1 / 50

Judith Berner , NCAR

Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate: stochastic versa multi-physics representations. Judith Berner , NCAR. Key Points. There is model error in weather and climate models from the need to parameterize subgrid-scale fluctuations

emery
Download Presentation

Judith Berner , NCAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Representing model uncertainty in weather and climate: stochastic versa multi-physics representations Judith Berner, NCAR

  2. Key Points • There is model error in weather and climate models • from the need to parameterize subgrid-scale fluctuations • This model error leads to overconfident uncertainty estimates and possibly model bias • We need a model error representation • Hierarchy of simulations where statistical output from one level is used to inform the next (e.g., stochastic kinetic energy backscatter) • Reliability of ensemble systems with stochastic parameterizations start to become comparable to that of ensembles systems with multi-physics

  3. “Domino Parameterization strategy” • Higher-resolution model inform output of lower-resolution model • Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme provides such a framework • … But there are others, e.g. Cloud-resolving convective parameterization or super-parameterization

  4. Multiple scales of motion 1mm 10 m 100 m 1 km 10 km 100 km 1000 km 10000 km Micro- physics Extratropical Cyclones Turbulence Cumulus clouds Cumulonimbus clouds Mesoscale Convective systems Planetary waves Large Eddy Simulation (LES) Model Cloud System Resolving Model (CSRM) Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) Model Global Climate Model

  5. The spectral gap … (Stull)

  6. Atmospheric Scientists Nastrom and Gage, 1985

  7. .... The link between climate forcing and climate impact involves processes acting on different timescales …

  8. NPW model Climate model Cloud resolving model Cloud resolving model Large Eddy simulation Resolved microphysics Attempt to capture Multi-scale nature of atmospheric motion

  9. Hierarchical Parameterization Strategy NPW model Climate model Cloud resolving model Large Eddy simulation Resolved microphysics Related: Grabowski 1999, Shutts and Palmer, 2007

  10. Validity of spectral gap …

  11. The spectral gap … Mathematicians Atmospheric Scientists

  12. The spectral gap … M pathematicians Atmospheric Scientists

  13. Spectral gap not necessary for stochastic parameterizations

  14. Kinetic energy spectra in 500hPa Rotational part Rotational part Kinetic energy spectrum is closer to that of T799 analysis !

  15. Limited vs unlimited predictability Rotunno and Snyder, 2008 Lorenz 1969; see also: Tribbia and Baumhefner, 2004

  16. Stochastic parameterizations have the potential to reduce model error Potential • Stochastic parameterizations can change the mean and variance of a PDF • Impacts variability of model (e.g. internal variability of the atmosphere) • Impacts systematic error (e.g. blocking, precipitation error) Weak noise Strong noise PDF Unimodal Multi-modal

  17. Outline • Parameterizations in numerical weather prediction models and climate models • A stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme • Impact on synoptic probabilistic weather forecasting (short/medium-range) • Impact on systematic model error (seasonal to climatic time-scales) Acknowledgements Aime Fournier, So-young Ha, Josh Hacker, Thomas Jung, Tim Palmer, Paco Doblas-Reyes, Glenn Shutts, Chris Snyder, Antje Weisheimer

  18. Sensitivity to initial perturbations

  19. Representing initial state uncertainty by an ensemble of states RMS error • Represent initial uncertainty by ensemble of states • Flow-dependence: • Predictable states should have small ensemble spread • Unpredictable states should have large ensemble spread • Ensemble spread should grow like RMS error • True atmospheric state should be indistinguishable from ensemble system spread ensemble mean analysis

  20. Underdispersion of the ensemble system Systems • The RMS error grows faster than the spread • Ensemble isunderdispersive • Ensemble forecast is overconfident -------spread around ensemble mean RMS error of ensemble mean • Underdispersion is a form of model error • Forecast error = initial error + model error + boundary error Buizza et al., 2004

  21. Manifestations of model error In medium-range: • Underdispersion of ensemble system (Overconfidence) • Can “extreme” weather events be captured? On seasonal to climatic scales: • Systematic Biases • Not enough internal variability • To which degree do e.g. climate sensitivity depend on a correct estimate of internal variability? • Shortcomings in representation of physical processes: • Underestimation of the frequency of blocking • Tropical variability, e.g. MJO, wave propagation

  22. Representing model error in ensemble systems • The multi-parameterization approach: each ensemble member uses a different set of parameterizations (e.g. for cumulus convection, planetary boundary layer, microphysics, short-wave/long-wave radiation, land use, land surface) • The multi-parameter approach: each ensemble member uses the control pysics, but the parameters are varied from one ensemble member to the next • Stochastic parameterizations: each ensemble member is perturbed by a stochastic forcing term that represents the statistical fluctuations in the subgrid-scale fluxes (stochastic diabatic tendencies) as well as altogether unrepresented interactions between the resolved an unresolved scale (stochastic kinetic energy backscatter)

  23. Using conventional parameterizations Stochastic parameterizations (Buizza et al, 1999, Lin and Neelin, 2000) Multi-parameterization approaches (Houtekamer, 1996, Berner et al. 2010) Multi-parameter approaches (e.g. Murphy et al,, 2004; Stainforth et al, 2004) Multi-models (e.g. DEMETER, ENSEMBLES, TIGGE, Krishnamurti et. al 1999) Outside conventional parameterizations Cloud-resolving convective parameterization (CRCP) or super-parameterization (Grabowski and Smolarkiewicz 1999, Khairoutdinov and Randall 2001) Nonlocal parameterizations, e.g., cellular automata pattern generator (Palmer, 1997, 2001) Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter in NWP (Shutts 2005, Berner et al. 2008,2009,…) Recent attempts at remedying model error in NWP

  24. Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter LES Mason and Thompon, 1992, Weinbrecht and Mason, 2008 Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter in simplified models Frederiksen and Keupert 2004 Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter in NWP IFS ensemble system, ECMWF: Shutts and Palmer 2003, Shutts 2005, Berner et al. 2009a,b, Steinheimer MOGREPS, MetOffice Bowler et al 2008, 2009; Tennant et al 2010 Canadian Ensemble System Li et al 2008, Charron et al. 2010 AFWA mesoscale ensemble system, NCAR Berner et al. 2010 Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter schemes

  25. Forcing streamfunction spectra by coarse-graining CRMs from Glenn Shutts

  26. “Domino Parameterization strategy” • Higher-resolution model inform output of lower-resolution model • Stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme provides such a framework • … But there are others, e.g. Cloud-resolving convective parameterization or super-parameterization

  27. Model error in weather forecasting and climate models A stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme (SPBS) Impact of SPBS on probabilistic weather forecasting (medium-range) -> Martin’s talk Impact of SPBS on systematic model error Impact in a mesoscale model and comparison to a multi-physics scheme

  28. Forecast error growth • For perfect ensemble system: • the true atmospheric state should be indistinguishable from a perturbed ensemble member • forecast error and model uncertainty (=spread) should be the same • Since IPs are reduced, forecast error is reduced for small forecast times • More kinetic energy in small scales

  29. Model error in weather forecasting and climate models A stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme: SPectral Backscatter Scheme Impact of SPBS on probabilistic weather forecasting (medium-range) Impact of SPBS on systematic model error Impact in a mesoscale model and comparison to a multi-physics scheme

  30. Experimental Setup for Seasonal Runs “Seasonal runs: Atmosphere only” • Atmosphere only, observed SSTs • 40 start dates between 1962 – 2001 (Nov 1) • 5-month integrations • One set of integrations with stochastic backscatter, one without • Model runs are compared to ERA40 reanalysis (“truth”)

  31. Reduction of systematic error of z500 over North Pacific and North Atlantic No StochasticBackscatter Stochastic Backscatter

  32. Increase in occurrence of Atlantic and Pacific blocking ERA40 + confidence interval Stochastic Backscatter No StochasticBackscatter

  33. Wavenumber-Frequency SpectrumSymmetric part, background removed (after Wheeler and Kiladis, 1999) Observations (NOAA) No Stochastic Backscatter

  34. Improvement in Wavenumber-Frequency Spectrum Observations (NOAA) Stochastic Backscatter • Backscatter scheme reduces erroneous westward propagating modes

  35. Model error in weather forecasting and climate models A stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme: SPectral Backscatter Scheme Impact of SPBS on probabilistic weather forecasting (medium-range) Impact of SPBS on systematic model error Impact in a mesoscale model and comparison to a multi-physics scheme

  36. Experiment setup • Ensemble A/B: 10 member ensemble with and without SPBS • Ensemble C: 10 member multi-physics suite • Weather Research and Forecast Model • 30 cases between Nov 2008 and Feb 2009 • 40km horizontal resolution and 40 vertical levels • Limited area model: Continuous United States (CONUS) • Started from GFS initial condition (downscaled from NCEPs Global Forecast System)

  37. Multiple Physics packages

  38. WRF short-range ensemble: 60h-forecast for Oct 13, 2006: SLP and surface wind • Control Physics Ensemble

  39. WRF short-range ensemble: 60h-forecast for Oct 13, 2006: SLP and surface wind • Stochastic Backscatter Ensemble

  40. Spread-Error Relationship Control Backscatter Multi-Physics PHYS_STOCH

  41. Brier Score, U Control Backscatter Multi-Physics PHYS_STOCH

  42. Scatterplots of verification scores • Both, Stochastic backscatter and Multi-physics are better than control • Stochastic backscatter is better than Multi-physics is better • Their combination is even better

  43. Multiple Physics packages

  44. Brier Score Control Multi-Physics Backscatter

  45. Spread-Error Relationship Control Backscatter Multi-Physics PHYS_STOCH

  46. Seasonal Predication Uncalibrated Calibrated Stochastic Ensemble Multi-model Curtosy: TimPalmer

  47. Summary and conclusion • Stochastic parameterization have the potential to reduce model error by changing the mean state and internal variability. • It was shown that the new stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme (SPBS) produced a more skilful ensemble and reduced certain aspects of systematic model error • Increases predictability across the scales (from mesoscale over synoptic scale to climatic scales) • Stochastic Backscatter outperforms Multi-physics Ens. • Stochastic backscatter scheme provides a framework for hierarchical parameterization strategy, where stochastic parameterization for the lower resolution model is informed by higher resolution model

  48. Future Work • Understand the nature of model error better • Inform more parameters from coarse-grained high-resolution output • Impact on climate sensitivity • Consequences for error growth and predictability

  49. Challenges • How can we incorporate the “structural uncertainty” estimated by multi-models into stochastic parameterizations?

  50. Bibliography • Berner, J., 2005: Linking Nonlinearity and non-Gaussianity by the Fokker-Planck equation and the associated nonlinear stochastic model, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, pp. 2098-2117 • Shutts, G. J., 2005: A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for usein ensemble prediction systems. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 612,3079-3102 • Berner, J., F. J. Doblas-Reyes, T. N. Palmer, G. Shutts, and A. Weisheimer, 2008: Impact of a quasi-stochastic cellular automaton backscatter scheme on the systematic error and seasonal predicition skill of a global climate model, Phil. Trans. R. Soc A, 366, pp. 2561-2579, DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0031. • Berner J., G. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, and T.N. Palmer, 2009: A Spectral Stochastic Kinetic Energy Backscatter Scheme and its Impact on Flow-dependent Pre- dictability in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, J. Atmos. Sci.,66,pp.603-626 • T.N. Palmer, F.J. Doblas-Reyes, A. Weisheimer, G.J. Shutts, J. Berner, J.M. Murphy, 2008: Towards the Probabilistic Earth-System Model, J.Clim., in preparation

More Related