1 / 26

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation. May 2012. Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs . Total no. candidates :67. Day1 :28 th May 2012. Day 2 :29 th May 2012. Day 3: 30 th May 2012. Day 3: 30 th May 2012.

erasto
Download Presentation

Primary MCQ Course Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Primary MCQ Course Evaluation May 2012

  2. Mean score represented as bar charts. 1= poor 5= excellent Mean score for each subject is presented as bar graphs. Total no. candidates:67 Mean score, maximum being 5

  3. Day1 :28th May 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  4. Day 2 :29th May 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  5. Day 3: 30th May 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  6. Day 3: 30th May 2012 Mean score, maximum being 5

  7. Overall value of the course 1= waste of money/time, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  8. Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  9. Primary FRCA MCQ Course evaluation 1: very poor 2: poor 3: Satisfactory 4: good 5: excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  10. Value of pre-course MCQ Practice1= very poor, 5 being excellent y axis represents number of candidates

  11. Comments-general • Thanks a lot for giving us such a good environment of competition • very helpful in boosting up our morals for exam • Course was very well organised, highly appreciable

  12. Comments-general • Well definitely useful the only thing is that it would be better a month before the exam which would give adequate time to improve knowledge as well as MCQ technique. • Difficult to fit so much content in 3 days - losing concentration by 7pm • Day 2 was very tiring - consider splitting the day somehow. • Very useful course - lots of question practice and interactive session to augment/clarify knowledge. • Change to 4 day course with shorter days.

  13. Comments: general • Wish I knew sooner! My school didn't encourage courses for MCQ nor was I aware of the SBA tricks! • Well looked after and very good organisation, lots of questions and I really liked the mock exam. • Very good course but improvement regarding: 1) Time management → needs to be much quicker 2nd day was too long.

  14. Comments: Pharmacology 1 • Good speaker Slide font sizes are too small kindly use big and bold fonts with contrasting background • Good slides and pace Excellent session - focused on key points arising from MCQ's with good focus on learning points • Friendly, interactive and informative, well paced, well presented and clear and relevant Good pace, good explanations and up to date information as examples

  15. Comments: Pharmacology 2 • Decent speed and good content • Slide font sizes are too small kindly use big and bold fonts with contrasting background • Discrepancy with answer from the morning. • Have all the questions been vetted prior to the presentations? • Good pace and explanations • Good timing and good explanations of each question

  16. Comments:Pharmacology 3 • Good pace Excellent teacher • Excellent one for the end of the day - knew everything he was talking about, explained well • Good end to the day, totally woke up the audience at the end of the day • Very funny and makes the topic more interesting • Fantastic lecture and excellent presentations absolutely brilliant Very good explanations

  17. Comments:Pharmacology 4 • Really hard SBA's! • Useful tips and clear facts that are related even if not in the question. • Good questions well presented. • Good explanations of MCQ's but would prefer to have better explanations of SBA’s. • Fantastic teaching, engaging. • Good set of question, entertaining speaker. • Very good, problems with IT though!! Succinct delivery and key points, very useful information

  18. SBA set 1 • Good time keeping Very useful indeed • Slide font sizes are too small kindly use big and bold fonts with contrasting background • Interesting format • Quality presentation/explanations • Very useful and exam relevant • Good pace and explanations • Good questions Relaxed presentation style, clear explanations of reasons behind answers • Steady pace and good explanation

  19. Physics 1 • Good questions and presentation. • Very good set of questions for physics. • Good pace and good diagrams. • Very good presentation, good knowledge and explanation. • Clear explanations and exam relevant questions, useful knowledge gained.

  20. Physics 2 • Approachable and friendly • Difficult set of questions but clear and relevant slides • Questions perhaps slightly difficult. • Nice diagrams and slides • Too fast, some explanations of answers needed further clarification

  21. Physics 3 • Good slides - helpful to have and explanation below each answer. • Good explanation knew topics well. • Succinct and useful information in slides. • Excellent material, very useful and relevant topics. • Good discussion, responded well to questions.

  22. Comments: SBAs set 3 • Good questions and presentation. • Explanation slides would be useful especially for calculation questions. • Needed explanation for cylinder calculations. • Very good questions and answers, covered the topic very well. • Best one of them all - difficult topic to cover. • Reasonable pace slightly rushed towards the end.

  23. Comments: Physiology day 1 • Approachable and friendly • Good pace and answers were good on the slide • Diagrams on slides were too small to read • Difficult set of questions but clear and relevant slides. • Nice diagrams and slides • Too fast, some explanations of answers needed further clarification

  24. Comments: Physiology day 2 • Very clear good slides. Good questions and presentation. • Very good and clear answers to questions of a difficult subject - very useful and informative. • Good clear explanations, delivered well. • Useful diagrams to explain answers. Good pace, good answers, difficult topic. • Good presentation and good explanations. • Particularly impressed by the exploratory nature of accompanying slides which enhances clear explanation.

  25. Comments:Physiology day 3 • Good explanation of difficult respiratory concepts. • Willing to delve into explainable but this made the session drag a bit. • Best session in terms of clear explanation of concepts and moved quickly through areas that everyone was confident on. • Very useful session, exam relevant question that enforced key knowledge • very approachable and keen to interact/help. Very open to questions.

  26. Comments: Test paper • As always well presented. Useful information, reinforced earlier topic. • Good presentation of answers and explanations. • Good slides, enthusiastic. Good set of questions, relevant and well explained, friendly and gave useful information. Encouraging and lively speaker, clear explanations. Good technique and presentation slides. • Very helpful questions, approachable attitude • Very nice and friendly, good explanations at reasonable speed. Good content. Well delivered, interactive session and key points made. • Hard SBAs but highlighted gaps in knowledge. Good mix of topics, some ambiguity in a few of the answers though.

More Related