1 / 1

Disparate treatment

Fair Housing Act’s Three Legal Theories : Are they all just different ways of showing discriminatory purpose?. π ’s burden. Δ ’s burden. Theories applicable to both racial and disability-based discrimination. Disparate treatment.

erv
Download Presentation

Disparate treatment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fair Housing Act’s Three Legal Theories: Are they all just different ways of showing discriminatory purpose? π’s burden Δ’s burden Theories applicable to both racial and disability-based discrimination Disparate treatment “We would have excluded the proposed use even without any biased voting.” π’s prima facie case of biased motive Disparate impact π’s prima facie case of statistical disparity from practice “We had a substantial, legit reason for exclusion” Theories applicable to disability-based discrimination alone “The accommodation is not necessary for equal opportunity, because disabled people have no special need for excluded use.” Reasonable accommodation necessary for equal opportunity π’s prima facie case specifying some accommodation that’s not a “fundamental alteration” of zoning.

More Related