1 / 18

ESD methods: DIALOGUE MAPPING

Join Prof. Dr. Roberto Biloslavo for a workshop on Dialogue Mapping and its application in fostering collective intelligence and solving wicked problems in the context of Education for Sustainable Development in Protected Areas and Biosphere Reserves. Learn how to effectively facilitate group discussions, create shared understanding, and design innovative solutions using the Dialogue Mapping approach.

ejohns
Download Presentation

ESD methods: DIALOGUE MAPPING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESD methods: DIALOGUE MAPPING Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in Protected Areas and Biosphere Reserves Amfissa, Greece Prof. Dr. Roberto Biloslavo, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management, Slovenia

  2. About myself • Prof. of Management • University of Primorska, Faculty of Management (Slovenia) • Research areas: management, strategic management, sustainable development, wisdom & leadership • co-author of „Management of Sustainable Development“ – Msc. programme

  3. Time schedule • 9.15 – 11.00 Theoretical Introduction • 11.30 – 12.45 Presentation of Dialogue Mapping by use of Compendium software (free available) • 16.15 – 18.00 Work in groups (3 cases of interests/ group, design of possible solution by use of DM for the most worthy) • 18.30 – 19.45 Presentations (20 min presentation, 5 min discussion)

  4. Collective intelligence and forces of fragmetation • Collective inteligence = the creativity and resourcefulness that a group or team can bring to a complex and novel problem • Forces of fragmentation = support conditions in which the people involved see themselves as more separated than united, and in which information and knowledge are chaotic and scattered Fragmentation = Wickedness x Social Complexity

  5. Opportunity-driven problem solving The waterfall is a picture of already knowing – you already know about the problem and its domain, you know about the right process and tools to solve it, and you know what a solution will look like Problem Gather data Analyze data Formulate solution Implement solution Solution Time Figure 1: The „waterfall“

  6. Opportunity-driven problem solving The jagged line of opportunity-driven problem solving is a picture of learning Problem Gather data Analyze data Formulate solution Implement solution Solution Time Figure 2: The „jagged“ line

  7. Wicked problems Any problem is a nail problem if I have only a hammer A problem doesn’t have to possess all six characteristics in order to be wicked!

  8. Tame problems

  9. How we cope with wicked problems Two approaches: 1. Studying the problem; 2. Taming it

  10. Social complexity • If not being included in the thinking and decision-making process members of the social network may seek to undermine or even sabotage the project if their needs are not considered • Social complexity is a function of the number and diversity of players who are involved in a project • „We all pretty much think and act the same way“ doesn’t hold anymore • People have: different jagged line, different ideas about the problem, and what the criteria for success are

  11. Social complexity Problem Gather data Analyze data Formulate solution Implement solution Solution Time A B

  12. Shared understanding and share commitment • Becauseof social complexity, solving a wicked problem is fundamentally a SOCIALprocess • TheHolyGrailofeffectivecollaboration: creatingsharedunderstandingaboutthe problem, andsharedcommitment to thepossiblesolution • Sharedunderstadingdoes NOT meannecessarilyanagreement • Sharedunderstadingmeansthatthestakeholdersunderstandeachother’s positionswellenough to haveintelligentdialogoueaboutthedifferentinterpretationsofthe problem • Sharedunderstadingfocuses on wherewe are, sharedcommitmentfocuses on wherewe’regoing Designpolarity = Whatought to bevs. Whatcanbe done

  13. Elements of dialogue mapping • Display – shared display medium such as a computer projector, flipchart paper, or a whiteboard • Notation – a grammar or method that provides the „rules“ for how the content is to be structured in the display medium • Mapping - a person skilled in capturing group interactions in the display according to the notation

  14. Dialogue mapper • Actively listen to the conversation • Summarize the conversational moves in the collaborative display using the IBIS argumentation structure • Incrementally validate the map so that group members accept and own the map as a faithful representation of their thinking

  15. IBIS notation ?– maps generally starts with Questions like „What should we do about X?“ - the response to a question is an Idea. Ideas respond to one and only one Question. andPros and Cons

  16. IBIS notation without computer - sample Too vague Legendary service Simple, easy to remember What should our mission statement be? Best performance Committed to being a green company, contributing to society Warning: Maps don’t always grow left to right – sometimes ideas hang out for a while, waiting for their Question to become clear

  17. Question Types • Deontic questions:“What should we do?“ • Instrumental questions:“How should we do it?“ • Criterial questions:“What are the criteria?“ • Meaning or Conceptual questions:“What does X mean?“ • Factual questions:“What is X?“ or „Is X true?“ • Stakeholder questions:“Who are the stakeholders?“ or „Who cares about the outcome?“

  18. Checklist for decision making • Ask all the key questions • Case making for key ideas • Case making against key ideas • Endorsements • Validation of criteria • Making the decision

More Related