140 likes | 275 Views
Industry Organizations Comparison Chart (IP ’08, December 3, 2008 - Grenoble, France). Ian R. Mackintosh Chairman & President, OCP-IP. So, what is it?. Overview of multiple trade organizations Describes roles and characteristics of these different groups A quick reference chart
E N D
Industry Organizations Comparison Chart(IP ’08, December 3, 2008 - Grenoble, France) Ian R. Mackintosh Chairman & President, OCP-IP
So, what is it? • Overview of multiple trade organizations • Describes roles and characteristics of these different groups • A quick reference chart • Basically, a spreadsheet
Why developed? • Ongoing enquiries and misunderstandings • Members & Industry, alike • Invisibility of landscape • No cohesive reference aid • Opportunity to accelerate awareness • Economic times are bleak. So… • Help understanding of activities, value & benefits • Provide guidance and support for those justifying budgets
Uses • Provide rapid orientations to individual “.orgs” • Facilitate understanding across the industry • Highlight the DIFFERENT value propositions & goals • Highlight the many similarities and numerous differences
Who needs it? • Engineering • Seeking TTM and cost-reduction advantages in collaboration/resource sharing • Marketing • Seeking data and knowledge for business development, strategic alignment & partnerships • Management • Deciding “Make vs. Buy” opportunities and justifying expenditures
What does it contain? • It’s a spreadsheet • Showing high-level characteristics of participant organizations…
Some Interesting Observations • Different focuses, missions, working structures and operations • Purpose built/one form does NOT fit all! • Different infrastructures required to support each standard or business purpose • Money IS important • Primarily membership dues • Was once heavily denied • Benefits, standards and services are PRODUCTS and must be marketed as such • .Orgs list many collaborations • Despite the rumors!
Availability • Press release date: September 30, 2008 • FREE public access • www.ocpip.org • FREE participation • Contact admin@ocpip.org
Summary • Interest very high • 1500 hits in two months • Podcast in 4 locations • Most Engineering Companies need to leverage several or many such memberships • Should “Buy vs. Make” all NON-CORE products, standards and data • Cost savings and TTM advantages • Economies of scale • All mature industries become “standards-centric” • Sharing data, information and actual standards • Unwise to be left behind!
S P P OCP-IP Industry Vision NATIVE WHOLE INFRASTRUCTURE VALUE ADDED Proprietary/Closed Proprietary/Closed Proprietary/Closed Best-of-Breed/Open P Corporate Growth (Product-centric) Industry Growth (Standard-centric) Source: Mackintosh Model
A Parochial Note: OCP-IP Update • OCP Checker • In CoreCreator II, PR date 11/19 • TLM Kits • World class and OSCI 2.0 • Testing EOY as planned, ship 1Q09 • OCP 3.0 • Technically complete/drafting • Huge body of work • Working Group (WG) participants have full access • Cache coherence, power management, 3rd consensus high-speed profile, etc.
Industry Organizations Comparison Chart(IP ’08, December 3, 2008 - Grenoble, France) Ian R. Mackintosh Chairman & President, OCP-IP