110 likes | 323 Views
Contextualizing the Zapatista Rebellion. February 3, 2000. The rebellion. January 1, 1994 The government reaction The drive back to the Lacandon jungle Autonomous (non-gov’tal) communities grappling with the meanings. The San Andres Accords (1996).
E N D
Contextualizing the Zapatista Rebellion February 3, 2000
The rebellion • January 1, 1994 • The government reaction • The drive back to the Lacandon jungle • Autonomous (non-gov’tal) communities • grappling with the meanings
The San Andres Accords (1996) • 1.basic respect for the diversity of the indigenous population of Chiapas; • 2.the conservation of the the natural resources within the territories used and occupied by indigenous peoples; • 3.a greater participation of indigenous communities in the decisions and control of public expenditures; • 4.the participation of indigenous communities in determining their own development plans, as well as having control over their own administrative and judicial affairs; • 5.the autonomy of indigenous communities and their right of free determination in the framework of the State;
Some useful concepts • Political process model (exacerbation of grievance; indigenous resources; political opportunity structures) (McAdam) • cognitive praxis (Eyerman and Jamison) • counter-hegemony (historic bloc; war of position) (Gramsci) • frame resonance (Snow and Benford)
Understanding the context • Exacerbation of threat • What was the new threat to the communities of the Lacandon and Las Canadas area starting in the early 1990s? • Indigenous resources • What ideological, social, and leadership resources were enjoyed by the lowland communities? • Political opportunity structure • How were the rebels able to survive, not be wiped out, and become an international presence?
The exacerbated threat, 1 • Model of development in Chiapas starting in 1972 • Migration to jungle • The post 1982 crises • flooding by Guatemalan refugees • Rise in political repression (fewer goodies) • rush to restore fiscal credibility through increased exports • Discovery of oil • Plans to use water resources, set up biodivrsity reserves
Exacerbated threat, 2 • The rewriting of the Constitution in 1992 • The opening up to international capital to invest in dams and oil with NAFTA
Indigenous resources • Recent migration and ethnic mixture: pan-Indian identity • Geography • Protestantism • Liberationist Catholicism • High-quality ideological leadership
Political opportunity structure • Mexican political culture: the Revolution, Constitution, and patronage • Strategy of gov’t: wear down through low-intensity war of attrition • The politics of entry into NAFTA: need for Mexico to distiguish itself from Guatemala • The widespread domestic sympathy for rebels • The rapid mobilization of international attention (the “netwar”)