1 / 13

Programming and Evaluation

Programming and Evaluation. Facilitated by Dave Lohrmann and Jim O’Neil (aka Data Man). By the end of this session, learners will be able to:. Explain the progression of CSHP implementation; Recall the primary focus of Michiana as systemic change for sustainable CSHP;

ellis
Download Presentation

Programming and Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Programming and Evaluation Facilitated by Dave Lohrmann and Jim O’Neil (aka Data Man)

  2. By the end of this session, learners will be able to: • Explain the progression of CSHP implementation; • Recall the primary focus of Michiana as systemic change for sustainable CSHP; • Distinguish between two branches of evaluation; • Review their team’s progress to date and determine next steps.

  3. EvaluatingCSHP Implementation from Start to Finish (Part 1)

  4. CSHP Logic Model for School Districts ACTIVITIES SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES LONG-TERM OUTCOMES INPUTS OUTPUTS • Local CSHP • Infrastructure • Routinized • Secure Authorization • and Funding • External Funds • Local Funds • CSHP Policy • Component Policies Consistent with Best Practice • Review and Adoption Procedures • Assign Qualified Personnel • Component Staff • Administrator/ Coordinator • Internal Champion • Access Resources • Information Management Systems • Surveillance Data • Management Systems • Telecomm Systems • Training Systems and Workshops • Establish Communication and Linkages • School Health Team across components • School Health Coordinating Council • Between School District, Local Health Dept, and Community Providers • Stakeholders • Advocates • External Change Agent Engages Local School Corporations • Funding Source • Guidance • Federal Funds • State Funds • Private Funds • Professional Development • Awareness • Needs Assessment • Planning • Advocacy • Policy and Environmental Change • CSHP Development • Component Improvement • Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment • Technical Assistance • Needs Assessment • Policy and Environmental Change • Planning • CSHP Development • Component Improvement • Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment • Networking • Advocates • Stakeholders • Experts • Well-prepared and qualified teachers and staff • High Quality Curricula, Programs, and Services Across the Eight CSHP Components Selected or Developed and Delivered to Students, School Staff, and Families • CSHP Components • Coordinated Internally • Common Vision and Mission • Shared Resources • Joint Planning • Regular Meetings • Ongoing Communication • Public Health and Community Providers • Engaged • Joint Planning • Shared Resources • Ongoing • Communication • Approved Referral Systems Improved HealthAssessment Scores More Positive Health Attitudes Greater Intentions to Behave in Healthy Ways Positive In-School Health Behavior Changes Positive Out-of School Behavior Changes Improved Academic Achievement Scores Decreased Drop-Out Rates Better School Attendance Sustained Positive Health Behaviors Reduced Population Chronic Disease Reduced Population Infectious Disease Better Control of Health Care Costs Improved Community Health Increased Graduation Rates Improved Health Status and Quality of Life Elimination of Health Disparities Enhanced Economic Productivity

  5. Evaluation Concepts* • Evaluation is the act of placing a value, positive or negative, on something. • A less than full positive value implies that the object of the evaluation can be improved through some change. • The responsibility of the evaluator is to be an agent of change: working to improve a program in the many ways identified by evaluation results” • From Windsor, R., Baranowski, T., Clark, N., and Cutter, G. (1994). Evaluation of health promotion, health education, and disease prevention programs. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield publishing Co., p. 29.

  6. Two Branches of Evaluation • 1. CSHP (HSRC Characteristics 1-2) • A. Coordination, including essential structures AND • Policy, Planning • and Evaluation • 2. Separate aspects (HSRC Characteristics 3-11) • A. CSHP characteristics OR • B. Health issues across components/characteristics

  7. Where should we be now?

  8. RELATIONSHIP BETWEENSTATUS/INVENTORY ASSESSMENT, PROGRAM PLAN, PROCESS EVALUATION & PROGRAM GOAL GOAL = CSHP PROGRAM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS/INVENTORY ASSESSMENT (FORMATIVE EVALUATION) CONTINUOUS PROCESS EVALUATION 2-5 YEARS

  9. Implementation Guidance • Pre-Planning • Organizing • Orienting • Scoring • Reporting • Using results-- HSIP Author: David K. Lohrmann Engage and/or involve key school and community decision makers and stakeholders in every step!!!!!

  10. Reporting (pp. 111-113) • Generate ASCD output report (color-coded priorities) • Prepare work group summaries • Share across work groups • Draft overall summary report • Disseminate report

  11. Use Results(pp. 125-127) • Develop a plan based on prioritized recommendations • Use planning charts • Implement over time • Track progress (process evaluation)

  12. Progress Curve You are here Begin Year 1 Year 2 Year 3

  13. To Be Continued

More Related