1 / 5

Estimating the patient’s contribution during robot-assisted therapy

Estimating the patient’s contribution during robot-assisted therapy. Marco Guidali, PhD; Urs Keller, MSc; Verena Klamroth-Marganska, MD; Tobias Nef, PhD; Robert Riener, PhD. Aim

eliana-odom
Download Presentation

Estimating the patient’s contribution during robot-assisted therapy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Estimating the patient’s contribution during robot-assisted therapy Marco Guidali, PhD; Urs Keller, MSc; Verena Klamroth-Marganska, MD; Tobias Nef, PhD; Robert Riener, PhD

  2. Aim • Develop methods to quantify patient’s contribution during robot-assisted therapy by combining kinematic measures and the motor assistance applied. • Relevance • Assistive robots with sophisticated controllers are used in neurorehabilitation to assist and cooperate with the patient during therapy. • Difficult for patient to judge to what extent robot contributes to execution of movement.

  3. Method • Created inverse dynamic models of robot and passive human arm to: • Calculate required torques to move robot and arm. • Build, together with recorded motor torque, metric (in percentage) that represents patient’s contribution to movement. • Evaluated metric with 12 nondisabled subjects and 7 patients with neurological problems.

  4. Results • Compared results with common performance metric. • Estimation shows very satisfying results for both groups, even though arm model was strongly simplified.

  5. Conclusion • Displaying this metric to patients during therapy might motivate them to actively participate in training.

More Related