1 / 21

NEES 4 th Annual Meeting

NEES 4 th Annual Meeting. Instrumentation for the NEESR Sand Aging Field Experiment David A. Saftner University of Michigan PhD Student. SAND AGING. Co-Authors. Mr Thaweesak Jirathanathaworn, UM PhD Student Dr Russell Green, UM Assistant Professor.

elda
Download Presentation

NEES 4 th Annual Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NEES 4th Annual Meeting Instrumentation for the NEESR Sand Aging Field Experiment David A. Saftner University of Michigan PhD Student

  2. SAND AGING Co-Authors • Mr Thaweesak Jirathanathaworn, UM PhD Student • Dr Russell Green, UM Assistant Professor • Ms Jennifer Ngai, UM Undergraduate Student • Dr Jerome Lynch, UM Assistant Professor

  3. SAND AGING Special Thanks • Dr Richard Woods, UM Professor Emeritus • Mulzer Crushed Stone, Inc. • Nicholson Construction • Dr Kyle Rollins, BYU Professor • Mr Jan Pantolin, UM Lab Technician

  4. SAND AGING Outline • Sand Aging Overview • Project Overview • Parameters and Instrumentation • Data Acquisition Systems (DAS) • DAS and Instrumentation Comparison • Summary

  5. SAND AGING Sand Aging Overview • Time dependent strength gain without measurable increase in settlement • First extensive study during Jebba Dam construction on Niger River in Nigeria (1984) • Increase in soil improvement projects increases importance of sand aging

  6. SAND AGING Sand Aging Overview • Explanations • Mechanical changes – particle reorientation, particle shearing (Mesri et al, 1990) • Aging measured after tens of minutes • (figure from Bowman, 2002)

  7. SAND AGING Sand Aging Overview • Explanations (Continued) • Chemical changes – creation of cementation through silica gel (Mitchell and Solymar, 1984) • Denisov & Reltov experiment • Aging without fabric disruption • Reduced strength under blast areas • General theories – pore pressure dissipation, blast gas dissipation, and cold welding

  8. SAND AGING Project Overview • Site requirements = loose, clean, saturated sand

  9. SAND AGING Project Overview • Liquefaction induction methods • Explosive compaction • Vibro-compaction • Vibro-seis

  10. SAND AGING Parameters and Instrumentation • Acceleration • Micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) accelerometers • Piezoelectric • accelerometers • Geophones • (velocity) • Allow for calculation • of energy dissipation • in the soil and its • effect on aging

  11. SAND AGING Parameters and Instrumentation • Settlement • Sondex settlement tubes • Determine • settlement as a • function of • depth and time Sondex readout w/ probe Inclinometer casing inside Sondex corrugated pipe Sensing ring (magnet) Inclinometer and sensing ring installed at stable ground

  12. SAND AGING Parameters and Instrumentation • Pore Water Pressure • Pore pressure transducers • Will ensure that liquefaction is induced • Multiple sensors will monitor spatial generation and dissipation of excess pore pressure

  13. SAND AGING Parameters and Instrumentation • Sampling Rate • Acceleration – based on testing method • Settlement – weekly • Pore Pressure – 1 Hz • Sampling Duration • Acceleration – based on testing method • Settlement – UTC • Pore Pressure – until conditions return to hydrostatic (we expect hours)

  14. SAND AGING Data Acquisition Systems • Olson Instruments, Inc. Freedom Data PC • 16 channels • User defined sampling • rate • 20 GB hard drive

  15. SAND AGING Data Acquisition Systems • Wireless Data Acquisition System (DAS) • 128 kB RAM • Transmits data up to 300m at 38.4 KB/s • Sampling rates: 50, 70, 100, 200, 400, & 500 Hz

  16. SAND AGING DAS Comparison • Shaker moving at 10 Hz • Manifold holds pressure up to 1000 psi

  17. SAND AGING DAS Comparison • Geophones output 7 V per in/sec • Correct frequency measured in both systems • Impedance of wireless DAS distorts amplitude

  18. SAND AGING DAS Comparison • Pressure transducers output 5 V per ksi • Cable based DAS does not recognize DC input without being reconfigured • Wireless systems reports correct output Cable-based Wireless Volts Time (seconds)

  19. SAND AGING Instrumentation Comparison • Emplacing Instrumentation • Geophones • MEMS & • Piezoelectric • Accelerometers

  20. SAND AGING Summary • Sand aging = time-dependent strength gain • Measure acceleration, settlement, and pore pressure dissipation caused by three liquefaction methods • Different DAS appropriate for different instruments • Emplacement methods next step in determining which instruments will be used

  21. Questions? http://www-personal.umich.edu/~rugreen/NEES/

More Related