370 likes | 683 Views
Dual Polarization Technology: Coming Soon To a Radar Near You. Paul Schlatter Warning Decision Training Branch. Outline. Overview Base and Derived Products What to expect Training During Upgrade. WSR-88D with Dual-Pol. Transmitted at 45 o Polarization.
E N D
Dual Polarization Technology:Coming Soon To a Radar Near You Paul Schlatter Warning Decision Training Branch
Outline • Overview • Base and Derived Products • What to expect • Training • During Upgrade
WSR-88D with Dual-Pol • Transmitted at 45o Polarization
Compare to Current WSR-88D (NEXRAD) Policy of “Do no harm” Retrofit on existing dish, tower, etc. Same scanning strategies Same data resolution Velocity, SW, Reflectivity, Algorithms: Unchanged
List of New Products via Dual-Pol • Differential Reflectivity (ZDR) • Correlation Coefficient (CC) • Specific Differential Phase (KDP) • Algorithms • Melting Layer • Hydrometeor Classification • 9 NEW Precipitation Estimation Products
Physical Interpretation Zv Zv Zv Zh Zh Zh Zh ~ Zv Zh > Zv Zh < Zv
KOUN 0.5 deg Z
KOUN 0.5 deg ZDR
KOUN 0.5 deg Z
KOUN 0.5 deg ZDR
KOUN 0.5 deg Z
KOUN 0.5 deg CC
Differential Phase Shift (ΦDP “PhiDP”) • Horizontal and vertical pulses slow down through medium • Causes phase shifts in both pulses • Phase shifts are different depending on target shape and concentration • Immune to partial beam blockage, attenuation, hail • Difference in phase shifts = ΦDP
Physical Interpretation • Similar to ZDR • Particle Concentration FDP = 0 FDP = Decreases FDP = Increases FDP = 10o FDP = 25o
KDP is what you will be interpreting (unless you have GR analyst and love loads of pretty colors) From PhiDP to KDP Gradients Most Important
Running Review of the DP Products ZDR: Indicator of hail and median rain drop size CC: Distinguish precip vs. non precip and homogeneous vs widely varying precip type KDP: Identify heavy rain; immune to blockage and hail
Base Data Summary • Need to integrate at a minimum Z, ZDR, and CC to analyze the situation to determine precip type • AWIPS is ready • How realistic is that during the crunch of a warning decision? • Richard Dreyfuss as Dr. Leo Marvin
1. Melting Layer Detection Algorithm 4.3o CC • Melting hydrometeors easy to detect • CC decreases to ~0.90
2. Hydrometeor Classification Algorithm • Algorithm makes best guess of dominant radar echo type • For every radar elevation angle Lgt/mod rain Heavy rain Hail “Big drops” Graupel Ice crystals Dry snow Wet snow Unknown AP or Clutter Biological Current Classification Options
KOUN 0.5 deg Z6.6 kft MSL in hail KOUN 0.5 Deg Z 1.5” hail reports
KOUN 0.5 deg HC6.6 kft MSL in hail KOUN 0.5 Deg Z AP Tagged Fairly Well 1.5” hail reports
3. Dual-Pol QPE • Research in C. Oklahoma has shown DP QPE superior to traditional Z(R), reducing error by 50% within ~80 nm
When/What is the Impact? • All WSR-88Ds upgraded 2010-2012 • 10-14 days radar downtime during upgrade
Questions? Paul.T.Schlatter@noaa.gov www.wdtb.noaa.gov/modules/dualpol