1 / 11

GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues

GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues. Non-pointing Photon Meeting September 21 2009 Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP. GMSB2 Trigger Study. Explore trigger levels for two EF configurations: EF_3J60 L1 = 3J18  Study radial dependence L2 = 3J35  Study radial dependence EF_3J180

elita
Download Presentation

GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GMSB Trigger Efficiency and Data Stream Issues Non-pointing Photon Meeting September 21 2009 Bruce Schumm, UCSC/SCIPP

  2. GMSB2 Trigger Study Explore trigger levels for two EF configurations: EF_3J60 L1 = 3J18  Study radial dependence L2 = 3J35  Study radial dependence EF_3J180 L1 = 3J70  Study radial dependence L2 = 3J120

  3. GMSB2 Trigger Study Borrow code from Jovan to evaluate triggers. Overall efficiency Ratio of triggered events to total Radial Dependence Divide histograms of radius of 0 decay accumulated separately for triggered and un-triggered events NOTE: Two 0 decays per event!

  4. GMSB2 Trigger Efficiencies L1_3J18 88.9% L2_3J35 85.5% EF_3J60 75.7% _______________________________________ L1_3J70 63.7% L2_3J120 60.0% EF_3J180 48.5%

  5. Triggered Events All events GMSB2 L1_3J18 (Radius in mm) Ratio

  6. Triggered Events All events Triggered Events All events GMSB2 L2_3J35 (Radius in mm) Ratio Ratio

  7. Triggered Events All events GMSB2 L1_3J70 (Radius in mm) Ratio

  8. L1_3J70 (repeat of last page) L1_3J70 with all conversions eliminated L1_3J70, no conversions; efficiency vs. Pt of 0

  9. Eliminate long-lived 0 (Rdec < 560 mm) L1_3J70 (repeat of last page) L1_3J70 with all conversions eliminated L1_3J70, no conversions; efficiency vs. Pt of 0

  10. RPV/LL DPD Data Steam Study What is the proposed RPV/LL Data Stream? It’s an OR of several triggers, ANDed with an OR of several offline requirements: Triggers: L1_MU40 OR L1_J120 OR L1_J70_XE30 OR stau, ORg55_tight OR2g17i_tight OR2g20 OR 3j60 Offline Cuts:One muon with pT > 40 GeV OR 3 jets with ET > 100 GeV OR One photon with ET > 20 GeV Question: Do these requirements bias the resulting sample in 0 momentum or decay length?  Compare GMSB3 distributions before and after selection

  11. Comparison of GMSB3 Before and After Selection L1_3J70 (repeat of last page) RDec After Selection PT After Selection L1_3J70 with all conversions eliminated After/Before After/Before

More Related