1 / 16

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics. Bram Boroson , Clayton State University, 3/20/2013. Fox and Hedgehog. “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one BIG thing.” F ar-out ideas and amusing stories to tell But also one BIG thing to communicate.

eliza
Download Presentation

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics Bram Boroson, Clayton State University, 3/20/2013

  2. Fox and Hedgehog • “The fox knows many things, but the hedgehog knows one BIG thing.” • Far-out ideas and amusing stories to tell • But also one BIG thing to communicate

  3. Quantum Physicist Eugene Wigner (1902-1995): Mathematics is “Unreasonably Effective”

  4. E=mc2, c is speed of light, a large number • So there is LOTS of Energy in Mass • But nobody trying to release energy would START by inventing equations or multiplication table

  5. The Big Problem • Math WORKS in science • NOT like a hammer works in hitting nails • Over and over math was invented “for kicks and giggles” and yet proved useful • Something about math? Or our world?

  6. Imaginary Friends • Little could seem more useless than “imaginary numbers” • We start learning math with counting • Then fractions, negative numbers • Irrational numbers • Every equation has a solution

  7. Quantum mechanics, time

  8. Quarternions, Spin 1/2

  9. Math: appeal of the General? • Maybe math works because it’s abstract • By talking about “2 plus 2” instead of apples, oranges, you can use it for apples OR oranges • To me this doesn’t seem to be good enough

  10. Max Tegmark’s MUH • Mathematical Universe Hypothesis: our world IS mathematics • Seems strange, radical! • “Mathematical Platonism”: math exists apart from us in its own world • We “discover” math truth using our minds instead of senses • Occam’s razor: isn’t it simpler if LESS exists?

  11. Our world’s math, but which Math? • Do all mathematical systems describe possible worlds? • Max Tegmark: only computable worlds • If our world is a mathematical world “pulled at random out of a hat”, what’s in the hat? Alan Turing

  12. Leibniz: Principle of Sufficient Reason • One approach: the world is a special mathematical OBJECT • What we can say about it only approximates what it is • It’s singled out among other possible objects • Nature never makes an arbitrary choice

  13. Principle of Sufficient Reason • Example in physics: infinite line charge • Much of modern physics is written in terms of maximizing/minimizing an “action” • Light bending (refracting) when passing through glass or water: minimizes the time it takes to go from A to B

  14. Principle of Sufficient Reason • Einstein’s General Relativity • Problem of rotating spheres, centrifugal forces, and bulges • Another example of Unreasonable Effectiveness: Tensor Calculus • Principle of Sufficient Reason FAIL: Quantum Mechanics (Stern-Gerlach Experiment)

  15. Approach 2: (early) Wittgenstein • “The world is made of facts, not things; each fact could be different and all the others the same” • 1, 2 prove 3… or 1, 3 prove 2? • But then WHY is our world so special that there are ANY laws?

  16. My own approach • Symbols of mathematics are “formal” • Geometry could be about “points, lines, planes” or “tables, chairs, desks” • The symbols may be reinterpreted • This property naturally allows for “axiom schema” • “Facts” don’t stay put: allow symbols to be re-interpreted

More Related