1 / 18

Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection

Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection. Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council. Water Resources in the USA Total Withdrawals. WA. ND. MT. MN. 8. ME. NH. 1. SD. WI. VT. OR. 10. 2. ID. WY. MI. NY. MA. IA. NE. 7. 5.

elegette
Download Presentation

Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council

  2. Water Resources in the USA Total Withdrawals

  3. WA ND MT MN 8 ME NH 1 SD WI VT OR 10 2 ID WY MI NY MA IA NE 7 5 3 RI PA CT NV OH IN NJ IL UT CO 9 KS MO DE WV MD KY VA CA TN NC OK AR AZ NM SC GA MS 6 AL 4 AK LA $Billions TX < $10 FL 9 10 GU $10 - $20 HI $20 - $30 $30 - $40 $40 - $50 > $50 Infrastructure Costs 20 Year Drinking Water and Clean Water Infrastructure Needs by EPA Region

  4. Effects of Growth Water Resources and Population Growth, 2000-2020 Source: DOE/NETL (M. Chan, July 2002)

  5. 600,000 people and over 200,000 homes per year

  6. Residential Water Usage Source: AWWRF Residential End Uses of Water, 1999

  7. AB 2717 • Became law September, 2004 • CUWCC formed Landscape Task Force to review landscape water issues, make recommendations for improvements • Representatives from water suppliers, landscape & building industries, cities & counties, environmental groups, and state & federal agencies

  8. We Finished It! • 43 recommendations • 76 specific actions to implement the recommendations • Top 12 • AB 1881 submitted

  9. New Technology Programs Et Weather Data For Irrigation Scheduling

  10. The Study Area

  11. Study Objectives • Characterize Runoff Quantity and Water Quality • Dry Weather • Storm Conditions • Evaluate Methods of Reducing Runoff

  12. Study Design Control Neighborhood #1 Control Neighborhood #2 Control Neighborhood #3 Flows to San Diego Creek and Newport Bay Retrofit and Education Neighborhood Education Neighborhood = Water quality and flow monitoring locations

  13. Study Findings • 41.2 gpd saved annual average with ET controllers and education • 25.6 gpd saved with education • 64-71% runoff flow reduction in combined area • 79% runoff reduction in one specific neighborhood

  14. Study Implications • Landscape water not just a drought issue or even a peaking issue • Multiple environmental benefits of regional and statewide significance • An important partner in basin management: Runoff reduction, pollutant reduction, reduced wastewater treatment, reduced green waste management

  15. Green Building Issues • LEED (USGBC) only awards 6 points for water efficiency • LEED Water Efficiency Technical Advisory Group working to make significant improvements (Council participation) • Other green building initiatives similarly weak on water efficiency • “California Friendly” and “Smart from the Start” pilot programs in California

  16. California Friendly “ Active Family”

More Related