1 / 37

Report of a Workshop Jan 15-17 2006 Bibliotheca Alexandrina

Building a Digital Library of the Middle East. Report of a Workshop Jan 15-17 2006 Bibliotheca Alexandrina. Presenters: Steve Griffin, National Science Foundation Joan Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information Joyce Ray, Institute of Museum and Library Services

etammy
Download Presentation

Report of a Workshop Jan 15-17 2006 Bibliotheca Alexandrina

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Building a Digital Library of the Middle East Report of a Workshop Jan 15-17 2006 Bibliotheca Alexandrina

  2. Presenters: • Steve Griffin, National Science Foundation • Joan Lippincott, Coalition for Networked Information • Joyce Ray, Institute of Museum and Library Services • Don Waters, Mellon Foundation

  3. Workshop Sponsors

  4. Background 2003 - Interagency meetings on rebuilding the cultural history of Iraq convened by White House & State Dept.

  5. Defining the Scope Ancient Near East: Mesopotamia (Iraq and Syria); Persia (Iran); Egypt; the Levant (Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Palestinian Authority); and Anatolia (Turkey)

  6. U.S.-Egypt Joint Science & Technology Fund Grant to The Institute of Museum & Library Services and Bibliotheca Alexandrina June 2005

  7. Coordinating Committee Noha Adly - Director of Information and Communication Technology Department and ISIS (International School of Information Science), Bibliotheca Alexandrina Stephen Griffin - Program Director, Computer and Information Science and Engineering, National Science Foundation Kenneth Hamma - Executive Director, Digital Policy and Initiatives, J. Paul Getty Trust Ronald Larsen - Dean, School of Information Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Joan Lippincott - Associate Executive Director, Coalition for Networked Information Magdy Nagi - Head of the Information and Communication Technology Sector, Bibliotheca Alexandrina Joyce Ray - Associate Deputy Director for Library Services, Institute of Museum and Library Services

  8. Workshop ObjectivesAugust 2005 Planning Meeting • Agree on a long-term vision • Assess the current information infrastructure in the Middle East and examine the potential for establishing advanced research networks • Identify a model for content aggregation, management, and preservation • Identify content scope and services • Document requirements as a roadmap for future actions

  9. Desirable Characteristics of the Digital LibraryAugust 2005 Planning Meeting • A framework that can accommodate resources from many sources and subject areas • Content that has public value, is easily navigable, and is unrestricted for use • Connected to a large network supporting wide-scale access and exchange • Maintained in a trusted repository with appropriate redundancy to ensure long-term preservation and continuity of access

  10. Workshop Attendees Arrive in Alexandria January 15, 2006

  11. Working Groups • Vision and Mission • Network Infrastructure • Content, Collections and Users • Interoperability and Standards

  12. Vision and Mission Working Group Steve Griffin, NSF Ron Larsen, University of Pittsburgh

  13. High-level Vision: - A global knowledge infrastructure that supports the free flow of information; captures many forms of human expression; maximizes use of resources; and serves the research, education and information needs of all people

  14. Vision for MEDL: - To promote the preservation and understanding of the cultural heritage of the Middle East through the collection, curation and dissemination of a sustainable digital record

  15. Scope: - Worldwide resources from and about the cultures and societies of the Middle Eastern and Arab worlds

  16. Features: • Multilingual & Multimedia • Distributed, Open & Interoperable • Integrated into the global knowledge infrastructure • Collaborative • Adaptable for Different Audiences • Sustained

  17. Anticipated Results: - New relationships among cultural heritage organizations • New scholarly collaborations • New resources for education and study • A fuller, shared understanding of the historic human experience and its bearing on the present

  18. Network Infrastructure Working Group Heather Boyles, Internet2

  19. Egyptian R&E Community • 124 Research Centers and Institutes covering 32 Ministries • 16 Governmental Universities • Private Universities and Research Centers • Bibliotheca Alexandrina

  20. Digital Library Support • Memorandum of Understanding with Internet2 • Increase bandwidth and bandwidth reservation to move materials such as images, audio and video into general use • Support digital library research such as indexing, new services and capabilities

  21. Egypt NRENS http://www.frcu.eun.eg/docs-n/index-ee.php http://www.sti.sci.eg/index2.htm

  22. Content, Collections and Users Working Group Ken Hamma, Getty Trust Joan Lippincott, CNI

  23. “Content View” • Focus on inexpensively acquired content • Build the mass of the library • Attract users who would find this content useful • “User View” • Identify likely user communities • Build content to meet their needs

  24. Conclusion: focus on users • Produce scenarios of use • Develop measures based on targeted outcomes in education, training, and technology literacy

  25. Content • Determine scope • Cultural heritage or broader, e.g. scientific • Primarily educational? • Give attention to born-digital materials, not just digitized collections • Consider priority for aggregation projects, those that bring together related, dispersed resources

  26. Content • Balance of library-style and museum-style (curated, exhibit type) collections • Balance needs of scholars and general public • Develop a preservation strategy

  27. Services • Develop nuanced identification of user groups • Assess technology readiness of user groups • Encourage the community to create content and not just access it • Develop a structure that encompasses development of community as well as delivery of content and services

  28. Services • Develop a research/evaluation agenda • Needs assessment • Usability studies • Use analysis • Outcomes appraisal

  29. Next steps: • Inventory content already available in digital form • Clarify interests of institutional partners • Conduct preliminary needs assessment • Identify issues - connectivity, access, infrastructure - of importance near-term • Small pilot projects

  30. Next steps: - Workshop • Potential partners from many countries • Refine a plan for the digital library • Secure commitments from participants to contribute content and/or services

  31. Interoperability and Standards Working Group Sam Quigley, Harvard Don Waters, Mellon Foundation

  32. Assumptions • MEDL will involve a federation of participating institutions, but these have yet to be identified and readiness and need to implement particular standards will likely vary • Content focus of MEDL also has not been identified, but will likely involve various formats • Experience suggests the value of standard-compliant procedures, but it is not fruitful at this stage to articulate a full suite of applicable standards at all levels

  33. A pragmatic approach • Organizers should require the appropriate application of standards for file formats, metadata schemes, vocabulary, language representation, and end-user interfaces as needed • Standards for interoperability at the repository level should receive the most specific attention and should initially focus on OAI-PMH • However, for full functionality OAI-PMH is likely to be insufficient and will need to be supplemented with additional protocols and related infrastructure

  34. An organizational framework • Ideally, the standards and protocol would provide the main basis for broad participation in MEDL • However, to jump start development and to promulgate standards-based activity, a partnership of a small-number of lead organizations would be useful • A lead US institution, in partnership with a lead Middle East institution such as the Bibliotheca Alexandrina, could establish initial agreements, standards and protocols

  35. Key repository operations • OAI-PMH would help support: • Deposit and ingest of materials • Transmission of materials to mirror sites • Digital preservation • Return of value-added information to original data providers (translation, OCR of page images, and other enrichment) as an incentive to keep contributing • Additional protocols and infrastructure would eventually be needed especially to handle more complex digital objects

  36. Nature of a partnership • Agreements should provide for: • Mutual organizational and technical support • Content development • Mirror sites and a dissemination plan • A structure for participation by other institutions • The development of standards-based services, including digitization, OCR, cataloging, translating, depositing, and preservation

  37. What Next? http://www.sis.pitt.edu/~egyptdlw/index.html

More Related