280 likes | 300 Views
Finding Quality: Getting a 2 nd Opinion (or How To Use the S&P Quality Ranking). By Kevin Gillogly For Happy Destiny Investment Club July 2005. Measuring Managerial Ability.
E N D
Finding Quality:Getting a 2nd Opinion (or How To Use the S&P Quality Ranking) By Kevin Gillogly For Happy Destiny Investment Club July 2005
Measuring Managerial Ability “A statement of actual earnings, over a period of years, with a reasonable expectation of that these will be approximated in the future. The record must cover a number of years, first because a continued or repeat performance is always more impressive than a single occurrence, and secondly because the average of a fairly long period will tend to absorb and equalize, the distorting influences of the business cycle.” – Benjamin Graham and David Dodd Security Analysis
What is Quality? • As long-term investors, we look for quality growth companies • What does quality looks like? • On the SSG it is consistency of Sales, Pre-Tax Profit (PTP) margins, and EPS • Is it well managed? • On the SSG it is the trends on the graph and in Sec. 2 (Evaluating Management) • Want a 2nd opinion? • Where do you turn?
Finding Quality Myriad ways to find quality without doing a SSG. Not one is perfect. All have some limitations. • The Stock Check List • SSG on training wheels • Looks at a sample of the past 7 years • Quick cut; “Wrong” years can lead to misinterpretation • Take Stock software • Shows the Better Investing concepts in 4 clicks • Goes through quality points found on the SSG • Can be conservative; Can miss some good choices
Other Forms of Quality Non Better Investing forms: • Kausch Meisheri’s Quick Analysis • Looks at the trends of the past 10 years worth of Value Line (VL) data • Quick cut; but can’t tell if the price is right • Mark Robertson’s 60 Second Equity Analysis • Also uses VL data • A Quality Ranking that can be compared across industries and uses projections in the calculations
How Strong Are These Companies? Most of the previous metrics look at sales, EPS and margins. • What about financial stability? • How strong is management? • Can a company survive a financial hit? • Where do we turn? metric n., a system of measurement
Looking For Independent^ Quality Ratings* Sources: • Morningstar Stock Investor • Newest on block • Uses “Stewardship” grade & Star Rating • Value Line • Peter Lynch “like hiring your own analyst” • Financial Strength & Earnings Predictability • Standard & Poor’s • Used by founders of Better Investing • Quality Ranking ^ = reputable w/ no brokerage business * = no price component
S&P Quality Ranking • Formally known as S&P Earnings and Dividend Ranking • Proprietary measure started in 1956 • Attempts to measure Graham & Dodd’s sustainable earnings power • See quote on page 2 • Measures long-term growth and stability of earnings and dividends. • Focus is on the last 10 years worth of data • Covers over 3,500 US based companies
Why Use It? According to back-testing by S&P when compared to lower ranked companies, high quality rankings have: • Less risk; • Lower debt levels, higher profit margins and higher return on equity; • Less likely to engage in accounting manipulations; And • Outperformed the S&P 500 index
How To Use It • Simple and quick way to determine if company is worth studying • Screening Shorthand • Simple and quick way to determine if company is worth keeping • Portfolio Management Shorthand • Uses letter grades • 8 in total Remember to do your own research!
Where To Find It Two places: • S&P Company Report (aka “tearsheet”) • On-line Premium Service (OPS) • Can drop straight into Toolkit (TK5), Stock Analyst (SA 3.1), and Prospector (NSP 2.6) • Not available in Classic (NCP 2.3) • Can also be used in MS Excel
Translating the Grades * • A+ Highest ( 2%; 81 companies) • A High ( 6%; 204) • A- Above Ave. ( 6%; 233) • B+ Average (16%; 576) • B Below Ave. (19%; 702) • B- Lower (26%; 966) • C Lowest (24%; 872) • D In reorg. ( 1%; 36) • LIQ Liquidation • NR Not Ranked (3670 companies) * Source: OPS 3705 cos. w/ Quality Rank Jun 05
Translating into NSP * • A+ Highest 8 • A High 7 • A- Above Ave. 6 • B+ Average 5 • B Below Ave. 4 • B- Lower 3 • C Lowest 2 • D In reorg. 1 • NR Not Ranked 0 * NAIC Stock Prospector
S&P Quality as a Cross Check Can Be Found • In screening of Prospector
S&P Quality as a Cross Check Can Be Found • In the Portfolio Portion of Stock Analyst
Benefit of S&P Quality Rating Combines some key aspects of the SSG • Growth and stability of earnings • Growth and stability of dividends
Limitations of S&P Quality Rating Misses key aspects of the SSG • No forecast of future Sales & EPS growth rates • Does not help determine future value Misses key aspects of the SCG • Measuring to its peers • Measuring the better return
From Quality to Performance • Top Return to Risk Was Not Found in stocks with the highest ranking, “A+” • Two notches below, “A-”, preformed best. • Price Premium of top ranking • That’s still leaves over 200 companies (with a ranking of A-) to examine that could be potential purchases
Quality to Performance S&P Quality Ranking will not help finding undiscovered “gems” of the stock market: • Penalizes companies not paying a dividend • Highest they earn is a “A-” • Also favors companies paying a dividend • Lowest they earn is a “B-” • Penalizes young small companies • Good companies > 10 years may not be ranked • No ranking of foreign companies • Used only on US based companies
Final Thoughts S&P Quality Ranking has … • No price component • Therefore no “buy” or “sell” aspect as found in other S&P proprietary measures (STAR & Fair Value/Outlook) • No projected return • As in Sec. 5c of the SSG • Which is our reason for studying stocks • Use as your starting point • First cut • Remember it’s limitations
Final Thoughts Use the S&P Quality Ranking … • Like a pilot use your instruments • Several different gauges to tell the same thing • Use in conjunction with other metrics • VL Financial Strength • Quick Analysis • 60 Second Equity Analysis • It is ok to have overlap • Cross-check your work on the SSG • The visual analysis • Evaluating Management
What We Learned • The Value of a simple quality metric • How To Eliminate Stocks Before Doing a SSG • How To Monitor Existing Stocks • Another use for OPS • Another Benefit of using NAIC Software
Further Reading • Brain Lewis articles • Sept. 04 Better Investing (BI) • Aug. 04 BITS (expanded article) • ICL list (NAIC Chat room – free to anyone) • August 12 to 23, 2004 • www.standardandpoors.com • Equity Research (near top) • Analytical Methodology (left side)