1 / 7

Aid Alignment: Problems of Weak Performance, Conditionality, and Donor Predictability

Aid Alignment: Problems of Weak Performance, Conditionality, and Donor Predictability. Jan Walliser World Bank. Problem 1: Weak performance. Weak implementation of the PRS or sudden deterioration of a policy environment can endanger donor flows and undermine programs

elyse
Download Presentation

Aid Alignment: Problems of Weak Performance, Conditionality, and Donor Predictability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aid Alignment: Problems of Weak Performance, Conditionality, and Donor Predictability Jan Walliser World Bank

  2. Problem 1: Weak performance • Weak implementation of the PRS or sudden deterioration of a policy environment can endanger donor flows and undermine programs • Aid volatility may be enhanced further if all donors use identical performance indicators and withhold support for the same reason • Question is how and to what degree donor support can be modulated gradually in case of weak performance • Can donors shift from budget support to other, more tightly controlled, aid modalities?

  3. Problem 2 : Lack of predictability of donors funds • Donors may add conditions at a late stage, making timely implementation and disbursement difficult • Donors may be unable to adapt conditions to changing policy environments • Donors may firm up disbursement decisions only late in the budget cycle • Donors may be unable to complete their own internal cycles in time to disburse promised resources

  4. What governments should do • Actively manage donor harmonization and review processes to foster transparent and early decisionmaking • Establish regular budget, planning, and review cycles to allow better donor alignment • Program and sector review information feeds into government budgeting decisions • Encourage joint donor reviews coordinated with program/sector review

  5. What else governments could do • Consolidate conditionality/performance assessment around a single framework • If possible, create some fiscal space to manage some probably unavoidable aid volatility (reserve buffer, ability for short-term borrowing) without disrupting programs • Manage risks further through a use of different aid modalities (i.e., allow some disbursement to go on even in weak macroeconomic environments)

  6. What donors should do • Align review cycles with government planning cycles • Announce at least indicative financing decisions before the budget preparation begins • Make firm commitments of budget support before the beginning of the budget year • Disburse on time by carefully anticipating length of own processes when announcing timing of disbursements • Provide medium-term financing indications for MTEF and planning cycles

  7. What else donors could do • Harmonize disbursement conditionality • Revise conditions in line with the regular review cycle • Retain some flexibility in evaluating performance for disbursement decisions • Make graduated responses to weak performance

More Related