E N D
1. Knowing health and wellbeing outcomes of regeneration Chris Mitchell
Corporate Research, Fife Council
2. Knowing we are making the right difference Context to the issue and Fife
three knowledge projects
Fife Public Health Dataset
Fife Social Justice Analysis System
Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study
some conclusions
4. The challenge No regeneration without social justice -
health inequality: for every one person who dies before they are 65 in Dalgety Bay, 6 people die in Mountfleurie, Levenmouth
Abbeyview - lost 3,000 of its 12,000 people in last 5 years of regeneration activity
unequal people or places? SID03 work data
Fife has 31,500 ‘employment deprived’ people of working age
65% of employment deprived do NOT live in most deprived 20% of wards
7. Fife Public Health Dataset Comprehensive web based dataset of social, economic and health indicators to evidence public policy
Jointly funded and managed by NHS Fife (Public Health) and Fife Council Children Services and Corporate Reseqrch
Full-time Co-ordinator plus support
14. `1
16. Fife Social Justice Analysis System (FSJAS) Longstanding question - do we ‘bend main programmes’ to follow social justice, community plan policy and urban aid etc?
ROA in Fife 2004-5: £1.8 million
Local mainstream public expenditure in Fife in 2004-5: £1.5 billion
“Do we put our money where our mouth is?”
Fife Partnership engaged Prof, Glen Bramley, Heriot Watt Univ. to help us find out
17. Tanshall Community Budgeting Pilot Small ‘Stitch in time’ regeneration area in Glenrothes - what do we spend on children?
Joined up picture of spending from finance and case records (unit costs and modelling), alongside needs analysis
per capita health spend > Fife average, < Glenrothes
primary education > Fife;
nursery and secondary education < Fife
Social work 3.7 times Fife average
Area Resource Analysis CAN be done
19. FSJAS Main Study Analysis of spending by service, client group & geographical area
Create shared database to provide routine, flexible access to this information
Integrate with data on needs, performance and outcomes
In the process, - review concepts & framework- review applications elsewhere- comment on initial findings on spend patterns- advise partners on development of info systems
21. Estimating Local Spending Mainly interested in spend by place of residence of service recipient- sometimes by facility - ‘on the ground’
Budget & accounting systems don’t record this
They go down to ‘cost centre’ level (e.g. school, area team, local office)
Need to use client records (postcodes)
Unit cost (adj for client characteristics) is link
Environmental etc. services more difficult- ‘on the ground’ – sample surveys - modelling
22. CD Based Tool with 2 modes ‘Profile’ - particular geographical area(s) of interest- preselected indicators- Fife & Scottish benchmarks- thematic pages- printed reports
‘Analyse’- many or all areas of a given type- select any combination of measures- counts & ratios- maps- download to Excel for further analysis
23. Primary Education Spend Reasonable expenditure estimates possible based on school budgets, pupil data on characteristics and postcodes
Model makes assumptions about costs associated with particular pupil characteristics e.g. FSM, RON, out of mainstream provision
Considerable variation in spend per pupil
Spend generally higher in rural areas (small schools)
ROAs only get 10% more spend than average
25. Primary spend by policy intervention
26. Health and Social Care
29. Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study Abbeyview predicament - who would benefit?
Social Exclusion Unit: ‘Some groups are last to benefit from polices designed to tackle social exclusion’.
2003-04 £150m+ of routine, remedial and regenerative local public spend on areas; £1.5m SIP
Fife Regeneration Health and Wellbeing Study
Phase 1: Literature review and research design - St Andrews University and Fife Partnership
Phase 2: 10 year action research study in regeneration areas – 3 components:
Aggregated quantitative analysis
Aggregated qualitative analysis
person centred tracking
30. Ph. 1 Literature Review Findings Overall, research limited and generally inconclusive: is evidence to link damp, cold housing with respiratory disease – but not much else
Can associate depression, anxiety with overcrowding and deprived neighbourhoods
Nature of these relationships, influence of other socio-economic factors make identification and direction of causation not straightforward.
Process of regeneration can worsen mental health and resilience
Need more research!
31. Phase 2 Fife Regeneration Study Began March 2005 - Hexagon consultants for first 3 years
Funding Communities Scotland, Fife Council, CRF
Focus on five areas, all with ROA Datazones plus others to make coherent focus of regeneration
West Fife Villages
Abbeyview, Dunfermline
Benarty and Lochgelly
Dysart, Smeaton,
Buckhaven and Methil
Small project steering group
Study will provide action research and monitoring for new Sustainable Communities Partnership Group
32. Phase 2 Objectives Baseline information about the key determinants of health and wellbeing for use over 10 years
M&E framework for policies, programmes and actions in regeneration areas
Track experience of a structured sample of individuals and families, mainly most excluded or at risk; assess risk/opportunities for action effectiveness of outcomes; person centred
Deliver guidance for regeneration activity to particularly maximise health and wellbeing benefits for most excluded or at risk
Draw lessons for improving health and wellbeing and disseminate widely
Inform and influence regularly the policy and practice of regeneration process at local and strategic levels - whole system action research
33. Where at now Constructing Baseline
Quantitative indicators from Public Health Dataset and existing evidence base for ROA and wider datazone groupings
Focus groups held to determine community derived measures of health and wellbeing
Preparation of questionnaire for survey based and qualitative evidence of health and wellbeing – includes panel recruitment linked to new People’s Panel for Fife
Monitoring and evaluation framework
Drafting for consideration by Sustainable Communities Group
34. Tracking Study - First year pilot Qualitative, person focused, potentially action research and person centred planning
recruiting 15 front-line workers across range of local services (health, education social work, employment, housing et al), preparatory workshops
Each worker to recruit one or two local people to meet with 12 times in year one for semi structured interview or activity working through:
Understanding of study
Developing a picture of health and wellbeing
Imagining community
Reflecting on services that impact on health and wellbeing
Evaluation and what’s next
Ethics Committee submission underway
35. Conclusions Fife Partnership - building our evidence base on needs, spend, activity and outcomes to show:
comprehensive wellbeing data set
resource data to inform priorities
if we are making a difference to the people and communities with greatest needs now and in the long term.
36. Systems do break some new ground
Support analysis at wide range of geographies from data zone building block- but precision is variable
All three systems are still developinge.g. more activity & spend data for FSJAS
Are starting to build longitudinal capacity so important for ensuring sustainable outcomes
37. More information www.fifedirect.org.uk - search on ‘research and knowledge’
contact chris.mitchell@fife.gov.uk or tel 01592 413267
Know Fife Findings