1 / 17

Mining Helium-3 on the Lunar surface

A Business Strategy and Analysis. Mining Helium-3 on the Lunar surface. Collin Bezrouk Sam Moffatt Mike Zwach Aaron Olsen James Thomas Elizabeth Kenneick Christine Fanchiang Julia Freeburg. Agenda. Applications and Problems of He 3 Solution and Concept of Operations

erv
Download Presentation

Mining Helium-3 on the Lunar surface

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A Business Strategy and Analysis Mining Helium-3 on the Lunar surface Collin Bezrouk Sam Moffatt MikeZwach Aaron Olsen James Thomas Elizabeth Kenneick ChristineFanchiang Julia Freeburg

  2. Agenda • Applications and Problems of He3 • Solution and Concept of Operations • Barriers of Entry • Pressure from Substitute Products • Bargaining Power of Buyers and Suppliers • Government / Industry Competition

  3. Applications of He3 in Industry • Medical Research • Sub 1K cryo-cooling • Laser research, Lung imaging, etc. • Fusion Energy Research • Highly sought by researchers • Clean energy, no radioactive byproducts. • Geological Surveying • Finding oil well or other mineral deposits • Road construction • Homeland Security • Security scanners in airports • Precision instruments in guided missiles

  4. Problems Obtaining He3 • 0.000137% of Helium on Earth • Current Costs: $7,000/gram • Demand: Increased 10x in 7 years

  5. Solution to He3 shortage Problem:Helium 3 is an expensive and scarce material with a growing demand in multiple industries. Solution: Extract Helium 3 from the lunar regolith and transport it to the Earth.

  6. Concept of Operations: Extraction

  7. Concept of Operations: Transportation

  8. Threat of Entry: Economies of Scale 1. Finding H3: LOW: Academic work underway since 1986 • Mine Layout: LOW: H3 in upper regolith, easy access • Mine Equipment / Processing: VERY STRONG: $$ to develop and transport • Transport to Market: VERY STRONG: Not now available Overall, Very Strong Barrier of Entry to Market favors Large Companies such as Oil & Gas companies with existing process and funding for exploration and prospecting

  9. Threat of Entry: Capital Requirements • Development costs: (High) • Strongestbarrier is by far the rover and excavator costs ($3.5 Billion) • Transportation costs: (Medium/High) • Possibility of being a significant barrier ($80-125 Million/launch) • Operations costs: (Low) • Shouldn’t be a significant barrier based on established communication and helium distribution techniques

  10. Threat of Entry: Government Policy • We would have a monopoly on He3 (High) • Competition encouraged and required. • He3 is not on the open market. (Med) • The DOE might assume control over the distribution, limiting our market to government purchases. • Must adhere to refinement and containment standards. (Low) • Outer Space Treaty states that nobody owns the moon (Med) • Could apply to Lunar resources and utilization

  11. Force 2: Intensity of Rivalry among existing competitors • Small number of firms in market, low initial competition. • Russia currently has largest stockpile of He3, though their supply is limited. • Market unstable due to short supply and limited number of market participants. • He3 on the moon provides nearly unlimited source • He3 a commodity with a falling supply, yet growing demand. • High strategic stakes to be the initial operation on the lunar surface.

  12. Force 3: Pressure from Substitute Products • Overall assessment: Low • Substitutes: • Terrestrial Sources • Natural Decay of Tritium -decades • Recycling • Extraction from natural gas, atmosphere - limited • Technological Sources • Technology advancements • reduction of sensitivity and introduction of toxicity

  13. Force 4: Bargaining Power of Buyers • Overall Assessment: Medium/Low • Buyer groups: (in order of most to least influential) • Scientific Community (particle accelerators, cryogenics, research) • Government (cryogenics – navigation/guidance of missiles, munitions, land vehicles) • Neutron Detection (homeland security) • Non-Government uses (medical uses)

  14. Force 5: Bargaining Power of Suppliers • Supplier labor: highly-skilled workforce, but overall not a major influence to supplier demands • Suppliers are powerful, but also have a strong incentive to provide low-cost reliable product(s). • As market matures the power of suppliers would decrease because more suppliers would be able to enter the market.

  15. Government as an Industry Competition Force • Industry is concentrated • DHS could be 80% of purchases • Gov’t is in a power position because they have access to information about what the industry is doing, how they are doing it, and at what cost

  16. Summary

  17. Questions?

More Related