1 / 11

Update on impedance of enamel flanges in SPS

Update on impedance of enamel flanges in SPS. B . Salvant and V. Vaccaro for the ICE impedance team 12/05/2011. Many thanks to E. Shaposhnikova and M. Jimenez. Context. 2 flanges coated by a small layer of isolating material ( enamel+vetronite ) at each side of each BPM.

elisa
Download Presentation

Update on impedance of enamel flanges in SPS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on impedance of enamel flanges in SPS B. Salvant and V. Vaccarofor the ICE impedance team 12/05/2011 Many thanks to E. Shaposhnikova and M. Jimenez

  2. Context • 2 flanges coated by a small layer of isolating material (enamel+vetronite) at each side of each BPM. • Geometry is not trivial and small layers are hard to simulate with 3D codes • Theory of impedance of inserts has been recently implemented by Shobuda et al (HB2010).

  3. geometry Many warnings in CST due to mesh cells filled with PEC

  4. Simpler geometry for a hexahedral mesh square flange

  5. Comparison between square and round (real longitudinal)

  6. Low frequency peak? • More details in the talk with V. Vaccaro tomorrow at the impedance meeting With longer bunch: wake looks like the charge and discharge of a capacitor: physical?

  7. First tests indicate that peak at low frequency is proportional to the capacitance of the insert

  8. Transverse impedance (for 5 mm displacement) Peaks at about 200 MHz For all 436 flanges. Not accounting for the beta functions Z(low freq)~ 0.3/0.005*436 ~26 kOhm/m

  9. Summary • Difficult simulations, should be crosschecked with ABCI and Shobuda’s formula. • What isolation is really in the machine (thickness? EM properties? Ageing?) However: • Small transverse single bunch effects expected (as bunch length is small). • Longitudinal effects and resonances at ~200 MHz to be followed up. • These isolating inserts should be much more detrimental to machines with longer bunches

More Related