1 / 5

SBAS DFMC Nav&XPL Equations Inputs to IWG#26

SBAS DFMC Nav&XPL Equations Inputs to IWG#26. 05 th Feb. 2014. Reminder from IWG#21 Open issues to address until IWG#27 Conclusion / possible way forward for ICD definition ICD definition. DFMC Nav&XPL equations. Reminder

elton-conner
Download Presentation

SBAS DFMC Nav&XPL Equations Inputs to IWG#26

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SBAS DFMC Nav&XPL EquationsInputs to IWG#26 05th Feb. 2014

  2. Reminder from IWG#21 • Open issues to address until IWG#27 • Conclusion / possible way forward for ICD definitionICD definition MSIL2

  3. DFMC Nav&XPL equations • Reminder • IWG#21 did not recommend to broadcast biases (effect of floor on VPL, penalizing for low VAL targets) • Morevoer DFMC ICD bandwidth nearly full for up to 91SV capability (i.e. not much place for additional parameters) •  Pro-SBAS starting assumption for XPL • SBAS L1 legacy like Nav+XPL equations are assumed to be re-conducted for DFMC (replacing broadcast iono corrections/GIVE by DF ionoterms) • Yet some issues have to be addressed (next slide) MSIL2

  4. DFMC Nav&XPL equations • Open issues to address until IWG#27 • Kh/Kv factor values : SBAS L1 legacy values re-conducted for DFMC or re-tuning of Kh/Kv values to recover perfo. margins? • Inter-system bias • Accurate estimation possible by system, yet necessitates to use Message Type H for navigation • Could be compensated by receiver (5th unknown) yet user estimation uncertainty possibly higher than by system  VPL penalty ? • Receiver inter signal bias • what bias size (likely dependent on the relative characteristics of the GNSS to augment : GPS/GAL receiver bias will differ GPS/GLO one) ? • Possible safety issue if bias not very small • How to handle this bias : by Rx spec or by Rx estimation? • what receiver complexity (incl. possible calibration) ? MSIL2

  5. DFMC Nav&XPL equations • Previous issues could be addressed until IWG#27 (work plan is being built by EPO/Pro-SBAS) in order to define DFMC baseline and system/receiver apportionment concerning Nav&XPL equations • Yet no major impact is expected for system performances (Kh/Kv tuning issue seems fine optimization, bias issue seems manageable thanks to SV redundancies in DFMC) MSIL2

More Related