1 / 42

Models of Inservice Training

Models of Inservice Training. Claire Bradin Siskin University of Pittsburgh. It is often lamented that teachers aren't using CALL to best advantage or that they aren't using CALL at all. ("faculty," "instructors," "professors," etc.).

enewman
Download Presentation

Models of Inservice Training

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Models of Inservice Training Claire Bradin SiskinUniversity of Pittsburgh

  2. It is often lamented that teachers aren't using CALL to best advantage or that they aren't using CALL at all. • ("faculty," "instructors," "professors," etc.)

  3. "Teachers can't/won't use CALL because they don't have enough training."

  4. Inservice training: • "professional development" • "staff development" • "personal development opportunities" • "faculty orientation"

  5. "teaching teachers after they have been hired"

  6. I have discovered: • There are very few formal, systematic descriptions of CALL inservice training for CALL. • There are very few guidelines.

  7. Overview: • General description • Observations on best practices

  8. Types: • workshops • self-paced tutorials: handouts, videotapes, CD-ROMs, Web

  9. Content: Training in CALL is sometimes perceived as just training on how to use computers.Other types of training are also needed.

  10. Content: Pedagogy; use of CALL CALL "literacy" General computer literacy

  11. Comment from an ESL instructor: "I know what to do with the computer. I know how to make the software work. But I don't know what to do with the students."

  12. Basic characteristic of CALL workshops: • There is a very wide range of computer literacy and knowledge of CALL among the participants.

  13. Workshops: • from 10 minutes – 2 weeks • typically 1-2 hours a session

  14. Inservice training: • sometimes voluntary • sometimes required by law(or by administrators) • sometimes accompanied by credit

  15. Observations on best practices (since 1984…)

  16. In ideal world, inservice training ... • shouldn't be a one-shot deal • should be ongoing • should be cyclical • should be practical

  17. What do teachers want? • Many teachers don’t want “training.” • They want results. • They want information on demand. • They want specific solutions to specific problems on an as-needed basis. • They want just what they have determined to be useful, just when they want it.

  18. Find out what teachers really want to know, and start from there.

  19. Choosing topics: • Do a needs assessment; survey • Solicit suggestions via email • Ask the curriculum supervisors for suggestions • Each year: inventory of computer skills for new instructors • The more flexible, the better

  20. Increase teachers' comfort level by addressing personal needs: • using a spreadsheet • screen shots • send attachments to email • scan pictures and text

  21. A big paradox: In-service training may be counter-productive if teachers are required to attend.

  22. If they aren’t required to attend, some teachers may never acquire the desired skills.

  23. In some cases, teachers can be paid to attend CALL workshops. • (This may sweeten the situation.)

  24. In advance: • Describe what computer skills are needed • in the session description.

  25. Don’t do all the workshops yourself. Outsiders have a special aura. • other teachers • other units on campus • experts from nearby campuses • graduate students • visitors

  26. Allow for individual learning styles: • handouts • self-paced tutorials: videotapes, CD-ROMs, Web

  27. Allow for individual learning styles: large groupspairs or small groupsobserving while others work

  28. Allow for differences in age and status.

  29. Some teachers respond better to one-on-one sessions in a private place.

  30. Training needs to be more than just "hands-on." • Background information • Demonstrations • Time to discuss and reflect

  31. Hands-on workshops: Don’t assume that each participant always needs his/her own computer.

  32. In advance: Be sure that all computers are configured correctly for the activity.

  33. Have tech support available.

  34. For hands-on activities: Provide a high ratio of assistants to participants.

  35. Recommended:1 “helper” per 5 participants • 10 participants: 1 presenter + 1 assistant • 15 participants: 1 presenter + 2 assistants • 20 participants: 1 presenter + 3 assistants, etc.

  36. During the workshop: • Have infinite patience. • Allow participants to work at their own pace.

  37. Realize that not everyone easily associates one's own computer screen with what is projected.

  38. Software/website evaluation activities need to be broken down into small chunks.

  39. Provide detailed handouts. Use large screen shots that are easy to read.

  40. People lose handouts.Put them online.

  41. For workshops longer than an hour, • Allow for breaks • Serve refreshments if you can • Provide opportunities for socializing and networking.

  42. Afterwards: • Pay attention to workshop evaluations. • Use constructive comments.

More Related