (1.51) D3a 7144 (1.7) 240 -20 120 + 130 30 140 D3a 15504 (2.4) GK2471 (2.43) BM 1163 (1.41) -200 GK 167 (2.58) -120 30 170 -140 30 -240 BX 405 (2.03) K20-9 (2.0) 40 -60 -160 -170 200 BX482 (2.2) -30 -200 BX389 (2.2) BX 404 (2.03) K20-6 (2.2) -35 SA12 8768 (2.2) 240 280 -45 +200 GK2252 (2.41) 30 70 -5 -60 80 D3a 4751 (2.27) 70 BX663 (2.4) -280 70 -70 ZC782941 (2.2) -120 1 (8 kpc) 160 -70 -160 +160 The SINS Survey K20-7 (2.2) -80 BX528 (2.3) 120 160 merger GK 2113 (1.61) +380 -70 0 -30 50 110 Förster Schreiber et al. (2008)
Qualitative Comparison to z~0 Spiral Galaxies Local rotation curves from Sofue & Rubin 2001
Qualitative Comparison to z~0 Template Galaxies Local ULIRG Local Spiral Galaxy Daigle et al. 2006 Colina et al. 2005 Shapiro et al. 2008
Qualitative Comparison to z~0 Template Galaxies Local ULIRG Local Spiral Galaxy Daigle et al. 2006 Colina et al. 2005 Total: ~30 template galaxies, from local observations and simulations of high-z systems (Simulations from Naab et al. 2007) Shapiro et al. 2008
… Quantifying Velocity Fields with Kinemetry Kinemetry analysis of first and second velocity moment for highest quality SINS data Krajnović et al. 2006
… Quantifying Velocity Fields with Kinemetry Kinemetry analysis of first and second velocity moment for highest quality SINS data B1 B3 Krajnović et al. 2006
… Quantifying Velocity Fields with Kinemetry Kinemetry analysis of first and second velocity moment for highest quality SINS data Krajnović et al. 2006
Classifying z~0 Template Galaxies Shapiro et al. 2008
… Classifying z~0 Template Galaxies Kinemetry analysis of first and second velocity moment for highest quality SINS data mergers disk galaxies Krajnović et al. 2006 Shapiro et al. 2008
Classifying z~2 UV/optical-Bright Systems Kinemetry analysis of first and second velocity moment for highest quality SINS data mergers disk galaxies 2 / 3 are disk-like Shapiro et al. 2008
Classifying z~2 UV/optical-Bright Systems Shapiro et al. 2008
Formation of Disks at z~2 BzK-15504 BzK-6004 BzK-ZC782941 Hα Integrated flux FWHM 50 70 (km/s) 500 160 170 60 MSF Region ~ 108 M SFR ~ 100-200 M/yr Genzel et al. 2006
Formation of Disks at z~2 M* ~ 8 x 1010 M SFR ~ 100-200 M/yr Age ~ 500 Myr Genzel et al. 2006
Formation of Disks at z~2 tstars ~ 500 Myr SED Modeling taccretion ~ tgas exhaustion ~ 200-800 Myr v / 2-4 (rapid) inflow scenario: Dekel & Birnboim 2003, Immeli et al. 2004, D’Onghia et al. 2006 Genzel et al. 2006
Future Evolution of z~2 Disks Immeli et al. 2004 Genzel et al. 2008
The Evolution of z~2 UV/optical-bright Systems Population consists mainly of large, rotating disks Likely formed via smooth accretion, not major mergers Evolve into z~0 bulge-dominated systems Secular evolution may play an important role