1 / 16

Structured Decision Making

Structured Decision Making. Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006. Goal of Structured Decision Making “Better Protection of Children” . Benefits Improve assessments of CPS family situations to better ascertain the protection needs of children Provides simple and objective tools for workers

erelah
Download Presentation

Structured Decision Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006

  2. Goal of Structured Decision Making“Better Protection of Children” • Benefits • Improve assessments of CPS family situations to better ascertain the protection needs of children • Provides simple and objective tools for workers • Reliability and consistency • Research based • Allows for prioritization • Provide data for improvement of services

  3. System Goals • Reduce rate of subsequent abuse/neglect reports • Reduce the severity of subsequent abuse/neglect reports • Reduce the rate of foster care placement • Reduce the length of stay in foster care

  4. Components to Structured Decision Making • Response Priority • Safety Assessment • Risk Assessment • Family Needs and Strengths Assessment • Case Planning and Management • Case Reassessment • Workforce Based Resource Allocation • Role of Management Information System

  5. Response Priority • All maltreatment reports assigned for investigation • At time is received • Tells you how quickly to respond • Levels 1,2 or 3

  6. Safety Assessment (now) • All maltreatment reports assigned for investigation that involve a family caregiver • Process applied at first face to face meeting (prior to allowing child to remain in household) • Removal and return of child to family • ID factors that threaten immediate harm to child • ID need for safety plan

  7. Risk Assessment (future) • All maltreatment reports assigned for investigation that involve a family caregiver • Prior to assessment disposition (its used to decide disposition) • Determine risk level of future maltreatment • Close or Open case for ongoing service • Guides contact standards

  8. Family Assessment of Needs and Strengths • All cases open for ongoing service • Within 30 days of case assigned to ongoing workers • Determine areas of family needs and strength that can be utilized in case planning

  9. Alternative Response • Assisting families to keep kids safe • Meet specific criteria • Option Statement/Agreement • Voluntary

  10. Risk/Needs Reassessment • Risk (when children are in home) • Needs (all ongoing cases) • First review within 90 days of first treatment plan. Then quarterly afterward or anytime significant change occurs • Measure progress, adjust service level, case closure

  11. Reunification Assessment • All CPS cases with at least one child in placement and goal of returning home • First review within 90 days of first treatment plan, then quarterly. • Prior to court hearings and whenever return home considered. • Help decide eligibility to return home, or if new permanency plan needed

  12. Assessing Diverse Families Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006

  13. Suspicion and Culture • Culture and Poverty • Under and Over reporting

  14. False Positives • Sleeping Arrangements • Flexible boundaries (household compositions) • Small size of children • Appearance and hygiene • Clothing • Responses to authorities • Lack of cooperation • Unfamiliar disciplinary methods • Unfamiliar medical interventions • Unfamiliar practices • Care of Newborns • Linguistic Misunderstanding

  15. False Negatives and the use of Culture as a Justification • Failure to recognize a given practice as maltreatment because of cultural differences. • Culture as a mask or smokescreen

  16. Culture and Abuse • Some families may have to abandon certain practices that were tolerated in their countries of origin • Should be taken into consideration when assessing the family’s overall stability and most appropriate intervention.

More Related