160 likes | 172 Views
This topic explores Orthodox and Heterodox trade theories, including Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Heckscher and Ohlin, and Stolper and Samuelson. It focuses on the classical approach, using Smith's model to analyze the welfare gains through specialization based on absolute cost advantages.
E N D
Principles of International Economics Prof. Dr. Hans H. Bass, Bremen University of Applied Sciences, International Degree Programme in Economics Summer Term 2010
Principles of International Economics Topic 3: Analyzing the Consequences of International Trade
Agenda International Economics • Orthodox Trade Theories Adam Smith David Ricardo Heckscher and Ohlin Stolper and Samuelson • Heterodox Trade Theories
Principles of International Economics Topic 3.1: Orthodox Trade Theories 3.1.1 The Classics: Smith
Welfare gains by specialization according to absolute cost advantages: the model 3.1.1 Smith • two countries (North, South) • natural advantages (sun, rain) • two commodities (wool, wheat) • one factor: labor
A numeric example 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example: Maximal amount of production, if L = 1,000 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example: Maximal amount of production in autarky if LN, S = 4,000 3.1.1 Smith
A numeric example: Maximal amount of production in complete specialization if LN, S = 4,000 3.1.1 Smith
The assumptions revisited 3.1.1 Smith • climatic and technical conditions exactly opposite to each other absolute cost advantage • no technology transfer • labor theory of value • constant marginal costs, constant economies of scale • external trade is a state monopoly • no transport costs • no time for adjustment • factors of production (labor) internally completely mobile, externally completely immobile
In his own words: 3.1.1 Smith
In his own words: 3.1.1 Smith “It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy. The taylor does not attempt to make his own shoes, but buys them of the shoemaker. The shoemaker does not attempt to make his own clothes, but employs a taylor. What is prudence in the conduct of every private family can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom. If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage.”