1 / 30

Uses of Chern-Simons Actions

Uses of Chern-Simons Actions. Ten Years of the AdS/CFT Conjecture Buenos Aires, December 2007. J. Zanelli CECS – Valdivia (Chile). A typical Chern-Simons action is something like this:. or this…. A typical Yang-Mills action is something like this:.

espen
Download Presentation

Uses of Chern-Simons Actions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Uses of Chern-Simons Actions Ten Years of the AdS/CFT Conjecture Buenos Aires, December 2007 J. Zanelli CECS – Valdivia (Chile)

  2. A typical Chern-Simons action is something like this: or this… A typical Yang-Mills action is something like this:

  3. Chern-Simons lagrangians define gauge field theories in a class different from Yang-Mills: • They are explicit functions of the connection (A), • not local functions of the curvature (F) only. • Yet, they yield gauge-invariant field equations. • Related to homotopic/topological invariants on fiber • bundles: characteristic classes. • They require no metric; just a Lie algebra (not • necessarily semisimple); no adjustable parameters, • conformally invariant. More fundamental(?)

  4. They are very sensitive to the dimension. • They naturally couple to branes. • The classical field equations are consistency • conditions for those couplings. • Their quantization corresponds to sum over • holonomies in an embedding space. • CS theories are not exotic but a rather common • occurrence in nature: Anomalies, quantum Hall effect, • 11D supergravity (CJS), superconductivity, 2+1 • gravity, 2n+1 gravity, all of classical mechanics,...

  5. 1. CS action in 0+1 dimensions

  6. Aμ(x) ∙ e z Γ E-Mcoupling Gauge invariance Aμ(x)→Aμ(x)+∂μ Ω(x) , is ensured by current conservation, ∂μjμ =0, provided Ω(z(+∞))=Ω(z(-∞)). Not quite gauge invariant, but quasi-invariant.

  7. Gauge transformationsAA+dΩ(x) • Gen. coordinate transf. zμz’μ(z) This coupling is consistent with the minimal derivative substitution Good for quantization: • This expression is invariant under • Lorentz transformations, (Λμν)

  8. Take for an abelian connection and set n=0: 0+1 CS theory ? ? ? not exactly… The simplest Chern-Simons action Is this a sensible action?

  9. Varying the action, This only means δA=dΩwith Ω(-∞)=Ω(∞), or ∂Γ=0. The classical configurations are arbitrary U(1) connections with PBC or living in a periodic 1d spacetime Alternatively, I can also be viewed as an action for the embedding coordinates zμ,

  10. ∙ ∙ Varying the action, The classical orbits are those with zero Lorentz force: the electric and magnetic forces cancel each other out. N.B.: In order to obtain the equation of motion, z must satisfy periodic boundary conditions.

  11. A bit about the quantum theory Thus, the integral is dominated by those orbits for which the holonomies are quantized, Flux quantization Does this describe a physically sensible system? What are the degrees of freedom?

  12. ∙ z0=t Let z0=t,zμ=(t, zi),i=1,2,∙∙∙,2s. ∙ e zμ zi ∙ This action describes a mechanical system where eA0(z)= -H and eAi(z)=pi Varying w.r.t. zi(t) yields Hamilton’sequations: where F=dA andEi= ∂iA(z).

  13. Classical mechanics Chern-Simons Vanishing Lorentz force Hamilton’s equations Invariance under canonical transf. Gauge invariance Gen. coordinate transformations Invariance under time reparam. Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization Flux/holonomy quantization • Any mechanical system with s degrees of freedom can be described by a 0+1 C-S action in a (2s+1)-dimensional target space.

  14. z(xi) More dimensions… A C-S action in 2+1 dimensions can be viewed as a coupling between a brane and an external gauge field • Invariant under: • Gen. coord. transf. on the worldvolumezμz’μ(z) • Lorentz transformations on the target space (Λμν) • Gauge transformationsAA+dΩ [quasi-invariant]

  15. z(xi) For D=3, 5, 7,…New possibilities arise: • Nonabelian algebras • A(z) can be dynamical (propagating in the worldvolume) • Worldvolume dynamics (gravity) • Degeneracy (for D≥5) • Quantization? (open problem)

  16. 2. CS action in 2n+1 dimensions

  17. The coefficients c1, …cn are fixed rational numbers, where Invariant under gauge transformations(up to boundary terms) under Non abelian CS action in 2n+1 dimensions

  18. C-S dynamics LδL=0 Comment 0+1 eA -- No dynamics for A 2+1 A=pure gauge nondegenerate 2n+1 Nontrivial, propagating, degenerate

  19. The problem arises from the fact that for D=2n+1 with n≥2, the field equations are nonlinear in the curvature, where Gk are the generators of the Lie algebra. The linearized perturbations around a given classical configuration F0, obey Degeneracy of CS theories (D=2n+1≥5) The dynamics depends on the form ofF0 .

  20. Consequences of the degeneracy • Unpredictability of evolution • Freezing out of degrees of freedom • Loss of information about the initial data • Irreversibility of evolution

  21. D/sourceQuantizationComment Dirac charge quant. cond. point particle Flux/Holonomy (0-brane)Bohr-Sommerfeld quant. Finite, power- membrane counting renormalizable Anybody’s guess 2n-brane How?

  22. For example, Pontryagin 4-form In general, • Homogeneous gauge-invariant polynomial • Characteristic class (Chern-Weil, Euler, Pontryagin, …) • Its integral defines a homotopic invariant of the manifold All the interesting features of CS forms originate from their relation with characteristic classes.

  23. 3. CS Gravity actions in 2n+1 dimensions

  24. 1. Equivalence Principle: • Spacetime is locally approximated by Minkowski • space and has the same (local) Lorentz symmetry. • GR is the oldest known nonabelian gauge theory for • the group SO(3,1). 2. Gravitation should be a theory whose output is the spacetime geometry. Therefore, it is best to start with a theory that makes no assumptions about the local geometry. 1&2  Chern-Simons theory is probably a better choice

  25. Action (first order formalism ): Vielbein (metricity) Connection (parallelism) =Curvature 2-form =Torsion 2-form There are two characteristic classes associated to the rotation groups SO(s,t): the Euler and the Pontryagin classes. Associated with each of them there are the corresponding CS actions

  26. Steps for constructing CS gravities: 1. Combine the vielbein and spin connection into a connection for the dS, AdS, or Poincaré group: 2. Select the bracket that corresponds to the invariant characteristic class to be used (Euler or Pontryagin), e.g., 3. Write down the lagrangian

  27. No dimensionful constants (scale invariants) • No arbitrary adjustable/renormalizableconstants • Possess black hole solutions • Admit and limit • Admit SUSY extensions for and any odd D, • and yield field theories with spins ≤ 2 only • Give rise to acceptable D=4effective theories Some form of dimensional reduction is needed CS gravities (D=2n-1) (summary) However, they only exist in odd dimensions… A.Anabalón, S.Willison, J.Z: hep-th/0610136;hep-th/0702192

  28. 4. Summary

  29. CS actions have been used in physics much longer than • one usually thinks. • CS theories can be viewed as boundary theories coming • from topological field theories in even D=2n manifolds. • Theyhaveno free adjustable parameters and require no • metric structure. • Degeneracy for D≥5: limited predictability, irreversibleloss • of degrees of freedom, dynamical dimensional reduction. • There exist CS (super-) gravities with dimensionless • couplings, all fields have spins ≤ 2and the metric is not a • fundamental field but a condensate… • They are so exceptional, it’s at least worth studying them!

  30. Thanks!

More Related