240 likes | 379 Views
Bonding and bridging. Social media as a platform for discussions and news in a multicultural society. Motivation. Hypothesis: Dialogue between migrants groups and journalists can improve the quality of intercultural journalism. Social media offer the possibility for dialogue.
E N D
Bonding and bridging Social media as a platform fordiscussionsandnews in a multicultural society
Motivation • Hypothesis: • Dialogue between migrants groups and journalists can improve the quality of intercultural journalism. • Social media offer the possibility for dialogue
Initiative • Initiative by Mira Media, as a result of discussions in earlier meetings • Developed in cooperation with –and payed by) the Dutch Press fund
Main question • What can be the role (or task) of ethinc portalsite, webfora and social media in connecting ethnic groups and (mainstream) journalists?
Method • Desktopresearch • Monitoring of the use of social media (during 4 months) • Survey with stakeholders • NGO’s, editors portalsites, journalists, Interviews with social media experts • Interviews with (social)medioa experts
Which media wereinmvolved • Important: the possibilty to interact • Discussion forums • Portals that encourage reactions and interaction • Twitter • Facebook • (Hyves)
Discussion forums • Popularwithyoungpeople; • MainlyMoroccan • Mostly girls • It’s rather safe (anonymous/fake names) • It’s aboutidentity • Lots of religiousdiscussions • Notsomuchaboutnews, onl;ywhenit’snews in the neighbourhoof, or directlyinfluencingpeople • Oneexception: Waterkant: middleage, elderlySurinamese
News consumption • Ethnic groups make more use of news sources than originally Dutch, but often in a different way • News nearby (local/regional; instead of national) • News from countries of origin • Use of satelite, internet and apps (insteaqd of print)
Preferred media • Satelite television and and papers in Turkish/from Turkey (Turks) • Dutch media and Al Jazeera (Marokkanen) • Online broadcasts from Suriname or the Antilles (Surinamers/Antillianen) • Ethnic media in the Netherlands (Radio Mart, Salto) Surinamers en Antillianen
Content Few differencesbetween mainstream media anddiscussion forums • Mainstream media take the lead, discussion forums andethnic media follow • But large differences in viewpontsandvisions.
Monitoring • Quickscan on initiatial situation on Morocccan, Turkish, Polish, Afghan and Surinamese social media and discussion forums • Monitoring during 4 months • which items got most reactions • How many reactions each item got • How many views each item had • What was the source of the item.
Reactions(Marokko.nl) Religion, identity, discrimination, entertainment Mostly foreign sources Lots of reactions
Reactions on Hababam (Turkish) Orientated on Turkey Mostly in Turkish Sources from Turkey
Reactions Waterkant (Surinamese) Very different topics Short essays insteda of reactions Mostly middle age or elderly respondents
ReactionsAfghan Sensational or funny
Reactions Wereldjournalisten Politicalandethnic controverse Serioustone of voice Moderationseldomnecessary Few reactions, retweetsincreasing
Editors of websites, NGO’s, journalists • Use of social media by ethnic groups increases, especialy twitter and facebook • ‘Lurking’: reading, not posting, not making use of social media in a strategical way. • Republiek Allochtonië, Maroc.nl, Marokko.nl, Wereldjournalisten • Journalists: Lack of knowledge on or lack of confidence on ethnic (social) media
Conclusions • Discussions tendto change from portals tosocial media • This make discussions more superficial • Social media usedbyethnicgroups show the differences in viewpoints/perspectivesandvisions. • Socialmedia usedbyethnicgroupsnotoftenprovide ‘new’ news • The opportunities of social media aren’tfullyutilizedby migrant organizations, mostlybecausetheyhaven’t a strategyusingthem • The opportunities of social media aren’tfullyutilizedbyjournalists, becausetheydon’tknowthem, or don’t trust them