1 / 17

Contract Year 1 Review IMT

Contract Year 1 Review IMT. Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002. Program Development Approach. Major Issues Addressed As NCSA Core Lead Classified contract Updating UI financial system after late start date Performance and Hiring as impacted by IL State budget crisis.

eric-barber
Download Presentation

Contract Year 1 Review IMT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Contract Year 1 ReviewIMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002

  2. Program Development Approach • Major Issues Addressed As NCSA Core Lead • Classified contract • Updating UI financial system after late start date • Performance and Hiring as impacted by IL State budget crisis Contract Year 1 Review

  3. Program Development Approach • Major Issues Addressed As FAPOC • Engaging T&E Community • Who, where, what • Level of HPC expertise • On-site performance and security • Program development barriers • T&E Community has limited HPC expertise • Sense that HPC/PET is trying to “tell them how to do their job” • In general, 50% of the funding for a T&E center is yearly customer funds, and as a result, their time horizon is short (3 to 6 months) • Projects are of limited interest given the relatively long development time Contract Year 1 Review

  4. Strategic Goals for IMT • Top priorities: • Application of HPC software tools and techniques with live tests and hardware-in-the-loop simulations for test and evaluation. • Tools for collecting, organizing, and combining diverse information sets to optimally guide T&E decision making. • Concentrate on: • High-fidelity component and process models • Real-time model execution • Integration of information from disparate sources • Test data repositories • Optimal Test Strategy Planning • Building IMT Communities of practice • Training in new software tools & methodologies (Core) Contract Year 1 Review

  5. FY03 PROJECT PLANNING: IMT FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 • High-fidelity component and process models • Real-time models • Information Integration • Test data repositories • Optimal test planning • Building IMT communities of practice OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING IMT 002 CROSS-FA PROGRAMS CORE R-T INTEROPERABILITY MODEL DATA REDUCTION OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING CORE TRANINING STATISTICS DATA REPOSITORIES DATA REPOSITORIES IMT 002 OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING DATA REPOSITORIES IMT 006 OPT. T&E DECISION MAKING Contract Year 1 Review

  6. Technical (Metrics) • User Codes Impacted by PET • Logistics Common Model • Deployment planning and system acquisition analysis tool • TENA - Test and Training Enabling Architecture • Logical Range Enabler, see Joint Test and Training Range Roadmap (JTTRR) Contract Year 1 Review

  7. Technical (Metrics) • User Contacts and Assistance • HPC Users: 3. Total of 9 months duration • Direct Contact: • T&E working staff: 19 • T&E Management: 11 Contract Year 1 Review

  8. Technical (Metrics) • Tools introduced to community • Parallel LCOM • Users have low HPC skills • Intensive use by 3 to 5 DoD staff • Logistics tail a major DoD expense and system evaluation criteria Contract Year 1 Review

  9. Technical (Metrics) • Presentations Given: 5 • Conferences Held: NTR • Workshops Held: NTR • Seminars Held: NTR • Training Held: In progress: WSMC intro to parallel programming, ATC datamining and data warehousing introduction Contract Year 1 Review

  10. Technical (Metrics) • Technical Reports and Articles • None Contract Year 1 Review

  11. IMT 002 Deployment Logistics Planning • Budget - $75,000 • Period of Performance: • 10/01 to 10/02 • PI: Tilt Thompkins • Objective: Implement the infrastructure needed to bring PET-1 capabilities into general DoD use Deliverables Green: Generic Simulation Wrapping and convert to handle new LCOM version Green: Improved HPC back-end and response surface generation capability Green: Final Project Technical Report, 1 Oct 02 Yellow: Simplified User interface, 15 March 02 Yellow: Training Package – 15 April 02 Yellow: Demonstrate Mission Capable Rate Optimization– 31 May 02 Yellow: Delayed for early focus on HPC back-end Contract Year 1 Review

  12. IMT 006 Training and User-Focused Workshops • Budget - $100,000 • Period of Performance: • 10/01 to 10/02 • PI: Tilt Thompkins • Objective: develop and deliver a user-centric training and problem development program Deliverables Yellow: Develop base training materials Yellow: Deliver four four day workshops Yellow: Deliver four, two day, training classes Developing requirements proved much more difficult than expected. Workshops now being scheduled for June and July Contract Year 1 Review

  13. IMT Invoice Status Contract Year 1 Review

  14. IMT Budget March - 68% of Plan Forecast 90% of Plan Contract Year 1 Review

  15. IMT Budget March - 61% of Plan Forecast 66% of Plan Contract Year 1 Review

  16. Staffing • 2 On-Sites, ARL and AEDC • 1 New Hire for AEDC • 1 departed due to performance issues, ARL • AEDC Position required 5 months to fill, security clearance issues have delayed arrival at AEDC • ARL position now open Contract Year 1 Review

  17. Summary • University billing mistakes resolved and invoices should reflect close to estimated. • On-Sites • Open slot at ARL • Security issues remain at AEDC Contract Year 1 Review

More Related