1 / 37

Discipline and Disproportionality in the New IDEIA

Prologue: How Do You Spell IDEA?. ``PART A--GENERAL PROVISIONS``SEC. 601. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1400.>> SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS; FINDINGS; PURPOSES. ``(a) Short Title.--This title may be cited as the `Individuals with Disabilities Education Act'.. New Reporting Requirements Under

esperanza
Download Presentation

Discipline and Disproportionality in the New IDEIA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Discipline and Disproportionality in the New IDEIA Russ Skiba Center for Evaluation and Education Policy Indiana University Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children Salt Lake City, Utah April 6, 2006

    2. Prologue: How Do You Spell IDEA? ``PART A--GENERAL PROVISIONS``SEC. 601. <<NOTE: 20 USC 1400.>> SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS; FINDINGS; PURPOSES. ``(a) Short Title.--This title may be cited as the `Individuals with Disabilities Education Act'.

    3. New Reporting Requirements Under IDEA 2004 Under Section 618, States must provide data on: Incidence and duration of disciplinary actions by race, ethnicity, limited English proficiency status, gender, and disability category, of children with disabilities, including suspensions of 1 day or more Number & percentage removed to IAES compared to children w/o disabilities removed to alt. ed.

    4. New Reporting Requirements Specific to Disproportionality Each state shall provide for “collection and examination of data to determine if significant disproportionality based on race and ethnicity is occurring in the State and LEA’s with respect to: A) Identification and B) Placement C) Incidence, duration and type of disciplinary actions, including suspensions and expulsions 15% rule: Requires LEA’s identified as significantly overidentified to reserve maximum funds (15%) for early intervention Does this apply to discipline?

    5. Minority Disproportionality in School Discipline

    6. Non-Discriminatory Application: 30 Years of Study CDF (1975): Black students suspended 2-3x as frequently Studies since find disproportionality in: Office referrals Suspension & Expulsion Corporal Punishment Evidence of disproportionality by economic status, gender, and disability designation

    7. The Interaction of Race and Gender Middle School Out-of-School Suspension (Raffaele Mendez, 2003) Black Males: 50% suspended Black Females: 33% White Males: 25% White Females: 9.3% Black males 16x as likely as white females to be suspended (Gregory, 1996)

    8. Raffaele Mendez (2003) Race, Gender, and Special Education Black + Male + Special Ed + Poor = 67% suspension rate These students are 5% of population, but: 24% of 3-5 suspensions 34% of 6-8 suspensions 48% of 9-11 suspensions 56% of 12-14 suspensions 100% of 14+ suspensions

    9. Skiba (2000) Disproportionality Starts in the Classroom

    10. Rausch & Skiba, 2004 Disproportionality is Greatest at Suburban Schools

    11. Rausch & Skiba, 2004 Disproportionality Begins Early and Persists

    12. Used Heavily and Disproportionately on African American Males

    13. Overall Incident Rate Comparison: African American and White Males

    14. Alternative Explanations of Disciplinary Disproportionality Disproportionality is related to SES SES and disproportionality correlate, but… Effects of race remain after control Do black students misbehave more? No supporting evidence May in fact be treated more severely for same offenses We can’t say that racial disparity is discrimination however—it is possible there may be alternative explanations. First is SES/Race Hypothesis—when control statistically for poverty thru free lunch status, however, racial disparities remain significant. Second, could hypothesize that AA students earn more suspensions because they act out more. But no data. If anything, existing research has suggested that AA students are treated more severely for same offenses.We can’t say that racial disparity is discrimination however—it is possible there may be alternative explanations. First is SES/Race Hypothesis—when control statistically for poverty thru free lunch status, however, racial disparities remain significant. Second, could hypothesize that AA students earn more suspensions because they act out more. But no data. If anything, existing research has suggested that AA students are treated more severely for same offenses.

    15. What Behaviors are Students Referred For? By Race White students referred more for: Smoking Vandalism Leaving w/o permission Obscene Language Black students referred more for: Disrespect Excessive Noise Threat Loitering We looked at reasons for referral—assuming that if this was warranted by behavior, the reasons for referral for AA studnets would be more serious. But found something interesting—while white students were referred more for XXXX, black students were referred more for. Hard to say which is more serious, but clearly white referrals more objective, and black more subjective reasons (even threat is more subjective)We looked at reasons for referral—assuming that if this was warranted by behavior, the reasons for referral for AA studnets would be more serious. But found something interesting—while white students were referred more for XXXX, black students were referred more for. Hard to say which is more serious, but clearly white referrals more objective, and black more subjective reasons (even threat is more subjective)

    16. Improved Student Behavior? 30-50% of students suspended are repeat offenders “Suspension functions as a reinforcer...rather than as a punisher” (Tobin, Sugai & Colvin,1996) Use of suspension correlates with School dropout (school level) (Raffaele-Mendez; Ekstrom, 1986) Juvenile incarceration (state level) (Skiba et al) Dropout or pushout? (Bowditch, 1994) Finally, effectiveness. In studies that report it, there is typically a 30%-50% recidivism rate in suspension. Clearly doesn’t meet the behavioral criteria for an effective intervention to reduce behavior and some researchers have said that... Moderate correlation with school dropout rate in school level data and with state rates of incarceration at state level. Qualitative studies have found that principals admit to using suspension over and over to “convince” troublemakers that they should voluntarily drop out.Finally, effectiveness. In studies that report it, there is typically a 30%-50% recidivism rate in suspension. Clearly doesn’t meet the behavioral criteria for an effective intervention to reduce behavior and some researchers have said that... Moderate correlation with school dropout rate in school level data and with state rates of incarceration at state level. Qualitative studies have found that principals admit to using suspension over and over to “convince” troublemakers that they should voluntarily drop out.

    17. Percent Passing ISTEP by School Disciplinary Use (Adjusted for Demographic and Economic Indicators)

    18. Disproportionality of Students with Disabilities in School Discipline

    19. Students with Disabilities are Suspended Disproportionately Leone et al (2000) Kentucky: 14% of enrolled, 20% of susps. Maryland: 13.1% of enrolled, 24% of susps. Similar in Minn., Del. Kansas (2.7 x as likely) But 21st Annual Report to Congress (2000) finds no evidence of disciplinary disproportionality, based on 1994 OCR Report

    20. Students with ED are Really Over-Represented % of Students Reporting Susp/Exp (Wagner et al., 2005) Elem/Mid: 47.7% of ED HS: 72.9% ED El/Mid: 11.7% of other HS: 27.6% Other Kansas: ED 7.5X to be suspended as likely as others with disability; 12x as likely as all students (Cooley, 1995)

    21. Are There Disparities in Behavior? More severe: GAO (2001): Serious misbehavior for SpEd at 50 incidents/1000 students vs. 15/1000 for gen.ed. Fiore & Reynolds (1996): Discrepancies in Weapons, Other Dangerous Behaviors, Violence Against Staff Less severe: McFadden et al. (1992): Students with disabs less likely to be truant; more likely for bothering others, defiance Cooley (1995): No differences in reasons for referral Leone et al. (2000): Do students with disabilities just get caught more often?

    22. Disparities in Treatment McFadden et al. (1992): Students w/ disabs. more likely to receive harsh, less likely to receive mild punishment GAO (2001) survey: Principals report equal treatment for special/general ed. Do students with disabilities account for disproportionate disciplinary effort? GAO: 31% agree Skiba et al.: 33% agree

    27. Do We Have the Capability to Collect This Data? Fiore & Reynolds (1996): Only 6 states and 16 districts provided breakdown of discipline of students with disabilities by race Indiana Data General education: By incident Special education: By individual

    28. What Do We Do with Disproportionality? (2) Review and revision of policies, practices, and procedures.--In the case of a determination of significant disproportionality with respect to the identification of children as children with disabilities, or the placement in particular educational settings of such children, in accordance with paragraph (1), the State or the Secretary of the Interior, as the case may be, shall-- ``(A) provide for the review and, if appropriate, revision of the policies, procedures, and practices used in such identification or placement to ensure that such policies,[[Page 118 STAT. 2740]] procedures, and practices comply with the requirements of this title;

    29. Local Equity Action Development (LEAD) Projects

    30. Studying Equity at Home: The LEAD Process What is the Nature of the Problem? What does the data tell us? Courageous Conversations Identify Actions of Greatest Potential Impact Develop a Plan Implement, Assess, Adapt I’d like to challenge you to think, not in terms of quick fixes, but in terms of a process for examining and addressing disproportionality. I’d like to challenge you to think, not in terms of quick fixes, but in terms of a process for examining and addressing disproportionality.

    31. LEAD Projects Implementation Ten districts currently participating in Equity Action Projects Pre-Referral Process Peer Coaching K-2 Instructional Project Family Involvement

    32. Deficit Thinking: Disproportionality due primarily to characteristics of minority populations (e.g. Herrnstein & Murray) Critical Race Theory: Disproportionality as a decision to maintain the structure of white privilege (e.g. Bell, Delgado) Cultural Reproduction: Racial/economic inequity maintained by roles and actions of individuals within institutions, perhaps unconciously (e.g., Bowles & Gintis, Oakes) ...Maybe We Shouldn’t Talk About It...

    33. The Difficulty of Talking About Race

    34. Race and the Relief Effort "The storm didn't discriminate, and neither did the recovery effort.” --George W. Bush "There is a historical indifference to the pain of poor people, and black people ... we seem to adjust more easily to black pain.” --Rev. Jesse Jackson SMUDGE IS DESIGNSMUDGE IS DESIGN

    35. Perspectives on Katrina: Washington Post/ABC News Poll, 9/13/05

    36. What’s Your Theory? Poverty? Systemic inadequacies? Community contributions? Cultural incompetence? Negative peer culture? Historical discrimination? There’s an interesting concept I’ve come across lately and that is Personal Theories. The way we operate as a teacher, an administrator, a policymaker, depends on our personal theories about what is going on with schooling. Take this opportunity this evening, tomorrow, and Saturday to examine your own personal theory of disproportionality. Do you believe its due to XXX? Any of those are ok theories, and disp is likely due to some mix--challenge you to consider theories other than your most favorite. What is the mix you believe is responsible?There’s an interesting concept I’ve come across lately and that is Personal Theories. The way we operate as a teacher, an administrator, a policymaker, depends on our personal theories about what is going on with schooling. Take this opportunity this evening, tomorrow, and Saturday to examine your own personal theory of disproportionality. Do you believe its due to XXX? Any of those are ok theories, and disp is likely due to some mix--challenge you to consider theories other than your most favorite. What is the mix you believe is responsible?

    37. What We Need: Need formats that enable collection of the needed data WESTAT/OSEP calculation package Need more research on intersection of race, disability, and discipline Need models of change Leadership on the topic of race

    38. Russ Skiba Center for Evaluation and Education Policy 509 E. Third St. Bloomington, IN 47401 812-855-1240 fax: 812-856-8440 skiba@indiana.edu

More Related