340 likes | 526 Views
Efficacy in CB 1 Cannabinoid Receptor Signal Transduction. Allyn Howlett, Ph.D. Neuroscience/Drug Abuse Research Program J. L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute North Carolina Central University Supported by Natl Institute on Drug Abuse. NIDA November, 2003.
E N D
Efficacy in CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Signal Transduction Allyn Howlett, Ph.D. Neuroscience/Drug Abuse Research Program J. L. Chambers Biomedical/Biotechnology Research Institute North Carolina Central University Supported by Natl Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA November, 2003 Frontiers in Addiction Research .
Cannabinoid Receptor Subtypes • CB1 • Found in neuronal cells and brain; other non-innervated tissue? • Regulates neurotransmitter release • CB1(A) • Splice variant mRNA found in human brain, but not predicted in rodent gene (Sanofi Recherche) • Similar pharmacology and signal transduction as CB1 • CB2 • Found in immune tissue (B cells, macrophages, T cells) • Activity not fully characterized • CB?? or CB? • ? Antinociceptive effects of anandamide inCB1 (-/-) mice (Martin) • ? Vascular effects of anandamide not reproduced by other agonists (Kunos)
CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor Herkenham et al. (1991) J. Neurosci. 11: 563
CB1 Cannabinoid Receptor, A G-Protein Coupled Receptor EC2 EC3 EC1 extracellular intracellular IC1 IC2 IC3 3D structure recently determined (Biochemistry 2002, 41, 11344)
Homology Model of the CB1 Receptor extracellular E2 loop as a part of binding site intracellular Biopolymers(Peptide Sciences), 2003, 71, 169-189
Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists • Classical Cannabinoid (ABC-tricyclic) • Nonclassical Cannabinoid (AC-bicyclic; ACD-tricyclic) • CP55940; CP55244 (Pfizer) • Aminoalkylindole • WIN55212-2 (Sterling Research Inst.) • Eicosanoid • Arachidonylethanolamide (anandamide) • 2-Arachidonoylglycerol • Aryl Pyrazole analogs • Organon analogs (Razdan and Martin)
Some Other EndoCannabinoids >141 2.5 O OH OH O O OH OH 2-Arachidonylglyceryl ether (noladin ether) 2-Arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) O CB1/CB2 Affiniy Ratio OH O ??? Devane et al. (1992) Science 258: 1946 Mechoulam et al. (1995) Biochem. Pharmacol. 50: 83 Hanus et al. (2001) PNAS 98: 3662 Porter et al. (2002) J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 301: 1020 O-Arachidonoyl ethanol ester (Virodhamine)
CB1 Receptor Signal Via Gi/o Proteins Signal Transduction Effector G protein Subunit Ion Channels K+ currents Gi (1,2,3? Via cAMP?) Ca2+ currents Gi or Go beta-gamma? Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Gi (1,2,3?) beta-gamma? or Go(1,2)? Other? PLA2 ? Ca2+ mobility? Focal Adhesion Kinase? PI3Kinase? NO synthesis? Sphingomyelin hydrolysis and ceramide?
Adenylyl Cyclase (types 5,6) Gi (1,2,3?)alpha (types 1,3,8 to inhibit? Or types 2,4,7 to stimulate?) 250 N18TG2 Cells C6 glioma Cells 105 75 CB1 R 50 35 CP52444 CP55940 D9-THC CBN CBD (+)isomers
Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit N-typeCa2+ currents in differentiated N18 neuroblastoma cells Mackie et al., Mol.Phm.44:498’93
Cannabinoid Agonist-induced MAPK Phosphorylation Signal Transduction via Gi/o N18TG2 Neuroblastoma Cells - - - + + + Pertussis Toxin - + Serum MA WIN CP MA WIN CP C6 Glioma Cells + - + - + - Pertussis Toxin - + Serum WIN55212 Methanan- damide CP55940
CP55940 and Methanandamide induce Nitric Oxide (NO) production in N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells Control CP55940 Methanandamide L-NNA + Methanandamide
CB1 Receptor Signaling via G-proteins • The domains of the CB1 receptor selective for interaction with G-proteins • Agonists can affect CB1 receptor – G-protein association differentially • Speculation on conformational induction & G-protein activation
Peptides Derived from the Intracellular CB1 Receptor Peptides Synthesized from the IL3 and C-terminal Domains CB1301 begins IL3;3 peptides span the loop CB1401 begins at membrane interface, extend beyond cys-palmitoyl anchor
Peptide CB1401 Disrupts the Association Between CB1 Receptor and Gi3 but not Gi1 or Gi2 in Rat Brain Membrane Extracts Gi1 Gi2 Gi3 Peptide 401: - + - + - +
Peptide CB1401 Disrupts the CB1 Receptor Association with Go but not Gi1/2 in Rat Brain Membrane Extracts
Peptide CB1401 Disrupts the Association Between CB1 Receptor and Gi3 but not Gi1 or Gi2 in Rat Brain Membrane Extracts Gi1 Gi2 Gi3 Peptide 401: - + - + - +
Peptides from IL3 Disrupt the CB1R Association with Gi1 & 2 but not Gi3 in N18TG2 membrane extracts CB1R Gi alpha IL3 peptides: - + - + - + • Conclusions • CB1 Receptor-G alpha complexes exist in the absence of agonists, but can be disrupted by pertussis toxin or GTP analogs. • The juxtamembrane C-terminal domain is involved in the association with Go & Gi3, but not Gi1 & G2. • CB1 IL3 domain is involved in the association • with Gi1 & Gi2 but not Gi3.
CB1 Receptor Signaling via G-proteins • The domains of the CB1 receptor selective for interaction with G-proteins • Agonists can affect CB1 receptor – G-protein association differentially • Speculation on conformational induction & G-protein activation
Conformational changes in the intracellular surface may direct interaction with selective G proteins
CB1 Receptor Signaling via G-proteins • The domains of the CB1 receptor selective for interaction with G-proteins • Agonists can affect CB1 receptor – G-protein association differentially • Speculation on conformational induction & G-protein activation
CP55244 Binding Model Biopolymers(Peptide Sciences), 2003, 71, 169 Assumption: H-bonding between K3.28(192) and phenolic OH blue/green: less lipophilic brown: more lipophilic
WIN55212-2 Binding Model aroyl-up1 TM5 TM3 TM2 TM7 aroyl-down1
WIN55212-2 and CP55244 Binding to CB1 Receptor E(258) K3.28(192) Y5.39(275) T5.38(274) F5.42(278) V3.32(196) CP55244WIN55212-2 H-bonding:
G-protein Activation Mechanism by Receptor Conformational Change By breaking H-bonding network By breaking H-bonding network WIN55212-2 CP55244 By breaking hydrophobic interaction
Conformational Induction of R-G Complex by A Response Phosphorylation by GRK Arrestin association Internalization
Agonist Directed “Trafficking” of Signal Transduction Response 1 Response 2 A1 A2 Response 3 Inverse Agonist Response A3 InARiG InA
` • Signal transduction pathways will depend upon the G-proteins and effector pathways present in the cell. • Domain specificity for G-proteins suggests that induction or selection of different conformations of the CB1 receptor can direct selective signal transduction pathways. • CB1 receptor signaling through a given pathway may be directed by agonist-specific conformational changes in the receptor.
Prospectus • Few CB receptor subtypes limits use of pharmacophoric distinctions in ligand affinities to separate therapeutic from untoward effects. • Can we develop agonists that induce receptor conformations that activate specific G proteins ? • Manipulation of G protein coupling may promote signal transduction pathways limited to cell types that regulate therapeutic responses.
Collaborators & Acknowledgements • JLC-BBRI at NCCU Derek Norford, Skyla Carney, Abdel-Azim Assi John Joong-Youn Shim Somnath Mukhopadhyay CMDNJ-RWJMS William Welsh J Nehru Univ, Delhi Sudha Cowsik • $$ National Institute on Drug Abuse