1 / 20

Pay-For-Performance in Oklahoma

Pay-For-Performance in Oklahoma. The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Richard McKay Petroleum Storage Tank Division. Do you have a stalled cleanup ?. We realized we had many…. and here’s how!. Conducted $100,000 Case Reviews. The Football Field analogy.

elvis
Download Presentation

Pay-For-Performance in Oklahoma

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Pay-For-Performance in Oklahoma The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Richard McKay Petroleum Storage Tank Division

  2. Do you have a stalled cleanup ?

  3. We realized we had many…. and here’s how!

  4. Conducted $100,000 Case Reviews • The Football Field analogy. • Paying out money with little or no environmental results. • Reviewed our accountability. • We looked at Pay-For-Performance.

  5. ACCOUNTABILITY As a Regulatory Agency we have a fiduciary responsibility: • To safeguard public health, safety & the environment. • To safeguard public money.

  6. Why We Chose Pay-For-Performance • Needed a way to guarantee environmental results and move away from time & materials projects. • Wanted a method to impose cost control so total costs would not exceed the $1.MM cap per site. • Wanted a way to reduce disallowances. • Wanted a way to focus on results...not paperwork. • Wanted a way to shorten time to pay claims. • Needed way to better relations between the tank owner, consultant and regulatory/fund.

  7. We Began to Sign P-F-P Contracts • We took a voluntary approach beginning in 1996 with Consultants willing to take a risk and willing to guarantee environmental results. • Committed to 3 year contracts with a 2 warranty. • Payments are made based on attaining milestone contamination reductions. • Tank Owners supported P-F-P because: • Site restoration money wasencumbered. • They wanted Consultants who were willing to take a risk and guarantee their work.

  8. Resultsof P-F-P: Win-Win-Win • Our difficult sites are being cleaned because: • Better designed RA systems are being installed. • Consultants are guaranteeing results. • Site costs are coming down because: • Emphasis is on closing the site to make money rather than keeping site open to make money. • Attained cost control by using Tank RACER 99 to negotiate a fixed price to remediate a site. • Site remediation costs are encumbered. • Funds are paid only when milestones are achieved.

  9. P-F-P Program Results (cont’d) • Consultant disallowances reduced to almost zero. • Tank owners do not have disallowances. • Paperwork has been substantially reduced. • Time to pay has reduced to a few days. • Achieved collaboration between all parties. • The Consultant can make a reasonable profit and take pride in a job well done. • The Tank Owner is happy - He knows the cost and when he can get back to work.

  10. Other Results … Not Counted On • Pre-approval process became mandatory. • UST Advisory Council composed of Consultants and Tank Owners adopted: • Unit Costs for all work through site delineation. • Tank RACER 99 to price site remediation. • Pre-approvals requested faster than money comes in. • Hold cooperative Consultant/State training sessions. • Technical staff has more time to visit sites and track site remediation progress.

  11. How does the P-F-P process work? • Set clean-up levels based on Tier I or Tier II report. • Submit Remediation Technology Report. • Submit final Remedial Action Plan. • Submit Pay- For-Performance proposal. • Look at clean-up cost in $ / yd3. • Compare to similar sized systems & technology. • Run Tank RACER 99 to determine reasonable cost. • Negotiate the final set contract price and terms. • Sign the Pay-For-Performance contract.

  12. P-F-P Process Cont’d. • Next ... the Consultant installs the RA system. • Baseline groundwater samples are collected from pre-selected “Key Monitoring Wells” 2 weeks prior to system start-up. • Payments are made to the Consultant when decreases in groundwater contamination called “Milestones” are achieved. • Once all Milestones are achieved and contamination levels remains below “clean-up levels” for 6 months in all site wells the final payment is made.

  13. Progress & Results

  14. AS / SVE System Progress

  15. Potential Financial Savings

  16. Summary of Why We Chose Pay-For-Performance • ACCOUNTABILITY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. • ENVIRONMENTAL RESULTS ARE GUARANTEED AND ARE BEING ACHIEVED. • REMEDIATION COSTS ARE REASONABLE. • TANK OWNERS ARE WANTING IT. THANK YOU

More Related