190 likes | 342 Views
geologic hazards and space geodesy. part 4: integrating GPS into warning and response. Can we design a better tsunami alert system?. Reduce false alarms don’t cause panic; educate people on how to react Warn everybody - needs to be in the right language Broadcast Radio TV
E N D
geologic hazards and space geodesy part 4: integrating GPS into warning and response
Can we design a better tsunami alert system? • Reduce false alarms • don’t cause panic; educate people on how to react • Warn everybody - needs to be in the right language • Broadcast • Radio • TV • Satellite telecommunication • Cell phone • GPS • Sirens or Loudspeakers? One can trigger the next so as to propagate the alarm rapidly (not backwards, don’t want to jam comm’s with a back-propagating notification) • Buoy system can directly notify and propagate alert signal through satellite and all other telecomm links immediately • Airplane, blimp or helicopter with loudspeakers or sign towed behind it?
Can we design a better tsunami evacuation, safety and survival system? (some of the solutions need to work even for very low-lying islands and other coastal plain areas) • Underground bunker (waterproof hatches like a submarine) • Strong tall buildings with extra capacity stairwells for people to run up very quickly to higher levels where it’s safe, and lots of emergency supplies, water and food stored up high • Could have a big red flashing light and siren on top • Boats with large capacity that can launch quickly and get out into deep water very fast • Airplanes with large capacity that can get airborne quickly • Helicopters with tremendous lifting capacity so that they can sling-load many people to safe high ground, load after load • Special roads heading straight to high ground, which could have special high-capacity cars to move quickly and make many trips back and forth to shuttle many people
Basic warning elements • Know an event happened as fast as possible • Know the location of an event • Know the size of an event • Know the probability that an event produced a tsunami
Linear FRC. Nonlinear DISP. Permanent displacement Automated Tagging and Real-Time Damage Distribution Maps AUTOMATED TAGGING AND REAL-TIME DAMAGE DISTRIBUTION MAPS • Multiple sensor package: • Acceleration / Velocity • Displacement (GPS) • Rotation (tilt-meter) • Pre-earthquake: • Reference static displacement • Reference static rotation • Mean and variance of dynamic characteristics • Post-earthquake: • Permanent static displacement • Permanent static rotation • Mean and variance of dynamic characteristics • During earthquake: • Changes in dynamic characteristics • Hysteretic behavior • Damage initiation
GPS real-time displacement 1-Hz data
GPS buoy systems • NOAA DART buoys are expensive and high maintenance • GPS can be used for large numbers of low-cost buoys to complement existing system • NavCom-AXYS contract for US Navy (NAVOCEANO); 2 cm inshore, 10 cm offshore • NOAA-USGS testing program for warning application • Tie in with existing earthquake and weather monitoring and alerts
Basic response elements • Know the location of damage • Know the extent of damage • Know the type of damage and therefore the response required
GPS results • GPS surveys before and after the earthquake are differenced to obtain 3D vectors of permanent deformation (courtesy of CESS, SEIRES) • Deformation data are modeled to obtain slip on the fault plane, especially in areas complementary to seismology
Remote sensing • (a) Pre-earthquake and (b) post-earthquake Advanced Space-borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) images of North Sentinel Island, showing emergence of the coral reef surrounding the island. (c) Pre-earthquake and (d) post-earthquake ASTER images of a small island off the northwest coast of Rutland Island, 38 km east of North Sentinel Island, showing submergence of the coral reef surrounding the island. The “pivot line” must run between North Sentinel and Rutland islands. Note that the scale for the North Sentinel Island images differs from that for the Rutland Island images. Scale bars as follows: left (a-b) 0-6 km; right (c-d) 0-1 km. (ASTER images courtesy of NASA/JPL from Meltzner et al., 2006).
What do GPS and Before & After images tell us? • Derive damage assessment maps: • Indicate areas most severely affected by shaking & inundation • Provide rapid and comprehensive information needed in support of decisions on prioritization for resource deployment • Help with vital logistical aspects of relief efforts (e.g., Can ports be used for shipping? Are bridges knocked out? Where are survivors?) • Validate & verify rapidly estimated finite-fault slip models (e.g., predicted vs. observed coastal uplift & submergence) • provide important input data to refine fault source models • Tsunami inundation map data as input to tsunami propagation models • Flood data to assess saline infiltration and damage to irrigable lands and water supplies; is flooding permanent or transient? • Commercial and other imagery and analysis tools have reached a new level of utility with recent disaster responses • still require calibration, ground-truthing, validation, and algorithm & software development • promising for future rapid assessment & quantification
California Prototype GPS fault slip sensor; up to 10 Hz Spans the San Andreas fault near Gorman, California
San Andreas - instrument majorlifeline infrastructure crossings L A
Cajon Pass I-15 Fault Crossing Need a real-time GPS array right here... need before (B4) and after imaging for rapid assessment of damage to lifeline infrastructure