1 / 21

Brittle Creep: How it works and its role in fracture

Brittle Creep: How it works and its role in fracture. 02/05/2014 Stephen Perry. System of stress in a conventional ‘ triaxial ’ test. The axial stress generally exceeds the confining pressure, the axial pressure =  and the confining pressure = 2 =  3;.

esben
Download Presentation

Brittle Creep: How it works and its role in fracture

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Brittle Creep: How it works and its role in fracture 02/05/2014 Stephen Perry

  2. System of stress in a conventional ‘triaxial’ test The axial stress generally exceeds the confining pressure, the axial pressure = and the confining pressure = 2= 3; Sample before and after triaxial test Confining pressure : sc= s3 = s2. Differential stress : sD= s1 - s3

  3. From Scholz, 2002 Stage I Stage III Stage IV Normal Failure due to Coalescense of Cracks • Most tests relate to a stress failure criterion where the sample is loaded with increasing stress • Failure occurs when become large enough to move past the failure criterion

  4. Static Load Experimental Setup (Brantut, in press) - Static load experiments show that samples can fail below their short term failure strength – this is called static fatigue

  5. Measurements in Real Rocks (Lockner) • 16 constant strain rate experiments conducted on room-dry samples of Westerly granite • Axial shortening rates of 1 um/s and 0.01 um/s were used (0.01 um/s shown on right) • Failure criterion do slightly depend on loading rate -> shows some time dependence in the system (Lockner, 1998)

  6. Creep Experiment Simulation • - 3 characteristic creep phases are shown: • 1. primary/transient creep (strain rate α 1/t) • 2. constant strain rate • 3. accelerating creep culminating in failure • - The sample fails by Static Fatigueafter sub-critical crack growth • - Rock strength is time dependent (Lockner, 1998)

  7. Mechanism for Brittle Creep? • Propagation of sub-critical cracks in a statically loaded sample (below critical stress intensity factor) • Cracks propagate through stress corrosion – chemical bonds are broken over time at the crack tips (Brantut, 2012)

  8. 3 Phases of Brittle Creep • Primary – formation of microcracks • Secondary – cracks don’t interact; strain levels off • Tertiary – interaction between cracks causes increase in strain and failure

  9. Formulation of peak strength vs. strain rate • Stress logarithmically depends on strain rate • Create a curve based on loading phase, beginning of failure, and an inferred complete failure curve (dotted line) Inelastic strain Rate Characteristic Peak Strain Rate Peak Strength Differential Stress (Lockner, 1998)

  10. Brantut Brittle Deformation Experiments • Constant strain rate and constant stress triaxialdeformation tests on 3 types of sandstone (Brantut, in press)

  11. Axial Strain becomes the important factor • Measured evolution of P wave speeds is similar for 2 different types of tests even with differences in strain rate of several orders of magnitude • Thus wave speed is dependent on axial inelastic strain and not necessarily the process • Link between microstructural state and inelastic axial strain (Brantut, in press)

  12. Brantut Axial Strain Rate Relation Differential Stress Instantaneous Brittle Creep Rate Characteristic “activation” stress Reference strain rate (applied during constant strain rate test) (Brantut, in press)

  13. Brantut’s Formulations vs. R+S Friction • Rate and State (General): • Axial Strain Rate Relation:

  14. Lockner’s Formulation vs. R+S friction • Rate and State: • Peak Strength vs. Strain Rate (1) (2) • Both have the same form except there is no evolution term in the intact rock relation • Possible to recover (1) by integrating (2) over a population of contacts?

  15. A Tale of Two State Variables • Lockner – absense of an explicit state variable • This is ok because state variable relates to asperity contact area evolution which doesn’t have an analog in bulk material • Brantut – state variable relates to inelastic axial strain • Inelastic axial strain corresponds to the density of cracks which is related to the stiffness of the material

  16. Relation to Other Mechanisms – Pressure Solution Creep - Brittle Creep is primarily a high stress / low temperature effect

  17. Additional Factors and Conclusions • Moisture content in samples can affect propagation rate of microcracks – it is somewhat a chemical process • R+S friction could be brittle creep on the asperity level - both experiments see a rate dependency • State variable is less clear, but may be a consequence of R+S being on a planar surface

  18. How to cracks normally propagate? • Crack has very high stress near the tip (near infinite) • The bigger the crack gets the faster it propagates (it accelerates up to Rayleigh wave speed) • Talk about Stress Intensity factor? • Put in diagram from Nadia’s class

  19. Consequences of Brittle Creep • Collapse in mining structures years after they are built • Potential cause of roof collapse in the “Big Dig” in Boston in 2006

  20. Static Fatigue Simulations using data from experiments • 3 characteristic creep phases are shown: • 1. primary/transient creep (ε. α 1/t) • 2. constant strain rate • 3. accelerating creep culminating in failure • Can be used to compute failure time for granite loaded to some fraction of its short term failure strength

More Related