1 / 6

Ongoing evaluation 2007-13 Programming Period DG REGIO - Evaluation Unit

Ongoing evaluation 2007-13 Programming Period DG REGIO - Evaluation Unit. Ongoing evaluation: an integrated management tool. shift from regulation-driven to needs-driven evaluation (flexible approach) process: a series of evaluation exercises

joshuadaniels
Download Presentation

Ongoing evaluation 2007-13 Programming Period DG REGIO - Evaluation Unit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ongoing evaluation 2007-13 Programming Period DG REGIO - Evaluation Unit

  2. Ongoing evaluation:an integrated management tool • shift from regulation-driven to needs-driven evaluation (flexible approach) • process: a series of evaluation exercises • stronger links between monitoring and evaluation + these two exercises and decision-making • periodicity and regularity • strategic and operational nature • forward-looking approach: organisation and use EVALUATION PLAN in parallel with programming

  3. Evaluation PlanArt. 48.1 • Coordination • Links between monitoring and evaluation (periodicity / regularity of these exercises) • Human resources and steering group • Capacity building • Revision mechanism • Evaluation activities • Flexibility: thematic scope, timeframe, human and financial resources • Potential use -> at national and programme level -> whole programming period + annual sections Suggested outline: Annex 1

  4. Regulatory Requirements (I) Flexible Arrangements: scope, design, timing but – evaluation required: (Art. 48.3) • Where the monitoring systems reveal a significant departure from the goal initially set • financial + physical monitoring data Priorities: outputs and resultsindicators: Art. 37.1(c) • 10%-20% departure (specific features of OP, scale of intervention – proportionality principle) • “early warning mechanism”: timely to facilitate programme adjustments • annual reporting: Art. 67 (by 30 June, first time in 2008)

  5. Draft Commission Regulation Rules for Implementation of Council Regulation 1083/2006 + 1080/2006 Annex XVIII: Annual and Final Reporting Overview of the implementation of OP For each quantifiable indicator mentioned in OP and in particular the core indicators 2008 2009 …. 2015 • Achievement • Target • Baseline

  6. Regulatory Requirements (II) • When programme revisions are proposed Art. 48.3  Art. 33 Proposals for revision stem from regular monitoring and evaluation Major changes: • Financial: between priority axes, Commission approval required • Content-related: revision of objectives at programme or priority level • Implementation-related: e.g. new processes, major re-structuring Reasons to revise (Art. 33.1): • Significant socio-economic changes in programme environment • Major changes in Community, national or regional priorities • Monitoring reveals a significant departure from the goals initially set • Implementation difficulties

More Related