1 / 26

WRECK REMOVAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY: Liability and Coverage Issues

WRECK REMOVAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY: Liability and Coverage Issues. Harold K. Watson, Partner Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP. Vessel owner’s liability for wreck removal. Wreck Act Tort theories Drilling contracts

eldon
Download Presentation

WRECK REMOVAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY: Liability and Coverage Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WRECK REMOVAL IN THE 21ST CENTURY: Liability and Coverage Issues Harold K. Watson, Partner Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP

  2. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Vessel owner’s liability for wreck removal • Wreck Act • Tort theories • Drilling contracts • Minerals Management Service regulations • Nairobi International Convention on the Removal of Wrecks

  3. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Wreck Act • Prohibits allowing a vessel to sink in a navigable channel “in such a manner as to obstruct, impede, or endanger navigation” • Requires the owner to mark and remove the wreck

  4. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Applicability of the Wreck Act • Applies to “navigable channels” • Part of Rivers and Harbors Act • Other provisions refer to “waters of the United States • Conclusion: only territorial waters • Only applies if wreck obstructs navigation

  5. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP The Wreck Act and Limitation of Liability: Negligent Owners • Prior to 1986, only applied to vessels that sank “voluntarily or carelessly” • Wyandotte Transp. Co. v. U.S. (1967): negligent owner cannot abandon to the US • The Ida Green (5th Cir. 1977): negligent owner cannot limit liability

  6. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Wreck Act and Limitation: Non-Negligent Owners • 1986 amendment removed words “voluntarily or carelessly” • In re Southern Scrap Material Co. (5th Cir. 2008): non-negligent owner cannot limit

  7. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP The Wreck Act and Offshore Activities • OCSLA extends the Wreck Act to “artificial islands, installations, and other devices” • Requires removal of platforms and MODUs • Still requires an “obstruction to navigation”

  8. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Tort Liability • Negligence • Other theories?

  9. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Drilling Contracts

  10. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP MMS Decommissioning Regulations • Require removal of “installations” and “obstructions” upon termination of the lease • Apply to “lessees,” “owners of operating rights” and “the person actually performing the activity to which the requirement applies”

  11. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Nairobi Convention • Applies to wrecks in the Exclusive Economic Zone • “Hazard to navigation” • Danger or impediment to navigation • “may reasonably be expected to result in major harmful consequences to the marine environment, or damage to the coastline or related interests . . ..” • Exceptions for war, sole cause willful act of third party, negligence of government in maintaining navigation aids

  12. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Coverage for ROW/D • First party property coverage • P&I insurance • Excess liability insurance

  13. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP First Party Property Coverage

  14. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP P&I Coverage: “Compulsory by law”

  15. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Coverage under traditional marine P&I policies • Seaboard Shipping Corp. v. Jocharanne Tugboat Corp.: “compulsory removal” . . . refers to a situation in which a hull has been abandoned by the owner and the hull underwriter but, pursuant to government order, must be removed from navigable waters”

  16. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Progress Marine, Inc. v. Foremost Ins. Co. • “where failure to remove would have reasonable [sic] exposed an insured to liability imposed by law sufficiently great to justify the expense of removal”

  17. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Continental Oil Co. v. Bonanza Corp. (“The AQUA SAFARI”) • “To be compelling, the duty must be clear and the sanctions for its violation both established and sufficiently severe to be impelling, that is to warrant the cost of removal.” • “[R]emoval occasioned by a reasonable apprehension of slight consequences for inaction or by an unreasonable apprehension even of grave consequences is not compelled.” • To be compulsory there must be “a clear legal obligation to remove, imposed by statute or by judicial decision.” • “[D]uty must be present and unconditional, not remote and contingent.”

  18. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Grupo Protexa, S.A. v. All American Marine Slip (“The HUICHOL”) • “[R]emoval is considered compulsory by law if either 1) the removal is directed by governmental order, statute or regulation or 2) if removal is reasonable under a cost-benefit analysis taking into consideration the probable cost of removal and both the likelihood and amount of liability which could be imposed for failing to remove the wreck.

  19. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Summary • Removal is “compulsory by law” when • applicable statute or valid order requires removal • owner faces liability in tort and the likelihood of liability and the potential consequences are sufficient to outweigh the cost of removal. • Removal is not compulsory when there is an invalid order, the statute does not apply, or the concerns about civil liability are not reasonable.

  20. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Coverage under “broad form” ROW/D clauses • “when removal is compulsory by law, statute or regulation, when required by contract, or when necessary for the Assured’s/Operator’s operations.”

  21. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP Coverage for ROW/D under excess liability policies: square pegs in round holes • “liability imposed upon the insured by law or assumed under contract . . . for damages . . . on account of . . . property damage”

  22. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP “for damages” • Are removal costs incurred by the insured “damages”? • Guidance in environmental cases

  23. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP “on account of property damage”

  24. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP “imposed by law” • Liability that would exist in the absence of contract or agreement • Wreck Act? • Tort liability? • MMS regulations?

  25. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP “assumed under contract” • “indemnification and hold harmless agreements, whereby the insured agrees to ‘assume’ the tort liability of another” • Drilling contracts • Offshore mineral leases

  26. LLB&L Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP New Wordings

More Related