120 likes | 133 Views
Discover why organizing is vital in the European Students' Union (ESU) and how it has shaped European higher education policies. Explore ESU's actions at the European and national levels, including their influence on the Bologna process, quality assurance standards, EU funding, and more.
E N D
Why “organise”? Karina Ufert European Students’ Union, Chairperson
Why organise? 17th October 1982: Norway, United Kingdom, Sweden, Iceland, France, Denmark and Austria created Western European Students Information Bureau (WESIB) Aims: Coordinate the flow of information between the union members and international bodies, like UNESCO, Council of Europe
Why organise? Political changes in Eastern Europe (80-90ies) – “Iron curtain” goes down WESIB becomes ESIB (European Student Information Bureau) in 1990 Membership: from 16 in 1990 to 31 in 1992! First policy papers – Human Rights and Democracy, Equal Opportunities
The rise of Bologna… In 1999, 29 Ministers signed so-called Bologna declaration, calling for establishment of the… European Higher Education Area (EHEA), to ensure comparable, compatible and coherent systems of Higher education in Europe But without students.
ESIB responds: • Already in 2001 – reference to “students as competent and constructive partners” • In 2003 ESIB present at Ministerial Conference, presenting students’ view on Bologna process • In 2005 ESG are presented and adopted by the Ministers • In 2007 ESIB becomes ESU – what does it mean?
Paradigms in higher education Funding through EU budget
Europe: driving forces • Quality assurance – European standards and guidelines (currently under revision) • EU funds – Lifelong learning programme, including ERASMUS Rest is difficult to capture – Ministerial communiqués, Director general declarations, Council conclusions, Commission staff papers, European Parliament reports… For example, did you know that tuition fees enhance equity?
ESU: actions European level – influence the framework: • Act through mass media to emphasise core policy lines, such as access to higher education, more funding for higher education • Set the agenda – ESU co-chairing Social dimension working group • Encourage discussions on sensitive issues: Loan scheme • Influence politics on EU level (EP elections 2014?) • Stakeholder or lobbyist? National level – support implementation: • Information provision and communication to NUS (47) • Creating space for sharing practices • Capacity building (also through enhancement visits) • Communication to the national media • Empowerment for a constructive dialogue with decision-makers
ESU in 2013: • Final negotiations on Erasmus for all (and the loan scheme) • ESG revision – draft from E4 group to BFUG • Council conclusions on Equity (tackling drop-out rates) • Agenda for Social dimension working group • Interactive platform on funding of HE in Europe, advocacy tools, trainings • “Constructing” employability – training for NUS • Looking for alternative means to support degree mobility (Nordic compensation scheme?)
ESU has… • Access to information • Access to decision-makers • Access to mass media (IHT, The Times, The Economist, University World News, etc.) • 10 elected reps (and 3 coordinators) • Office in Brussels (7 employees) • 47 national unions in 38 countries Together we need to find, how to use it for the needs of students.