150 likes | 385 Views
Surface Navy Association. Mr. Chris Deegan Executive Director Program Executive Officer Integrated Warfare Systems January 16, 2013. Dual Band Radar. SM-2 / SM-6. CEC. SSDS. PVLS. IUSW. AGS. Sea Sparrow. SPS-48E Radar. Phalanx. Aegis Combat System. ESSM. SEWIP. SPS-49 Radar.
E N D
Surface Navy Association Mr. Chris Deegan Executive Director Program Executive Officer Integrated Warfare Systems January 16, 2013
Dual Band Radar SM-2 / SM-6 CEC SSDS PVLS IUSW AGS Sea Sparrow SPS-48ERadar Phalanx Aegis Combat System ESSM SEWIP SPS-49 Radar SPY1 ANSQQ89 MK 41VLS AN/SLQ-32(v4) MK 45 Program Executive OfficerIntegrated Warfare Systems • The PEO IWS organization is aligned to develop, procure and deliver Enterprise Warfighting Solutions for Surface Ships • DELIVERY • 238 USN Ships • 78 USCG Ships • 25 Nations • PEO IWS executes $5B - $6B annually • PEO IWS has life cycle responsibilities for combat system performance, design management, systems engineering, installation, integration, test, maintenance and disposal Engage • INNOVATION • APLs • Industry • NSWC • NUWC • ONR • SBIR/SST • DARPA • Aegis BMD Detect Control AMDR 155 Programs: 4 - ACAT I7 - ACAT II4 - ACAT III5 - ACAT IV6 - R&D41 - Inactive88 - Non ACAT Personnel: Control Onbd. Direct 347 345 Reimb. 67 65 MilPers 50 50
CNO’s Sailing Directions • Warfighting First • Operate Forward • Be Ready • “We will deliver credible capability for deterrence, sea control, and power projection to deter or contain conflict and fight and win wars.” “We will address economic change by being effective and efficient. We will innovate to: • Use new technologies and operating concepts to sharpen our warfighting advantage against evolving threats; • Operate forwardat strategic maritime crossroads; • Sustain our fleet capability through effective maintenance, timely modernization, and sustained production of proven ships and aircraft; • Provide our Sailors confidence in their equipment and in their own skills.” PEO IWS Priority: Deliver and Maintain “Whole” Warfighting Capability
SM-6 CEC AGS Aegis Combat System ACBs ESSM ANSQQ89 (V)15 Rapidly Evolving Missions Drive Navy Capability Advancements Operational Environment Complex Threats Employing Advanced Technology in Challenging Environments Short and Medium Range Ballistic Missiles Humanitarian Assistance Persistent ISR Simultaneous Raids Across Multiple Mission Areas Sub-Sonic Anti-Air & Anti-Surface Missiles Intermediate Range Ballistic Missiles CIWS Blk 1B Small Boat Attacks Cyber Warfare Anti-Piracy Fire Support Missions Super-Sonic Anti-Air & Anti-Surface Missiles Mk 38 Gun DisasterRelief Torpedoes Anti-Ship Ballistic Missiles Advanced Super-Sonic Anti-Air & Anti-Ship Missiles Stealth Under-Sea Engage Long Range Ballistic Missiles AMDR Mines Dual Band Radar Rail Guns Advanced ASW Cyber Defense Over Land Defense Multi-Ship Resource Coordination Enhanced Shipboard Sensors (Radar + ES/EA) Capability Advancements Directed Energy ImprovedSelf-Defense Area Air Defense In Clutter Environments UAVIntegration Integrated Air and Missile Defense Integrated AAW & Situational Awareness High Data Rate Battle Group Networks SSDS ACBs
PEO IWS “Big Picture” Strategy • Eliminate stovepiped, obsolete hardware and software • Introduce Network-based COTS computing environment • Reduce combat systems and weapon system variants • Apply a family of systems and functional architectures across the Fleet where applicable Enhanced mission capability across the Surface Fleet with faster and more affordable upgrades that are interoperable and pace the threat
Navy Technical and Operational Architecture • Navy surface forces operate in a regional joint networked environment with joint and coalition forces • Link 16 – Joint operations, situational awareness, BMD • Cooperative Engagement Capability – Integrated surface force tracking and engagement network, Navy IFC • Surface combatant force foundation is Multi-mission operations • Area Air Defense, Ballistic Missile Defense, Under Sea, Surface, Strike, Naval Gunfire Support • Driven by COCOM requirements to operate forward • Strategy of Advanced Capability Builds provides incremental warfighting improvements for countering evolving threats with new capability • Network based COTS computing environments enable rapid insertion of new capabilities to meet threat drivers • COTS allows for faster upgrades and reduces combat system variants
BPPI 2.0 Focus Areas • Achieve Affordable Areas • Ex: Established Economic Order of Quantity in a Multi-Year Procurement Cost Avoidance for AEGIS Production • Control Costs Throughout the Product Lifecycle • Ex: Maritime IAMD Planning System (MIPS) transition to IBM Blade Server • Incentivize Producibility & Innovation in Industry & Government • Ex: AMDR competition has stimulated $100M+ in Industry Internal Research and Development (IRAD) • Eliminate Unproductive Processes & Bureaucracy • Ex: Designated CEC from ACAT 1D to ACAT IC reduces OSD-level review requirements • Promote Effective Competition • Ex: Obtain Data Rights on Development Contracts for Full & Open Competition at Full Rate Production • Improve Tradecraft in Acquisition of Services • Ex: Implemented AEGIS Fleet Readiness Program Manager • Improve the Professionalism of the Total Acquisition Workforce • Ex: Executing DAWIA Cross-Discipline Training Plan
Capability Trends Current Systems Future Systems MH-60R Integration Increased Integration of On-board Mission Systems Individual On-board Mission Systems (AAW, BMD, USW, etc.) SPY-1 MMSP Upgrade Ships with AAW focus Or BMD focus Integrated AAW and BMD AMDR-S Rotating Radars On Carriers Phased Arrays on Carriers Volume Search Radar Advanced Phased Array Technology Improved SPY-1 variants on CGs and DDGs SEWIP Integrated Hard Kill & Soft Kill Independent Hard Kill and Soft Kill Systems Improved Electronic Attack for Soft Kill CM/Decoys for Soft Kill MK38 Gun System Automated Gun Systems for Small Boat Raids Manually Operated Small Guns Extended Battlespace Through EOR using SPY-equipped Ships More Flexible EOR Expanding To Other Navy/Force Sensors AEGIS Ashore NIFC-CA SBT SM-3 BLK IIA
Looking Ahead • Combat Systems will continue to transition to network-based COTS Computing Environment to support future warfighting improvements • Future surface combat systems ACBs will be developed based on common objective architecture with Government validated interfaces and components applicable to multiple ship classes • Working with NAVAIR and RMS on multiple paths to reduce missile procurement costs by leveraging shared product lines • Competitions will continue to be conducted when appropriate • FMS will continue as a vital part of the business Increased Computing Power Performance, Network-based Architecture, Leveraged Common Systems, and FMS Opportunities will Enable More Affordable and Capable Warfighting Improvements