90 likes | 223 Views
Current State of HECM Program. Record volumes130,000 originations expected this yearAbsence of proprietary, jumbo" products so HECMs = the reverse mortgage marketAdministration has requested that Congress appropriate approximately $800 million to the HECM ProgramAfter negative subsidies (pro
E N D
1. Managing the HECM Challenge MBA’s Reverse Mortgage Lending Conference
September 10, 2009
Joe Kelly, New View Advisors
Chris Mullins, American Advisors Group
Chris Witeck, BuckleySandler LLP
2. Current State of HECM Program Record volumes
130,000 originations expected this year
Absence of proprietary, “jumbo” products so HECMs = the reverse mortgage market
Administration has requested that Congress appropriate approximately $800 million to the HECM Program
After negative subsidies (“profits”) of $462 million in FY 2008 and $697 million in FY 2007.
Budget prepared annually, not cumulative
Declining property values
3. Current State of HECM Program (cont.)
Fannie Mae still has approximately 90% of the market despite raising margins
Fannie also needs a cash injection
$10.7 billion according to recent filing
What is its role going forward?
Ginnie Mae HMBS setting new records each month
Fixed-rate product
4. Concerns Raised
Potential for public and political support of HECM Program to erode should ongoing positive subsidies be necessary
Fees increased
Borrowing amounts reduced
What can be done to ensure sustainability of the HECM Program?
Fannie Mae’s role
5. Common Perceptions HECMs make money for the government (MIP)
Excess values have given the program cushion against “crossover loss”
ARMs protect more than fixed-rate products because borrowers don’t always draw the full amount with ARMs
HECMs have high fees
Things will get worse before they get better
6. Cumulative HPA vs. HECM Issuance
NAR/Existing S&P/CS # HECMs
Homes Index Originated
2000 (1Q) 21% 42% 6,640
2001 14% 26% 8,127
2002 6% 18% 14,181
2003 -2% 5% 21,636
2004 -11% - 6% 47,266
2005 -21% -20% 48,493
2006 -21% -30% 85,639
2007 -20% -30% 108,293
2008 -12% -21% 115,176
2009 (2Q) 0% 0%
7. Loss Mitigation or Lost Mitigation?