380 likes | 391 Views
This module introduces the Model for Improvement and Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge, with a focus on adolescent immunization. Learn steps, problem components, and tools for a thoughtful QI approach. Discover methods to clarify knowledge theory and psychological aspects of problems.
E N D
Academic Pediatric AssociationQUALITY IMPROVEMENT TRAINING: Module #1 Overview: The Model for Improvement and Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge This work is supported by a grant from The Centers for Disease Control & Prevention.
National Partnership for Adolescent ImmunizationPI: Peter SzilagyiCoordinators: Christina Albertin, Nui Dhepyasuwan • Ed Marcuse (communication expert) • Cindy Rand • Jan Schriefer (QI expert) • Stanley Schaffer • Janet Serwint • William Stratbucker • Donna D'Alessandro • William Atkinson • Paul Darden • Sharon Humiston (moderator) • Keith Mann (QI expert) FACULTY & CONSULTANTS
This is part of the APA series on Quality Improvement. The examples focus on adolescent immunization, but the principles are widely applicable. The series includes: • Overview: The Model for Improvement and Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge • Improvement cycles and the psychology of change • Initiating a QI project • More tools to better understand the system • How will we know that a change is an improvement? An introduction to QI measurement • Changes we can make that will result in improvement
Module 1 Objectives • Describe briefly 3 steps you need to take before starting the actual remedial QI process. These correspond to the modeling processes of Juran’s Diagnostic Journey. • Describe briefly the 4 inter-related components of a problem that Dr. Deming argued needed to be understood as part of the conceptual modeling of a problem. • Describe briefly 2 aspects of the actual remedial QI process. These correspond to Juran’s Remedial Journey, or the Model for Improvement. • Outline how research is different than QI
Importance of a Thoughtful QI ApproachIf you want to improve your clinical setting, what are your options? • Keep doing what you are doing & hope for different results (the definition of insanity) • Just do something new & hope for the best • Unexpected consequences? • Sustainability? • Isn’t this approach the root of a lot of our cynicism? • A thoughtful QI approach
1. Three steps you need to take before starting the actual remedial QI process
Don’t “Just Do It” Before you start making changes, key steps include: • Development of a (general) mission statement • Conceptual modeling of the problem • Prioritization of possible changes
1) Development of a general mission statement • What are you trying to accomplish – in a general way (e.g., “We want to increase our adolescent immunization rates.”) • At this phase, you probably do not know the specifics (e.g., For which vaccines are your rates low? Are they only low for a subset of patients?) Development of a more specific Aim Statement is covered in Module 3
2) Conceptual modeling of the problem A. Formal methods – conceptual flow diagrams, decision flow charts B. Informal methods – cause & effect diagrams, 5 whys These tools will be introduced in Module 4.
3) Prioritization of possible changes (Tools to help you with this are in Module 6 .)
QUESTION #1 Which of the following is NOT a step you need to take before starting the actual remedial QI process? • Model the problem • Spread the change to affiliated clinical sites • Write a general mission statement • Choose a change to test
QUESTION #1 Which of the following is NOT a step you need to take before starting the actual remedial QI process? • Model the problem • Spread the intervention to affiliated clinical sites (This step may come after an intervention has been shown to be successful.) • Write a mission statement • Choose a change to test
2. Fourinter-related components of a problem Dr. Deming argued these needed to be understood as part of the conceptual modeling of a problem .
If you do not know how to ask the right question, you discover nothing. W.E. Deming
Questions that help clarify the theory of knowledge & psychological aspects of the problem: • What are the potential beliefs about HPV vaccine clinic held by those within the system? • How could those beliefs impact the success of the QI project • What are barriers to change within the clinic (people / processes)? That is, what are the attitudes to change itself that make change harder.
Questions that help clarify the theory of knowledge & psychological aspects of the problem (continued): • How could the barriers be overcome? • What could we do to motivate the healthcare workers?It is key to recognize that different things motivate different people. • What additional information does this group need and how would you gather that information?
Variation:How do the outcomes changefrom time to time? Common cause variation • Due to factors inherent in the system (the noise in the system) • Accounts for most of the variation • Example: Some days more patients show up so everyone is pressured and shots during acute visits do not happen
Variation (continued) Special cause variation • Due to unexpected factors • Accounts for little of the variation • Example: On March 3rd, someone accidentally locked the room that had the vaccine refrigerator so on that day no one got vaccinated
Why do we care about differentiating these causes of variation? • Design: Usually, we want our QI change to address problems inherent to the system, not just blips • Analysis of outcomes: After we put our change in place, when we are analyzing the outcome we want to be sure that improvement is part of the (new) system, not just a blip
QUESTION #2At the QI team’s first meeting, team members report hearing the opinions (shown on the next page) about the office’s low adolescent immunization rates. Which of the 4 aspects of Dr. Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge corresponds to the team members’ concern? (Use each of the 4 only once.)
Your choices are Appreciation for the system, understanding variation, theory of knowledge, & psychology
Your choices are Appreciation for the system, understanding variation, theory of knowledge, & psychology
Model for Improvement (aka Remedial Journey) • Answering Nolan’s 3 fundamental questions for improvement • Running rapid cycle improvement trials
Nolan’s 3 Fundamental Questions for Improvement • What are we trying to accomplish? Focused aim statement • How will we know that a change is an improvement? Measurement system – balanced measures, run charts • What changes could we make that might result in improvement? List of change hypotheses
Rapid Cycle Improvement Trials (aka PDSA Cycles) Plan a change Do it in a small test Study the results Quantitative data (run charts) Qualitative data (front-line worker experience) Act Modify or replace the change hypothesis OR Accept and deploy results
Research or QI? QI and research?
Institutional Review • Each organization has different policies on having their Institutional Review Board (IRB) decide what is research and what is a QI project. • Be sure to work with your IRB before beginning your project.
Summary • Before starting the actual remedial QI process develop a mission statement, model the problem, and prioritize possible changes. • 4 inter-related components of a problem you need to understood include the system, variation, knowledge and psychology. • The Model for Improvement includes answering 3 essential questions and then doing PDSA cycles iteratively. • Research is different than QI; make sure you comply with the policies of your IRB.
The End of Module #1