120 likes | 144 Views
Industry Perspective on Air Issues. Arizona Chemical. A World of Good Ideas. Richard Lee, Environmental Manager. Who is Arizona Chemical?. Wholly owned by International Paper World-class supplier of pine chemicals 1,800 employees worldwide 14 manufacturing facilities worldwide
E N D
Industry Perspective on Air Issues Arizona Chemical A World of Good Ideas Richard Lee, Environmental Manager
Who is Arizona Chemical? • Wholly owned by International Paper • World-class supplier ofpine chemicals • 1,800 employees worldwide • 14 manufacturing facilities worldwide • 3 manufacturing facilities in Florida • Headquarters in Jacksonville, Florida • Welcome and respectedcorporate citizen
Where are we located? FLORIDAPanama CityPort St. JoePensacola GEORGIASavannahValdosta MISSISSIPPIPicayune OHIODover United States H H H H H H H
History 1930 International Paper & American Cyanamid JV formed 1936 Begin crude sulfate turpentine fractionation in Panama City 1949 Begin crude tall oil fractionation in Panama city 1985 Wholly-owned subsidiary of International Paper 1986 Sylvachem acquisition, Port St. Joe 1989 Reichhold/Newport division acquisition, Pensacola
KRAFT PULPING Crude Turpentine (CST) Crude Tall Oil (CTO) Other Distillates Alpha Pinene Other Distillates Tall Oil Rosin Beta Pinene Tall Oil Fatty Acids Adhesives Packaging Nonwovens Bookbinding Tapes LithographicInks LithographicGravure Inks Chewing Gum SyntheticRubber-making Anise Flavoring Pine Oil Cleaners PackagingAdhesives PressureSensitiveAdhesives PolymerAdditives ChewingGum Paints & Coatings Flexographic Inks Ink Solvents PressureSensitiveAdhesives SpecialtyPackagingAdhesives NonwovenAdhesives Ore Flotation Rubber Processing Emulsifiers
Customer Industries • Adhesives • Agriculture • Automotive • Chewing Gum • Coatings • Construction • Flavor & Fragrance • Food & Beverages • Graphic Arts • Lubricants • Metalworking • Mining • Oil Field • Paper • Polymer Additive • Rubber • Soaps & Cleaners • Textiles
Panama City Plant P2 Activities • 80+% reduction in TRI emissions (EPA Hammer Award) • 60+% reduction in hazardous waste generation • 51% reduction in consumptive use of well water • 300+ TPY reduction in air emissions (VOCs and TRS)
Factors Affecting the Project • Major production units installed prior to air permitting regulations • Major production units remained unregulated in the Title V Permit issued in 1998 • Very high potentials to emit for these unregulated units. • EPA’s PSD reinterpretation • Challenge to increase production quickly
Options • Modify process only (Construction Permit required) • Modify the process and install new pollution control equipment (Construction Permit required) • Emission increase, decrease, or no change • Complete or partial emissions control
Our Solution • Installation of pollution control device pictured at the right • Partial control of process emissions • Emissions reductions exceeding 300 TPY • Increase in allowable production rates of >25% • Met project timelines
Lessons Learned • Involve FDEP early and often • If possible, treat your regulator as a project team member • Put yourself in the regulator’s place, the more you can offer the faster the project timeline • Make sure that all parties involved are getting something from the project