PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION of Educational Programmes

1. PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATIONof Educational Programmes • EFFECTIVE MONITORING FRAMEWORK • EFFICIENT EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (EMIS)

2. DATA COLLECTING AGENCIES REGULAR: MHRD, SCHOOL OCCASIONAL: NCERT, HABITATION AD-HOC (Household): NSSO CENSUS NFHS NCAER

3. Limitations in the System • Administrative & Non-Administrative Problems • QUALITY & RELIABILITY • TIME-LAG • DATA-GAPS • UNTRAINED, UNQUALIFIED & INADEQUATE STAFF

4. DISE 2005 DISE 2006: HIGHLIGHTS 33 BACKGROUND • DPEP (1994) : MAJOR REFORMS NEEDED • GOI, UNICEF & NUEPA JOINED HANDS • NUEPA WAS ASSIGNED RESPONSIBILITY: DEVELOP COMPUTERISED EMIS, SCHOOL AS UNIT OF COLLECTION & DISTRICT UNIT OF DISSEMINATION • PROCESS INITIATED IN 1994-95 IN 7 DPEP STATES EXTENDED TO ENTIRE COUNTRY • SSA 2001 : COVERAGE WAS EXTENDED TO ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL : MIS UNITS: DISTRICTS/STATES • NO MORE DATA GAPS: EXTENSIVE DATA NOW AVAILABLE ON ALL COMPONENTS OF UEE • TIME-LAG IN DATA COMPLETELY ELIMINATED • TWO-WAY INFORMATION FLOW: SCHOOL REPORT CARDS • Government REVIEW COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION STATISTICS • CONTINUING PROCESS: A FEW CONCERNS ALSO, COVERAGE, CONSISTENCY, QUALITY, DISSEMINATION & UTILISATION OF DATA

5. SSA: DISE SOFTWARE REVISED IN 2001 • ENTIRE ELEMENTARY LEVEL • GRADES I TO VII/VIII IRRESPECTIVE OF TYPE OF SCHOOLS • INDEPENDENT • INTEGRATED • ALL RECOGNIZED INSTITUTIONS • FLEXIBILITY TO ADD STATE-SPECIFIC ADDITIONAL/SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES • REVISED DATABASE PROVIDES IMPROVED PLANNING, MANAGEMENT & MONITORING CAPABILITIES AT DIFFERENT LEVELS

6. DISE COVERAGE 30th Sept 2006: RECOGNISED SCHOOLS BLOCKS : 7,115 VILLAGES : 5,62,809

7. Flow of Information

8. MAJOR ACHIEVEMENTS • COULD ABLE TO ESTABLISH COMPUERSIED EMIS UNITS: DISTRICT & STATE LEVELS • COMPLETLEY ELIMINATED TIME-LAG IN DATA • NO MORE DATA GAPS • TIME-SERIES DATA: SCHOOL, CLUSTER, BLOCK, DISTRICT, STATE & NATIONAL LEVEL • DISTRICT/STATE/SCHOOL REPORT CARDS • ANALYTICAL REPORT • Elementary Education Plans are based on DISE Data • Random Sample Checking of Data by Independent Agency in each State • Researcher across the World are using DISE Data Next

9. DISE 2007-08(As on September 30, 2007) 34/35 States Submitted Data • Tamil Nadu (28.12.2007) • HP (31.12.2007) • PUNJAB (03.03.2008) • Gujarat (07.03.2008) • Mizoram (07.03.2008)

10. HOW IS DISE DIFFERENT? • WELL STRUCTURED FORMATS WITH PROVISION OF SUPPLEMENTARY VARIABLES • Thorough Checking of Filled-in Formats • NO SCOPE FOR MANUPULATION: FULLY COMPUTERISED • ERROR FREE, TIME TESTED USER FRIEDNLY SOFTWARE • ON LINE HELP • LOT OF IN-BUILT CONSISTENCY CHECKS • STRONG REPORT & GRAPHICS MODULE • INFORMATION FLOW: BOTH WAYS • DATA CAN BE EXTRACTED AT ANY LEVEL • NEXT

11. FOR THE FIRST TIME • EXTENSIVE DATA ON TEACHERS & PARA TEACHERS • MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS • INCENTIVES • EXAMINATION RESULTS • NUMBER OF DISABLED CHILDREN STUDYING

12. EXTENSIVE DATA • SCHOOL LOCATION, MANAGEMENT, RURAL-URBAN, ENROLMENT, BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENTS, INCENTIVES,MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTION, DISABILITIES, EXAMINATION RESULTS, STUDENT FLOW • Most of the EFA indicators can be generated

13. Dissemination • Print, Electronic, Internet • http://dise.in • http://schoolreportcards.in • http://educationforallinindia.com DISE Publications

14. Description

15. DISE Publications • Flash Statistics including EDI • Elementary Education in Rural India • Elementary Education in Urban India • District Report Cards: Volume I • District Report Cards: Volume II • Progress towards UEE: Analytical Report • Progress towards UEE: Analytical Tables • Where do we stand? State Report Cards • CD containing DISE Publications

23. BASIC DATA: 2001 KEY DATA: ELEMENTARY EDUCATION TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.) RATIO OF P. TO U.P. SCHOOLS/SECTIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ENROLMENT GRADE WISE REPETITION RATE GRADE WISE ENROLMENT OF SC/ST ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY TRANSITION RATE P. TO U.P. GPI PRIMARY GRADES EXAMINATION RESULTS INCENTIVES : NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES (PREVIOUS ACADEMIC YEAR) CLASSROOMS/OTHER ROOM NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE OF BUILDING POSITION OF TEACHERS BY EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION % TEACHERS TRAINED (IN-SERVICE) PARA TEACHERS % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM & SDGGRANT TEACHERS BY GENDER AND CASTE ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS TOTAL GROSSNESS AVERAGE NO. OF INSTRUCTIONAL DAYS AVG. NO. OF DAYS SPENT ON NON-TEACHING GER/NER (PRIMARY/U. PRIMARY) APPARENT SURVIVAL RATE RETENTION RATE % OF TLM & SDG GRANT UTILIZED STATE REPORT CARDS Back

24. Description

25. BASIC DATA, 2001 TOTAL SCHOOLS, RURAL SCHOOLS, TOTAL ENROLMENT, RURAL ENROLMENT, TEACHERS (GOVT. /PVT.) PERFORMANCE INDICATORS BY SCHOOL CATEGORY ENROLMENT (TIME SERIES) GRADE WISE GER/NER ENROLMENT OF SC/ST INDICATORS BY SCHOOL CATEGORY FLOW RATES (REPETITION RATE, DROP OUT RATE, PROMOTION RATE) ENROLMENT OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY TRANSITION RATE COMPLETION RATE CLASSROOMS: AVERAGE NO. OF SCHOOLS BY TYPE OF BUILDING POSITION OF TEACHERS BY EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATION EXAMINATION RESULTS PARA TEACHERS GENDER AND CASTE DISTRIBUTION OF TEACHERS ENROLMENT BY MEDIUM OF INSTRUCTIONS % OF TOTAL GROSSNESS % SCHOOLS RECEIVED TLM & SDG GRANT INCENTIVES: NUMBER OF BENEFICIARIES: BY TYPE OF INCENTIVES DISTRICT REPORT CARDS Continue

26. A FEW AREAS of CONCERN • AD-HOC ARRANGMENT FOR DISE ACTIVITIES: Project Mode, Multiple Sources, Frequent Changes, Official Stat • OBTAINING DATA FROM ALL RECONGNISED PRIVATE SCHOOLS NOT a SIMPLE TASK • UNRECOGNISED SCHOOLS • LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY/Low Priority • LACK OF DISSEMINATION POLICY • DATA UTILIZATION STILL POOR • School IDs

27. Challenges Ahead • HIGH EXPECTATIONS • Obtaining Data from all DISTRICTS/STATES • BLOCK REPORT CARDS • FURTHER IMPROVING QUALITY OF DATA • CREATING DEMAND FOR DISE DATA • DATA SHOULD REACH TO ALL DATA USERS AT ALL LEVELS • EXTEND ITS SCOPE TO SECONDARY EDUCATION • HIGHER EDUCATION MIS

28. Please log on to http://www.schoolreportcards.in