430 likes | 573 Views
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit. Source: National Transit Database. Source: National Transit Database. Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth. Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth
E N D
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth 3. Helps cities compete for jobs and talent
Any other reasons? • Close-in housing more expensive • Educated people more likely to work downtown Do we really want to subsidize transit for high-income people?
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth 3. Helps cities compete for jobs and talent 4. Reduces congestion & air pollution
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth 3. Helps cities compete for jobs and talent 4. Reduces congestion & air pollution 5. Is more efficient
Plans Assume More Spending 1. Makes better transit 2. Supports urban growth 3. Helps cities compete for jobs and talent 4. Reduces congestion & air pollution 5. Is more efficient 6. Helps urban poor
Alternative Plan 1. No rail transit 2. No dedicated bus lanes 3. Contract out transit 4. Allow private transit 5. Allow communities outside Marion County to have transit to Indianapolis 6. Cost-effectively fix congestion
For more information: Web sites: cato.org ti.org americandreamcoalition.org e-mail: rot@cato.org