1 / 17

Some New Geometric Phase Effects in Mn 12 Variants

Some New Geometric Phase Effects in Mn 12 Variants. Jonathan Friedman Eduardo H. da Silva Neto Michael Foss-Feig Amherst College. Christos Lampropoulos George Christou UFL - Chemistry. Nurit Avraham Yuri Myaesoedov Hadas Shtrikman Eli Zeldov Weizmann Institute of Science.

emera
Download Presentation

Some New Geometric Phase Effects in Mn 12 Variants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Some New Geometric Phase Effects in Mn12 Variants Jonathan FriedmanEduardo H. da Silva Neto Michael Foss-FeigAmherst College Christos LampropoulosGeorge Christou UFL - Chemistry Nurit AvrahamYuri MyaesoedovHadas ShtrikmanEli ZeldovWeizmann Institute of Science Funding: NSF, Research Corporation and Amherst College Dean of Faculty

  2. Mn12 Ac

  3. The Effect of a Transverse Field The tunneling rate for a particular pair of resonant levels depends on the transverse field (H┴). H┴ increases the tunneling rate and reduces the barrier. Thermal Activation New Barrier -9 9 -10 10 D. A. Garanin and E. M. Chudnovsky, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11 102 (1997) J. R. Friedman, Phys. Rev. B, 57, 10291 (1998)

  4. Easy axis Z A Solid Angle W j H X B Hard axis Interference between Tunneling Paths in Fe8 • Theoretical Prediction: • A. Garg., EPL, 1993. W. Wernsdorfer and R. Sessoli, Science, 1999.

  5. Predicted Interference Effect for Mn12 Park and Garg, PRB, 2002

  6. Solvent Disorder in Mn12Ac Acetic acid of solvation Angle-selected relaxation rate. (del Barco, et al., PRL, 2003) Two positions of C deduced from X-ray diffraction → induced 2nd order anisotropy ESR spectrum as a function of azimuthal angle. (Edwards, et al., PRL, 2003) Cornia, et al., PRL, 2002

  7. A new SMM - Mn12 tBuAc Mn12-Ac Mn12-tBuAc • Mn12-tBuAc has less solvent disorder and weaker dipole interactions. • S. Hill et al., J. Appl. Phys. 97 (2005). • W. Wernsdorfer et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 057208 (2006). • A.-L. Barra et al., JACS, 129, 10754 (2007).

  8. Controlling the Relaxation Rate of Mn12-tBuAc with a Transverse Field Applied Magnetic Field position 1 position 2 θ Sample is rotated to position 1 T = 2.98(3) K HT = 4200 Oe HL=-500 Oe Large component of magnetic field along easy axis Lower well populated Sample is rotated to position 2 Small component of magnetic field along easy axis Large component of magnetic field transverse to easy axis Quasi-exponential decay in magnetization.

  9. Longitudinal Field Rate Distribution T = 3.21 (3) K HT = 4800 Oe ON Resonance Relaxation Rate OFF Resonance Relaxation Rate

  10. T = 3.21 (3) K Thermal Activation -9 9 -10 10

  11. Rates on and off resonance Off-resonance On-resonance Plateaus indicate dominant tunneling resonance • Plateaus (much flatter!) in the off-resonance relaxation. • Steps and plateaus occur at different fields on and off resonance

  12. Predicted Dependence of Relaxation Rate on Transverse Field On resonance Off resonance D. Garanin, arXiv:0805.0391

  13. Now Add Transverse Anisotropy (Fourth Order!) HT along hard axis. S. Hill et al., J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10M510(2005) A.-L. Barra et al., JACS, 129, 10754 (2007)

  14. Calculated Tunnel Splittings Park and Garg, PRB, 2002

  15. Full Data vs Simulations T = 3.21(3) K

  16. Predicted Pressure-Induced Interference Effect M. S. Foss-Feig and JRF, ArXiv:0809.2289

  17. Conclusions • Measured relaxation rate as a function of transverse field in highly symmetric Mn12-tBuAc. • Steps and plateaus in the relaxation rate as a function of transverse field both on and off resonance. • Off-resonance results appear to be a remnant of a geometric-phase interference effect. • Predicted new interference effect induced by uniaxial pressure.

More Related