70 likes | 270 Views
A Danish CGE model including uninsurable idiosyncratic earnings uncertainty. The transition. Building blocks of the model. Same basic structure as “the small model” Benchmark: A.K. OLG model with certainty Forward solution Government sector Endogenous labor supply. The model.
E N D
A Danish CGE model including uninsurable idiosyncratic earnings uncertainty The transition
Building blocks of the model • Same basic structure as “the small model” • Benchmark: A.K. OLG model with certainty • Forward solution • Government sector • Endogenous labor supply
The model • Satellite approach • 16 generations, (100 periods) • Danish progressive tax system • Simple Danish PAYG pension system • Backward solution: dynamic programming • Uninsurable idiosyncratic earnings uncertainty - Markov transition probabilities - Progressive taxes act as insurance device
Previous findings • A.K. : progressive taxes are bad • TWP : include idiosyncratic earnings uncertainty Compares two steady states: welfare increases when moving from a proportional to a progressive tax system
Critique • A.K. : certainty, agents have perfect foresight - the benchmark model • TWP: there may be welfare loss in the transition - very time demanding
Goal • A simpler model + a faster computer • (+ a faster program?) • Evaluate welfare change in transition • LSRA
Future agenda • Endogenous Markov transition probabilities and wage bargaining process • Endogenous unemployment probabilities and optimal insurance system • An optimal public sector (taxes, pensions) • Stochastic health shocks and optimal insurance system