1 / 4

New Fields in Discovery Responses

New Fields in Discovery Responses. John L. Hufferd. Questions. Value of having a connection type in the discovery response Value of having speed indicator (perhaps relative) in the discovery response Some have said this would be valuable Value of having a preference indicator

elizabethjenkins
Download Presentation

New Fields in Discovery Responses

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Fields in Discovery Responses John L. Hufferd

  2. Questions • Value of having a connection type in the discovery response • Value of having speed indicator (perhaps relative) in the discovery response • Some have said this would be valuable • Value of having a preference indicator • Perhaps instead of a speed indicator • Some have said that this is useful even with speed value

  3. Possible Syntax Examples • Target Name, IP:Port[, PGN[,Type[,Speed[, Preference]]]] • PGN- Portal Group Number (in RFC3720) • Type – 0- nn {IANA registered values} • 0 = iSCSI • 1 = iWARP • 2 = IB • 3 = … • Speed – 1x, 2x, 4x, etc • Preference – 0 – n {Higher value is higher preference}

  4. Compatibility • Need to come up with a method for being compatible with previous implementations • Perhaps a new field in the Request • SendTargets command with new filed • Example: SendTargets <iSCSI-target-name>[,TSP] • Where TSP stands for Type, Speed, Preference

More Related