1 / 32

State of Readiness NSC 2011

Umalusi Presentation to the Portfolio Committee 13 September 2011 Vijayen D Naidoo. State of Readiness NSC 2011. Quality Assurance of the 2011 National Senior Certificate Examination. Regulatory Framework QAA NQF Act Section 27 (h)

elaine
Download Presentation

State of Readiness NSC 2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Umalusi Presentation to the Portfolio Committee 13 September 2011 Vijayen D Naidoo State of ReadinessNSC 2011

  2. Quality Assurance of the 2011 National Senior Certificate Examination

  3. Regulatory Framework • QAA • NQF Act Section 27 (h) • The QC must develop and implement policy and criteria for assessment for the qualifications on its sub-framework.

  4. Section17 of the GENFETQA Act • (5) The Council must, with the concurrence of the Director-General and • after consultation with the relevant assessment body or education • institution, approve the publication of the results of learners if the • Council is satisfied that the assessment body or education institution • has— • (i) conducted the assessment free from any irregularity that may • jeopardise the integrity of the assessment or its outcomes; • (ii) complied with the requirements prescribed by the Council for • conducting assessments; • (iii) applied the standards prescribed by the Council which a learner is • required to comply with in order to obtain a certificate; and • (iv) complied with every other condition determined by the Council.

  5. Framework for QA of Learner Achievement • Based on established and existing practices in assessment for certification • Quality assures both prescribed components of External assessment (examinations) and Site based/ internal / continuous assessment • Use of systems, processes, and procedures to evaluate, inspect, monitor and report on examination systems, processes and procedures of public and private assessment bodies.

  6. Framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment • Evaluation and /or accreditation of assessment bodies • Periodic inspection of assessment bodies • Ongoing monitoring of assessment bodies • Quality assurance of external examinations through: • Moderation of examination question papers • Monitoring the conduct of examinations • Moderation of marking • Standardization of assessment outcomes

  7. Framework for Quality Assurance of Assessment • Quality assurance of internal assessment through: • Monitoring the implementation of internal assessment • Moderation of learner tasks and educator portfolios • Statistical moderation of internal assessment results.

  8. Approval of Results - Policy • Compliance with minimum requirements • Shift from Moderation to Verification (Moderation for verification) • Emphasis on Assessment Body reports • The monitoring of the conduct of examinations and the moderation of marking as well as the monitoring of the implementation of internal assessment and the moderation of internal assessment is undertaken by Umalusi to verify the veracity of the assessment body reports in respect of these process. • Broadened definition of irregularities.

  9. PURPOSE • to ensure that the question papers are of the required standard • To ensure that the question papers are relatively: - fair - reliable - representative of an adequate sample of the curriculum - representative of relevant conceptual domains - representative of relevant levels of cognitive challenge • External moderators (panels) Ensuring Standards: Moderating question papers

  10. Scope of the quality assurance processes Number of NSC 2011 question papers moderated

  11. STRENGTHENING THE APPROVAL PROCESS • Additional layer of QA - final sign off • Participated in pre- testing of sample question papers • Post-exam analysis Moderation of question papers

  12. Internal assessment refers to any assessment conducted by the provider, the outcomes of which count towards the achievement of the qualification • panels of moderators / subject specialists • Moderation at all levels • Directives for internal assessment • Prescribed criteria - Educator Portfolios - Learner portfolios (body of evidence) Moderation of internal /continuous assessment

  13. Ascertain the appropriateness and standard of the assessment tasks being developed within schools • Ascertain the degree to which assessment bodies/provinces are attempting to ensure standardisation across • Determine the extent and quality of internal moderation and educator development • Determine the reliability and validity of the assessment outcomes Moderation of internal assessmentcont

  14. Moderation of SBA • Previous model - moderation of learner and educator portfolios at the end of the year. • Implementation of new model in 2010 –focus on tasks rather than on portfolios • Ongoing moderations across 9 PDE’s, IEB & ERCO • Improve feed back to educators • Improvement in SBA implementation

  15. Moderation of SBA • Non-adherence to sampling – EC • Provincial moderation still compliance/audit focused • Quality of tasks and assessment must be improved. • Training of Educators

  16. The focus is on: • Policy development and implementation • Systems, processes and procedures • Plan for assessment and moderation • Availability and training of staff Monitoring Administration of Exams

  17. Monitoring of Examinations

  18. PURPOSE • Moderation of marking determines the standard and quality of marking and ensures that marking is conducted in accordance with agreed practices • Umalusi engages the following during the moderation of marking 1. Pre-marking/memorandum discussion: centralised memo discussions recommended - this will ensure consistency across marking centres 2. Off-site moderation of marking 3. On-site moderation of marking Verification of Marking

  19. Verification of Marking

  20. Verification of the Resulting Process

  21. Standardisation and Resulting

  22. Monitoring the State of Readiness • New approach • One Assessment body (DBE) with 9 provincial arms vs. 9 separate assessment bodies. • Avoid duplication (parallel processes)and burden on provincial authorities • “Lift” the system – Umalusi to assume a verification role. • “Shadowing” the DBE team to establish the veracity of the DBE monitoring processes and to authenticate DBE reports.

  23. The DBE Monitoring Process • Audit of PDE systems • PDE’s required to complete a self-evaluation instrument and develop improvement plan. • Monitoring visits (evaluation/support) to Head Office, District & Exam Centers- monitored against Audit report and improvement plan for Examinations and Assessment. • Submission of composite report to relevant authorities (Umalusi included) • Comprehensive approach that monitors exam systems (including SBA)

  24. Umalusi findings-KZN • Compliance / Strong points • Mature /consolidated exam system • Management and Operational plans • Mark capture system • Concerns • Staffing – vacant posts; contract workers • Security at nodal points ( outlying areas) • High number of marking centers • Irregularities

  25. Umalusi findings-EC • Compliance / Strong points • Mature /consolidated exam system • Management and Operational plans • Concerns • Staffing – vacant posts; contract workers • Security – storage facilities at Butterworth • Private Centers/independent schools • Large number of marking centers • Labour issues

  26. Umalusi findings-Mpumalanga • Compliance / Strong points • Management and Operational plans • Key management posts filled • Exam processes in place • Concerns • Coordination and communication between HO and districts • Printing of Question papers • Private centers • Large number of marking centers • Security and • Appointment of markers

  27. Umalusi findings-Limpopo • Compliance / Strong points • Management and Operational plans • 50 posts filled • Exam processes in place • Concerns • Printing of Question papers • Large number of distribution points • Security • Appointment of markers • District monitoring • Script control

  28. Umalusi findings-North West • Compliance / Strong points • Management and Operational plans • Assessment Management coordinating committee • Exam processes in place • Printing • Concerns • Use of schools as distribution points • Monitoring compromised – shortage of vehicles

  29. Concerns: Other Provinces • Gauteng • Independent Schools • Western Cape • Highly centralised –minimal district involvement • Security of question papers – distribution and storage • Northern Cape • Security – storage of question papers; return of answer books

  30. Umalusi Overall Evaluation • Systems and Processes are in place to ensure the administration of the 2011 NSC examinations. • Identified risks will have to be closely monitored. Includes follow up visits. • Umalusi remains confident that we will be able to ensure a credible 2011 NSC examination.

  31. Thank you!

More Related