590 likes | 877 Views
The Matrix. List of Questions for Audience Participation. How many have seen the Matrix? How many have seen the Matrix multiple times? How many of you saw a different movie each time? How many wish I would just show the Matrix?. How many of you wish that John would have chosen the BLUE pill?.
E N D
List of Questions for Audience Participation • How many have seen the Matrix? • How many have seen the Matrix multiple times? • How many of you saw a different movie each time? • How many wish I would just show the Matrix?
How many of you wish that John would have chosen the BLUE pill?
Blatant Plagiarism • MIT Sloan School • Managing Technical Professionals and Organizations • Ralph Katz, Tom Allen http://mitsloan.mit.edu/execed/specialexec/courses/tech-profs-orgs.htm
Blatant Plagiarism • More stuff
Why a Matrix? • When Functional? • When Project? • What Balance?
Basic Issues Influencing Organizational Structure • Knowledge Management • Systems/ • Integration • Resource Allocation • Reward • Structures
Types of Knowledge • Market Knowledge • Technical Knowledge
The Process of Innovation Input Output Technology Innovation Market
Functional/Departmental/Input Organization Technology D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Market
Project/Output Organization Technology P1 P2 Market P3
Departmental Closely mapped to the supporting technologies Better connections to technological innovation Less coordination of project tasks and less responsiveness to market change Project Different disciplines united for a common purpose Strong coordination of the project tasks and able to react to market dynamics Accomplished at the cost of separation from the disciplinary knowledge. At an extreme, leads to technology erosion. Department vs. Project
Matrix Organization Technology D2 D3 D4 D5 P1 Market P2 P3
Matrix Organization Technology D2 D3 D4 D5 P1 Market P2 P3
Creative(?) Tension • Functional managers want to improve technology • Shipping product gets in the way • Project managers want to ship product • Don’t give a damn about improving technology
What are the drivers that determine Matrix balance? • Rate of Change of Technology • Rate of Change of Market • Interdependence of Functional Groups • Interdependence of Projects
Rate of Change of Technology • If Technology is changing rapidly, then there is a need to maximize the flow of technology knowledge. Technology Innovation Market
Rate of Change of Market • A dynamic market requires an organization that is geared to shipping product and which is tightly connected to the market. Technology Innovation Market
Market and Technology Change dM/dt and dT/dt Project Mission Impossible dM/dt Either Functional dT/dt
Mission Impossible Options • Make do with more mature technology • Acknowledge that keeping up with technology is more critical than market pressures • High performing matrix organization • Reduce the project time and cycle people into and out of the project
Interdependence of Functional Groups • When functional activities are highly interdependent, a structure which supports cross functional communication is required. D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 e.g. Development and Domain Science
Interdependence of Projects • When Projects require highly interdependent technologies, a structure which links the technologies through the projects is required. P1 P2 P3 e.g. OpenWorks Integration
Integration Project Matrix Functions Either Functional Projects
Functional Interdependence(function) Project dM/dt Functional dT/dt
Functional Interdependence(function) Project dM/dt Functional dT/dt
Project Interdependence(project) Project dM/dt Functional dT/dt
Project Interdependence(project) Project dM/dt Functional dT/dt
Types of Teams • Functional Teams • Lightweight Project Teams • Heavyweight Project Teams • Tiger Teams • Hybrid Teams
Functional Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Subprojects Well defined Interfaces
Lightweight Projects Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Proj Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason MSF/SOLID Team Structure
Heavyweight Projects Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Proj Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason
Tiger Teams Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Proj Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason Dept Liason
Hybrid Projects Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason Proj Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason
LGC Pre-Reorg Dept Mgr Dept Mgr Development, Product Geoscientists Dept Liason Dept Liason Proj Mgr Dept Liason Dept Liason Testing, User Education, Logistics
Project vs. Functional Project Tiger Teams Heavyweight Lightweight Functional
Technology Transfer • It is a “people process” • Transferring documentation is, at best, an auxiliary process. • People must be in direct contact and understand each other to transfer knowledge. • Moving people is the most effective way to move knowledge • Organizationally or Geographically • Organizational boundaries generate different cultures which impose serious barriers to the transfer of technology.
D P Probability of Communication
Communication Findings • Project influence (P) is typically greater than Department influence (D) • Communication Types • Project communication is most often Type I, Functional communication is Type II or Type III
Summary so far • Drivers influencing Organizational Balance • Technology change--dT/dt • Market change--dM/dt • Subsystem Interdependence--Function • Project Interdependence-- Project • Types of teams • Communication
Classic Unix Products dM/dt dT/dt How does this relate to Landmark? Project
New Paradigm dM/dt dT/dt How does this relate to Landmark? Mission Impossible
Reno – Mission Impossible? • Tiger team like • Short project duration • But…The overall project is long term • Multiple iterations (Tahoe, Carson City) • Constant refactoring and introduction of new technology will be required • Growing the teams will present challenges • Long term success will most likely require a migration from a Tiger team to a high performance matrix
What Problems Do We See? • One size fits all • Different Technology Maturities • Different Market Maturities • Different Integration Needs • We are in danger of replacing product silos with functional silos