1 / 29

Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Cross-Site Progress Report

Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Cross-Site Progress Report. Jutta Butler & Randolph D. Muck, SAMHSA, CSAT Michael L. Dennis, Susan H. Godley, Mark D. Godley & The Chestnut Health Systems Team Webinar Presentation for AAFT grantees on February 25 th. Goals.

elaine
Download Presentation

Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Cross-Site Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Cross-SiteProgress Report Jutta Butler & Randolph D. Muck, SAMHSA, CSAT Michael L. Dennis, Susan H. Godley, Mark D. Godley & The Chestnut Health Systems Team Webinar Presentation for AAFT grantees on February 25th

  2. Goals • Describe the background for the AAFT initiative • Summarize GAIN and A-CRA/ACC training/certification progress • Report overall recruitment and follow-up performance • Describe the adolescents seen in the initiative based on a number of demographic and clinical characteristics • Present outcome data summarized across sites and compared to other CSAT initiatives

  3. Grant Programs that Are Completely ( ) or Partially ( ) using a common evidenced based assessment, the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN), and pooling their data to support immediate clinical decision making, local program evaluation/development, and secondary analysis for policy/research CSAT Adolescent Treatment Grant Program • 1997-2000 4- Cannabis Youth Treatment (CYT) experiments • 1998-2003 10- Adolescent Treatment Models (ATM) • 2000-2003 7- Persistent Effects of Treatment Study (PETS-A) • 2002-2007 12- Strengthening Communities for Youth (SCY) • 2002-2007 10- Reclaiming Futures (RF) diversion projects • 2002-2008 12+ Targeted Capacity Expansion TCE/HIV • 2003-2006 17 Adolescent Residential Treatment (ART) • 2003-2007 38 Effective Adolescent Treatment (EAT) • 2004-2009 22 Young Offender Re-entry Programs (YORP) • 2005-2008 20 Juvenile & Family Drug Treatment Court (TDC) • 2005-2008 16 State Adolescent Coordinator (SAC) grants • 2006-2010 33 Adolescent Assertive Family Treatment • 2007-2010 4 OJJDP RWJF Replication grants • 2008-2009 3 OJJDP-CSAT Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (BIRT)

  4. Overview of Program • Purpose: To provide support for the initial training and implementation of evidenced based approaches to assessment and treatment for adolescents and their families/primary caregivers • Key Components • Formal training and technical assistance implementing the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) to improve intake assessment, clinical interpretation, monitoring, and data management • Formal training and technical assistance implementing the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) and Assertive Continuing Care (ACC) to support clinical intervention and supervision • Average of $328,000/yr x 3 years grant award to help with initial implementation • Other technical assistance to facilitate implementation

  5. Assertive Adolescent Family Treatment (AAFT) Grant Sites by Funding Cohort WA NH VT ME MT ND OR MN Manchester ID NY SD WI Syracuse MI Boston CA WY Oakland Cambridge IO San Francisco PA Fitchburg CT RI Reno NE OH San Jose Thornton IL Columbus NJ IN NV UT WV Fresno Aurora CO MO DE Huntington VA KS KY Los Angeles MD Columbia Downey D.C NC AZ Tarzana Oak Ridge TN . AR Nashville Phoenix OK NM SC Little Rock Tucson AAFT Cohort 1 (2006-2009) GA AL MS TX Ft Worth LA AAFT Cohort 2 (2007-2010) Huntsville FL Orlando Houston AK San Antonio Pinellas Park Laredo PR HI

  6. Unique Components of this initiative • GAIN clinical certification • ABS software • Clinical supervisor certification process • Web-based tool for clinical and supervisory certification based on digital technology • Implementation calls paired with monthly implementation progress reports • Cultural responsiveness committee

  7. Clients Served and Costs • The grantees are 2-3 years into their 3 year awards • They have served 2,160 of the prorated 2,582 target to date (84%) and 4,233 target over the whole program (51%) • They have an average raw cost of $9,729.6 per family served vs. an expected cost of $7,962.7 per family served (122%) • They have an average adjusted cost (cutting off 20% for overhead/evaluation) of $7,783.70 per family served vs. an expected adjusted cost of $6,370 per family served (122%)

  8. GAIN Certification Progress

  9. DemographicProfile *Any Hispanic ethnicity separate from race group. Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  10. Pattern of Weekly Use (13+/90 days) : Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  11. Substance Use Problems Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  12. Past 90 day HIV Risk Behaviors Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  13. Co-Occurring Psychiatric Problems Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  14. Past Year Violence & Crime Notes: \a Dealing, manufacturing, prostitution, gambling (does not include simple possession or use); \b 14 or more days on probation/parole with urine monitoring Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  15. Count of Major Clinical Problems at Intake\a Median = 4 Problems Note: \a Based on count of self reporting criteria to suggest Alcohol, cannabis, or other drug disorder, depression, anxiety, trauma, suicide, ADHD, CD, victimization, violence/ illegal activity Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  16. No. of Problems\a by Severity of Victimization Severity of Victimization Note: \a Based on count of self reporting criteria to suggest Alcohol, cannabis, or other drug disorder, depression, anxiety, trauma, suicide, ADHD, CD, victimization, violence/ illegal activity. OR=Odds Ratio relative to Low Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data Set (n=1,544)

  17. 0% Sites with 2+ Staff GAIN Certified or In process Within Window (100% of Sites) 91% Recruitment Rate (80%+) 84% Session 2 Alliance (80%+)\q 85% 3 Month follow-up (80%+)\a 79% 6 Month follow-up (80%+)\a 71% 12 Month follow-up (80%+)\a Site Data Submission Ok to Good (80%+) Performance (goal): Recruitment and Monitoring 100% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 100% Notes: \a based on done divided by due minus expected, plus same percent expected of those still pending in window Source: CSAT October 2008 AAFT Management Report (n=1,602)

  18. A-CRA/ACC Certification Progress

  19. Performance (goal): Treatment Received Targeted Improvement over general practice Source: CSAT October 2008 AAFT Management Report (n=1,602)

  20. Performance (goal): Early Treatment Outcomes Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data set with 1+ Follow-up (n=1,045)

  21. Performance: Change Over Time in Selected Outcomes Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data set with 1+ Follow-up (n=1,045)

  22. Intake to 6 Month GPRA Outcomes Relative to Other CSAT Adolescent Treatment Programs Source: SAIS System (GPRA) 2008 data

  23. Performance: Outcome Status at Last Wave Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data set with 1+ Follow-up (n=1,045)

  24. Performance: Count of Positive Outcomes Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data set with 1+ Follow-up (n=1,045)

  25. Count of Positive Outcomes by Continuing Care at 90 days Source: CSAT August 2008 AAFT GAIN Data set with 1+ Follow-up (n=1,045)

  26. Change in 6 Month Abstinence Relative to Other CSAT Adolescent Treatment Grant Programs Notes: \a GAIN Required, \b A-CRA/ACC required, \c MET/CBT5 required, \d Juvenile justice grant encouraging use of GAIN, ACRA/ACC and/or MET/CBT5 but without as much training/oversight Source: SAIS System (GPRA) 2008 data

  27. Characteristics and Outcomes Site Profiles Report • Site Profile report is created quarterly for each project. Included are charts that depict: • Client demographics, violence, crime, SES, etc at intake • Client use patterns at intake • Preliminary outcome measures based on scale scores using GAIN M90 compared to GAIN I scores • Treatment Satisfaction average results • Comparison charts with the option to compare to other sites in the project cohort • Where to get access: • Reports are emailed to the PI and Data Manager each quarter • Reports are also archived on the APSS website (http://www.chestnut.org/li/APSS/) under the “GAIN Multi-Site Collaboration Materials” Report bullet. • Contact data_submit@chestnut.org for more information or assistance in accessing and using reports.

  28. Summary • The CSAT Adolescent Treatment program has demonstrated the ability to replicate A-CRA and ACC approaches in community based settings • Both the GAIN and the A-CRA/ACC training and certification processes appear to be working well in AAFT based on numbers of staff achieving certification • Adolescents appear to like the intervention • Outcomes to date compare favorably to previous CSAT replication efforts and other CSAT funded initiatives

  29. Questions? For more information or a copy of this presentation please contact:gaininfo@chestnut.org

More Related