1 / 16

Property Rights and The Commons

Property Rights and The Commons. The political ecology of conservation in the American West. Tragedy of the Commons. A Paper Written by ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968 States that people acting in a rational way will try to maximize their gain. This leads to misuse of resources

emma
Download Presentation

Property Rights and The Commons

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Property Rights and The Commons The political ecology of conservation in the American West

  2. Tragedy of the Commons • A Paper Written by ecologist Garrett Hardin in 1968 • States that people acting in a rational way will try to maximize their gain. This leads to misuse of resources that are shared by all. Garrett Hardin

  3. What does this mean? • The Example Hardin used: Cattle grazers on a shared field. • Each has one cow, the field can support this number • Each farmer wants to get more profit and feels that if they add one cow the field will still be able to support the grazing. • The problem: All the farmers think like this, and soon there are double the number of cattle on the field, and it is overgrazed. Thus, the shared field is ruined because there was no agreement between the grazers.

  4. Applications • Aside from cattle grazing, this social phenomena has implications in: • Shared forest use • Fishery use • C02 pollution (the atmosphere is a shared resource) • Pollution of streams and lakes • Etc…

  5. What to do about the tragedy? • Privatize the resource • Government ownership and regulation • Community ownership and regulation

  6. The problems with federal land ownership.

  7. 1.) Differing ideas of nature. • These different ideas of nature and what resources should/ should not be used for are the root of many conflicts about natural resources. • The study of these different ideas, and how they impact political decisions is called political ecology

  8. Two (of many) differing views: • Nature as a livelihood: People who often work and live in rural areas in jobs that require resource extraction. • Nature as a getaway:Often wealthier people who live in urban environments and go to nature to get away from the city.

  9. 2.) Differing ideas of Government • Jeffersonian: Government should have a limited role in society. Big government is inherently corrupt. Advocate for states rights. • Hamiltonian: Government should have a strong central authority, those who are educated should be in charge. Belief in expert regulators.

  10. A Case Study in the West

  11. A conflict in Northern California • A new state park that would cover 2% of the county land. Including mountains and valleys. It blocks off ranchers access to a stream, but it also allows enough habitat for an endangered species of bird to live.

  12. The Ranchers • Have had family homesteads in this area since the 1880’s • Livelihood involves using natural resources, such as water and land, to raise cattle • Do not have a lot of money • See City dwellers as not doing real work • On a more fundamental level, See nature as something to be USED responsibly.

  13. The Wealthy City Dwellers • Feel they have earned the opportunity to live in and experience the beautiful countryside • Coming to the area with increasing frequency (changing the population make up) • See Nature in a more romantic light – as something to be preserved for its beauty

  14. County Board Elections • The City Dwellers have someone with their interests in mind run for office • The Ranchers have someone with their interests in mind run for office • Split the class in two, each side represents either the city dwellers (newly moved to this area) or the ranchers. • Each group picks a representative • Have a debate – who should win the election, why? • What should be done about making a state park in the county?

  15. What were the results? • Was compromise made? Or did the land rights go all to one group? • In reality often one group (the one with more money behind them) gets entire land rights and makes the other group very mad. • This resulted on a national level in the Sagebrush Rebellion in the 1980’s. This was a group of well organized ranchers in the west who were vehemently opposed to government regulation (and ownership of land) and helped get Reagan into office.

More Related