650 likes | 1.27k Views
2. Mission / Vision for HSE. Shared MissionMaking Shell the best EP Company in the world a
E N D
1. One HSE MS for EP(integrated within an EP-MS) 25 HSE Global Processes
1 HSE elements of the EP MS
2
2. 2 Mission / Vision for HSE
3. 3 Why are they important My 3 year + aspiration for HSE in Shell EP Shell EP
No more “surprise” significant incidents
Recognised Shell E&P signature in HSE management across operations
Standardised in key risk area’s
Collaboration X-regions, pull for standardisation
Risk management truly balanced and practised
ALARP practised and used by seniors leaders
Behaviours
Pro-active culture throughout
Individual staff understand and accepts role
Interventions are natural
Staff with HSE critical roles are assessed and assured competent
HSE-MS fully integrated in the Common MS including EPBM processes
Policy states that staff has “duty to intervene” rather then a “right to stop” an activity
HSE is used as the lever for change
HSE
Competent, experienced and respected cadre of professionals
Strong positive influence in business
Crew change has commenced, due regard for long term diversity
Portfolio of global and regional/local HSE issues is transparent and actively worked
Supporting modern portfolio of IT processes
HSE defined as risk area and business process in EPBM
4. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 4 HSE Global Processes
5. 5 EP Global HSE standards and procedures (Integrated in the EP MS)
6. 6 Managing the transition
7. 7 EP2005-0000 (update of EP95-0000)
8. 8 EP2005-0000 (update of EP95-0000)
9. 9 EP2005-0000 (update of EP95-0000)
10. 10 25 HSE Global Processes http://sww.siep.shell.com/hse/hse_ms/process.htm
11. 11
12. 12
13. 13 Behaviour HSE
14. 14 Bringing the HSE-MS to Life and Beyond - Personal Responsibility We understand and accept what should be done and know what is expected of us.
be "crystal clear" in our HSE expectations
know exactly what you expect of others and what others expect of you
how to deliver on those commitments
have the skills and competence to do it.
Attributes
CMS identifies risks and controls
Roles made crystal clear for everybody
Create passion through 1 to 1 discussion of
Roles and responsibilities
“Top Seven” priorities identified
People accept roles and want to be held accountable through personally meaningful performance contracts that drive new behaviours
15. 15 Bringing the HSE-MS to Life and Beyond - Clarity of Individual Consequences We understand and accept that there is a fair system for reward and discipline.
Staff appraisal systems reflect the aspired HSE goals, rewarding those who deliver but with the appropriate mechanisms in place when coaching is needed.
Unsafe acts at all levels must be dealt with immediately in a just, fair and transparent way.
16. 16 Bringing the HSE-MS to Life and Beyond – Hearts and Minds We work safely because we are intrinsically motivated to do the right things naturally, not just because we are told
Supported by a set of high quality tools which are available to Shell companies in the form of controlled packages of brochures, slide presentations, instructions etc.
Understanding your culture
Managing Rule Breaking
Risk Assessment Matrix
Making Change Last
Improving Supervision
Seeing – as others see you
Driving Safely
Working Safely
Achieving situation awareness- The Rule of Three
17. 17
18. 18
19. 19
20. 20 HSE Competence Workgroup proposal
Group definitions for 28 HSE Competence elements
Definition 2 categories of HSE critical roles
need to address HSE competence of senior leaders
Generic HSE Competence profiles for HSE Critical roles
HSE Competence profiles for HSE Advisory roles
HSE Competence Assessment and Assurance process
Subsequent action
Update Group HSE-MS
Issue new Yellow Guide with HSE Competence elements and assessment / assurance process
HSE Council endorsement and CMD report out
Business implementation 2004 - 2005
Outstanding action
Supporting self learning modules to support the above
Use base packages Chemical and modify over next 3 month
General linkage HSE learning and development to above
Planned for 2004 / 2005 HSE Competence Assurance for HSE critical roles: Summary Proposal
21. 21 Non-HSE competence of staff with HSE Critical roles
Overall competence not limited to HSE competence, own professional discipline and leadership competences will need to be assured
Consequence of “not yet competent”
Level 1
Can’t carry out role when assessed “not yet competent” without supervision
Level 2 and Senior Leadership roles
Need support when making decisions / performing tasks
Top-down approach of establishing a network of approved assessors in each Business and BU
Primarily line supervisors / managers, and specialist
Will need their assessment and training to assess others
Effort required to implement
Level 1 assessment and assurance ongoing, expected minimal impact
Level 2 significant
Shell People
Requires upload competences and generic profiles, awaiting other functions
Gain oversight local entries HSE Critical roles requirement in Shell People
HSE Competence focal point for Shell People in PXE HSE Competence Assurance for HSE critical roles: Implications of the Proposal
22. 22
23. 23 Contractor HSE Management: integration into SCM process
24. 24
25. 25
26. 26
27. 27
28. HSE HEMP Minimum Standards
29. 29
30. 30
31. 31 Logistics: Land, Water & Air transport plus Lifting and Slinging
32. 32 2003 fatalities YTD
33. 33 2004 fatalities YTD
34. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 34 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
35. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 35 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
36. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 36 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
37. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 37 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
38. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 38 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
39. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 39 Road Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard Implementation Challenge
The largest target population in the EPS-HSE global processes (28,000 staff and 90,000 contractors – we are all a work related driver or a passenger at some point). How can we reach this target population?
Implementation of local Operating Company standards and full compliance of thereof on road safety has not been successful. How can we get to full compliance?
40. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 40
Air Transportation Global HSE Minimum Standard
41. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 41
Lifting and Hoisting Global HSE Minimum Standard
42. 42
43. 43
44. 44
45. 45
46. 46
47. 47 22 HSE Performance Monitoring and Reporting Group PMR / EP 95 0325 Upgrade
48. 48 Project Fountain Contents What is it? – Introduction
Why standardise? - The business drivers
Where are we now? – Current state of play
Long Term Plan
49. 49 Project Fountain – Introduction A common HSE Knowledge, Information and Data Management System for EP, implemented in 2004 (environmental component 2005)
Which will make data collection and collation transparent, more accurate, quicker, simpler and more efficient
It will turn data into information and finally into knowledge to fuel performance improvement
50. 50 Drivers for Project Fountain HSE data now ranks with Financial / Production data in the overall Shell Group External Reporting cycle - very tight deadlines
Struggle to deliver the data at the required standard within the deadlines, with the range of incompatible systems in place at the moment
Efficiency from Standardisation of systems, Sharing of a single system, Simplification of the process, and Speeding up by cleaning and streamlining
Improved functionality to turn data into information into knowledge which can be acted on to fuel performance improvement
A flagship project for the new way of working
Facilitate lateral learning from incidents and benchmarking thus creating targeted solutions leading to improved HSE performance
Global Contract - From typically 80-100 USD -> to less than 30 USD per license
51. 51 Drivers for Project Fountain (continued) Less auditing effort – possible savings of up to 50% of USD 4M Group annual costs
Single point support, upgrade – Server in Amsterdam
Phase out 40 of the existing 170 plus systems
Reduce development costs of many systems to focus on one
Standardised Training, Guides, Version control
Reduce non value activities - data entered only once
Less Stress to meet tighter deadlines – automated, links to global/local systems
Speed up
Global solutions to local problems
Small OU’s get sophisticated Tool
Level with Financial/HC systems
52. 52 Current Status Project Fountain Set up
Steering Committee (SC), Regional Project Team, Environmental Sub Team
Terms of reference agreed
Three key milestones passed – Decision Points 1-3
SC has Endorsed one common HSE IT system across EP
It will consist of 3 components
Health and Safety Performance Monitoring, Incident reporting & Follow up
Environmental performance Monitoring and GHG Trading
Knowledge Management
Software selected for Incident and Knowledge components
Commercial Council supported Dec 03 to award Incident Reporting contract
Environmental Implementation Team chartered
Consolidating functional specification with GHG Emission Traders
Technical and commercial evaluation of preferred vendor
Knowledge management system global contract is being set up and product is being upgraded with additional generic functionality
53. 53 Fountain - Incident reporting
54. 54 Global Application with Local “Fit to Business”
55. 55 Sample Incident Workflow Process
56. 56 Fountain – Knowledge Management It stores critical activity and hazard information specific to OUs, communities, disciplines and projects. It enables users to cut and filter this information to show accountabilities for individual positions and provides access to HSE alerts and incidents.
It facilitates the linkage of HSE alerts, incidents and near misses to the HSE MS structure itself. Hence, those events are brought to the attention of individuals who may benefit from the learnings associated with these items.
Tracking is available to ensure effective communication. It’s also possible to keep a history of HSE performance related to each element of the activity and hazard management structure (primarily critical tasks, hazard barriers and recovery measures), providing input to project planning and future hazard assessments.
57. 57 Fountain Knowledge Management
58. 58 Fountain Recommended Scope Out
SD (HSE covered, rest in Production, Finance, EA, HR)
Chemical datasheets (Group and outsourced)
Medical records on advice from Shell Health Services
In
Incident investigation, classification & reporting, environmental accounting (GHG ETS), HSE performance monitoring, waste management, chemical management, knowledge management, audit documentation, standards, procedures and best practices and business planning & critical review
Automatic links where possible
Enter data only once philosophy
59. 59
60. 60
61. 61
62. The 25 HSE Global Processes (one HSE-MS for EP) 62 HSE Global Processes
63. 63
64. 64 Extended HSE GLT Mandate Standardise and drive, through HSE Global Processes, consistent implementation of global HSE policies, strategies, standards and tools across EP delivering risk reduction
Custodian of global HSE standards and HSE elements EP Common MS
Ownership HSE business policies EP CEO, ownership HSE standards, procedures EPS
Sharing of best practices and make HSE standards accessible to front line staff
Set strategy for HSE and contribute to overall EP strategy
set prioritised action plan accordingly
Drive efficiency
Simplify, remove duplication, improve speed of implementation of global processes, cost benefit (avoidance of loss)
HSE skill pool management and deployment across regions
Act as conscience of CEO/EXEC or RLT on HSE and emerging HSE issues
Inspire HSE passion and support HSE behavioural programmes
Accountable to :
EPS / RSD
EXEC / RLT