1 / 18

Catalyzing 21st Century Growth : The Role of Innovative Cities

Catalyzing 21st Century Growth : The Role of Innovative Cities. May 8, 2012 | 10:00 AM EST Speaker: Shahid Yusuf Economic Advisor World Bank Institute. Why do Cities matter for Growth Economics?.

elom
Download Presentation

Catalyzing 21st Century Growth : The Role of Innovative Cities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Catalyzing 21st Century Growth: The Role of Innovative Cities May 8, 2012 | 10:00 AM EST Speaker: Shahid Yusuf Economic Advisor World Bank Institute

  2. Why do Cities matter for Growth Economics? • High rate of urbanization and secular trend because of “urban edge” in productivity and labor saving technological bias in agriculture. • Growing sectors are manufacturing and services, both urban based. • Increasing share of GDP sourced from urban areas. • Productive activities concentrated in few large cities e.g. Seoul, Bangkok, Cairo, Karachi, Sao Paolo.

  3. Sources of Growth • Supply based growth estimated through production functions: capital, labor and total factor productivity (TFP). For low and middle income countries, capital and TFP are the principal and complementary sources of growth (however, one must not ignore labor). • Demand based growth derived from: consumption, investment, and net exports. • Fast growing economies – national or local – rely on supply push that is supported by demand pull. The two must work together.

  4. Deconstructing (supply-side) Sources • Capital accumulation requires an enabling environment (national and local), entrepreneurship, and institutions for mobilizing (from internal and external sources) and efficiently channeling funds into productive uses in an urban milieu. • Productivity of labor depends upon supply of (and technological level of) capital equipment. • Gains in TFP function of allocative efficiency of state and markets, R&D, innovation, volume and quality of skills, management and technology absorption.

  5. Deconstructing the Demand-Side • Stable national-level macro-environment that smoothens cyclical fluctuations, contains inflationary pressures and minimizes risks from bubbles. • Expanding middle class (an urban phenomenon) that provides steadily growing consumption demand for standardized commodities and new products. • Culture and institutions encouraging entrepreneurship and enforcing property rights, thereby encouraging investment. • Trade and FDI policies supportive of openness and that promote exports. An open trading environment attracts FDI and stimulates exports.

  6. Enter Cities • Success of supply and demand side drivers of growth depends upon urban response to policies, market inducements and to opportunities. Agriculture a small and shrinking share of national product. • For most countries, GDP growth derives from performance of a few major cities. Recent trends and growth dynamics suggest that this concentration in the urban sources of growth will increase.

  7. When is a city an “engine of growth?” • “Engines” must account for a large share of GDP. • Size confers agglomeration and scale economies and contributes to innovativeness. • Industrial composition and diversity contributes to growth, its stability and exports. • Share of high-consuming middle class greater in large, industrially diversified cities. • “Engines” deliver stable, sustainable growth.

  8. Other Attributes of “Engines” • Engines are frequently capital cities and enjoy other geographical and historical advantages. • Growing “engines” house major universities and research entities, and accumulate labor and deep pools of skills from national and foreign sources. • Financial institutions concentrate in large cities • “Engines” attract FDI that contributes to industrial diversification and technology transfer. • “Engines” are open, internationally connected, exporting cities. • Large cities have broader tax bases and can mobilize more revenue to finance infrastructure and services.

  9. Lifecycles of “Engine” Cities: Stage 1 • Historically engines have started out as industrial centers and providers of administrative services (e.g. European engines). • In earlier stages, they absorb labor and capital from rural sector into more productive activities. • Fast growing engines rely on growth of manufacturing sector, and serve as trade and financial hubs (e.g. London, New York, Zurich).

  10. Lifecycle: Stage 2 • In maturing engines, manufacturing is superseded by producer services and creative industries however, manufacturing remains important source of employment, innovation and TFP (e.g. Seoul). • Innovation more broadly (including of services) acquires greater salience. • Exports remain an important driver of growth and of spillovers. • These cities continue to increase share of population and to attract skills and FDI (e.g. Tokyo). • ICT and transport infrastructure supporting connectivity has a larger role.

  11. Notable (new) Engines • Ho Chi Minh City, Shenzhen, Singapore and Seoul are four cities that highlight key attributes of engines. • Their emergence as engines is relatively recent: in the 1960s for Singapore and Seoul, in the 1980s for Shenzhen, and the 1990s for HCM City. • Location was key in all four cases, two were/are capitals/administrative centers.

  12. Ho Chi Minh City • Population (2010): 7.4 million (3 million in 1989) and increasing • GDP (2010): $24 billion (approx) • GDP growth 2000-2009: 10% approx. • GDP share (2010): 20% • Share of manufacturing: 30% • Share of exports: 40% • Share of FDI: 35% ($12.2 billion stock) • Internet penetration:2.2 million subscribers and 5.5 million users

  13. Shenzhen • Population rose from 50,000 in 1979 to 10.3 million in 2010 • GDP growth 15+ percent 2005- 2009 • GDP 2010: $141 billion+ • Export/GDP ratio: 1.45. China’s leading export city • FDI stock 2010: $30 billion • R&D/GDP in 2010: 3.4% • Transport hub: 4th largest container port in 2010 • Internet penetration rate (2011): 78%

  14. Singapore • Population rose from 650,000 in 1960 to 5 million in 2010 – 1.4 million were foreigners • GDP growth 2000 – 2010: 6.6% • Share of manufacturing in GDP: 22% • Export/GDP consistently high (2010): 1.58 • FDI (2010): $618.6 billion • R&D as percent of GDP: 3% • Major transport hub: 2nd largest container port 2010 • Internet usage (2010): 78% of population

  15. Seoul • Population 2010: 9.8 million (metro area 22.5 million) • GDP (2008): $291 billion (city share about 24%; metro area share of GDP is 48%) • GDP growth 2000- 2009: 4-5% approximately • Share of secondary industry in GDP (2003): 14% • Export/GDP • Skilled workforce: 50% have some tertiary education • R&D as percent of GDP (2005): 3.14% of GDP • Seoul/Incheon air transport hub (2010): 8th by international passenger traffic; 4th by world cargo traffic • Internet penetration (2010): 83%

  16. The Future of Engines • First mover, scale and agglomeration advantages can be enduring if supported by good governance/metropolitan management. • Innovation capacity advantages likely to strengthen – but most innovation will be incremental. • Can take the lead in greening growth, containing energy intensity (especially of urban transport) and introducing/producing new green technologies, products and services. • Urbanization economies, skill concentration facilitates diversification, buttresses export intensity.

  17. Bibliography • Edward Glaeser, 2011. Triumph of the City. New York, Penguin Press. • Margaret Pugh O’Mara, 2005. Cities of Knowledge. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press. • Robert P. Inman, 2009. Making Cities Work, Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press. • Joan Fitzgerald, 2010. Emerald Cities. New York, Oxford University Press. • John D. Kasarda and Greg Lindsay, 2011. Aerotropolis. New York, Farrar Straus and Giroux. • John Montgomery, 2007. The New Wealth of Cities. Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing.

  18. Thank You

More Related